![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 27/06/2012 18:05, Alan White wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:34:43 +0100, wrote: I read this NG a lot and the grammar and spelling and badly written sentences are rife. However most are tolerated and not commented on. It used to be considered very poor netiquette to criticise the grammar and spelling of other posters for obvious reasons. I find it really annoying. I have not had the advantage of a good English education. Partly the school I went to and partly I just have difficulty with spelling. I have, however, hadexperiencein Electronics and ran my own business successfully for many years. Mycollegeresults are good with my City and Guilds,distinctionon all parts. I have never had a 'paid for' driving lesson, but passed my test the first time forboth carand motorcycle. I also had courses in BSL and passed with credit. Computer code (a long time ago). Ham radio (Distinction) when the exam was a real exam. When I amon hereand I seethe awful typing and spellingand grammar that even I recognise as being wrong. I amappalled. ButIdon't say anything. I am not dyslexic, but I do have a form of word blindness. I cannot spell a lot of words and I cannot see what the problem is. I have to rely on the spell checker. I can return tosomethingI have written later and see the errors. I can see the spelling is wrong, butstillcannot spell it correctly without thehelp of the spell checker . That is how the incorrect plural came through on my original reply. I trusted the spell checker inthunderbird. The reply I got was uncalled for andunhelpful. And, as I said because this is a technical NG the word Technical wastotally wrong in my opinion. However, I did place a smile after it. The reply did not add anything to the subject being discussed. It waspurelya pop at my reply. I did not take it badly at first, but now I am slightly ****ed that all the grammar policesuddenlycome out and have a go. Thanks for the support where given. Gary |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
I find it really annoying. I have not had the advantage of a good
English education. Partly the school I went to and partly I just have difficulty with spelling. I have, however, had experience in Electronics and ran my own business successfully for many years. My college results are good with my City and Guilds,distinction on all parts. I have never had a 'paid for' driving lesson, but passed my test the first time for both car and motorcycle. I also had courses in BSL and passed with credit. Computer code (a long time ago). Ham radio (Distinction) when the exam was a real exam. When I am on here and I see the awful typing and spelling and grammar that even I recognise as being wrong. I am appalled. But I don't say anything. I am not dyslexic, but I do have a form of word blindness. I cannot spell a lot of words and I cannot see what the problem is. I have to rely on the spell checker. I can return to something I have written later and see the errors. I can see the spelling is wrong, but still cannot spell it correctly without the help of the spell checker . That is how the incorrect plural came through on my original reply. I trusted the spell checker in Thunderbird. The reply I got was uncalled for and unhelpful. And, as I said because this is a technical NG the word Technical was totally wrong in my opinion. However, I did place a smile after it. The reply did not add anything to the subject being discussed. It was purely a pop at my reply. I did not take it badly at first, but now I am slightly ****ed that all the grammar police suddenly come out and have a go. Thanks for the support where given. Gary The previous posting of the above text was reformatted by Thunderbird. When it for some reason asked if I wanted it in Plain text or HTML. I said plain text , It has never asked before, it said OK and proceeded to screw up the formatting and post it without telling me what it had done. I apologise for the mess. That is technology for you. Fingers crossed this time. |
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roderick Stewart" wrote in
message .myzen.co.uk... In article , Max Demian wrote: If standby on XP doesn't write stuff to the disk, why does it take such a long time to enter (and leave) standby when there are lots of programs active? About a minute or so on my (admittedly underpowered by modern standards) XP desktop. Are you sure it's really going into standby? If during the power up sequence from what you think is standby, you see a black screen with a progress bar and "Resuming Windows", then it's actually been hibernating. "Resuming" in Windows language means recovering from hibernation, which will mean reading lots of stuff from the disk. No, it talks about going into and out of standby. And you have to explicitly enable hibernate in XP. -- Max Demian |
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
... Alan White wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:34:43 +0100, Gary wrote: I read this NG a lot and the grammar and spelling and badly written sentences are rife. However most are tolerated and not commented on. It used to be considered very poor netiquette to criticise the grammar and spelling of other posters for obvious reasons. The motive is important. Is to to help the one who makes mistakes achieve a better standard, or is it to make the one who points them out feel superior? The former also demonstrates superiority, in assuming that the other person wants to achieve a better standard of grammar. -- Max Demian |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
