The trial in Oslo on 24 hour News Channels.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:58:11 +0100
Charles Ellson wrote:
You mean juvenile offenders and the mentally ill who have murdered people?
So what? I don't have a problem with that. Someones age or mental state does
not excuse murder anymore than being ****ed excuses running someone down in
a car and killing them.

So you agree that killing people is wrong ?

I do? Can you point out exactly where I said that please.

Do you know the significance of placing "?" at the end of a sentence ?

Perfectly. I had assumed you thought I'd mentioned it somewhere hence my
question in return. Clearly you just pulled it out your arse as I suspected.

Killing people is perfectly legitimate in a number of situations such was war,
executions

So as long as the correct ceremonials are performed you see nothing
wrong with killing somebody irrespective of the justification for
doing so ?

Which bit of "Killing people is perfectly legitimate in a number of situations"
are you having a problem with?

Do I think military death in war is acceptable? Yes. Civilian? No.
Do I think executions are acceptable for certain crimes? Yes. In principal.

B2003

On Monday, April 23rd, 2012, at 09:10:31h +0000, Boltar 2003 wrote:

Do I think military death in war is acceptable