Max Demian wrote:
The motive is important. Is to to help the one who makes mistakes achieve a better standard, or is it to make the one who points them out feel superior? The former also demonstrates superiority, in assuming that the other person wants to achieve a better standard of grammar. That doesn't follow. A sports coach might train his subject to do things he himself is unable to do. Bill |
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gary wrote:
On 27/06/2012 13:41, Peter wrote: On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:54:25 +0100, Mark wrote: On 26/06/2012 10:14, Ian wrote: snip She is old enough to have heard all the TV on fire story's. I remember they seemed like every week when I was a kid and there were public information films on TV advocating unplugging the TV. When you had 20 odd Valves in a TV burning away, fires was common place There are not many PVR on fire story's. That's cos there aren't any Valve PVRs Steve Terry -- Get a free GiffGaff PAYG Sim and £5 bonus after activation at: http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/gfourwwk |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Steve Terry wrote: Gary wrote: On 27/06/2012 13:41, Peter wrote: On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:54:25 +0100, Mark wrote: On 26/06/2012 10:14, Ian wrote: snip She is old enough to have heard all the TV on fire story's. I remember they seemed like every week when I was a kid and there were public information films on TV advocating unplugging the TV. When you had 20 odd Valves in a TV burning away, fires was common place If you broke off the glass top (carefully) and covered the heater with 3in1 oil, you could get a wonderful smoke candle if it was plugged into a valve tester with variable heater voltage. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Max Demian wrote:
Are you sure it's really going into standby? If during the power up sequence from what you think is standby, you see a black screen with a progress bar and "Resuming Windows", then it's actually been hibernating. "Resuming" in Windows language means recovering from hibernation, which will mean reading lots of stuff from the disk. No, it talks about going into and out of standby. And you have to explicitly enable hibernate in XP. That's what I thought. I have not, to my knowledge, enabled anything to make my laptop hibernate after it has been in standby for about 5 minutes, and cannot find any settings for it, yet this is what it does. I know that this is what it is doing because the next time I switch it on, I get the "resuming Windows" message. It may have started off in standby but it has subsequently gone into hibernation. Are you certain this is not what your computer is doing? Another possibility, if your computer really is only going into standby, is that it is a bit short of RAM and so using some swap space on the disk. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roderick Stewart" wrote in
message .myzen.co.uk... In article , Max Demian wrote: Are you sure it's really going into standby? If during the power up sequence from what you think is standby, you see a black screen with a progress bar and "Resuming Windows", then it's actually been hibernating. "Resuming" in Windows language means recovering from hibernation, which will mean reading lots of stuff from the disk. No, it talks about going into and out of standby. And you have to explicitly enable hibernate in XP. That's what I thought. I have not, to my knowledge, enabled anything to make my laptop hibernate after it has been in standby for about 5 minutes, and cannot find any settings for it, yet this is what it does. I know that this is what it is doing because the next time I switch it on, I get the "resuming Windows" message. It may have started off in standby but it has subsequently gone into hibernation. Are you certain this is not what your computer is doing? As I said, in XP you have to explicitly enable hibernate (Control Panel-Power Options-Hibernate) and the OS allocates a chunk of HD equal to the physical memory, and the "Turn off computer" dialog says you can hibernate by holding down shift while you click Stand by (I think). Another possibility, if your computer really is only going into standby, is that it is a bit short of RAM and so using some swap space on the disk. I have no doubt that it is doing stuff like writing back "dirty pages" - there is certainly disk activity. The question is, why? I accept that standby is a precarious state and a loss of power will lose edited data not written back in the same way as power loss when it is running. -- Max Demian |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How much electricity is my amp using? | Tom | UK home cinema | 1 | January 23rd 05 07:40 PM |
| Transmitting TV over electricity lines | Howard Ino | UK digital tv | 26 | July 18th 04 08:16 PM |
| Transmitting TV over electricity lines | Howard Ino | UK digital tv | 0 | July 14th 04 09:37 PM |
| static electricity problem | Mike Ballard | Home theater (general) | 2 | February 25th 04 09:54 PM |
| Tivo and Electricity | Joan Quinn | Tivo personal television | 23 | January 27th 04 02:26 AM |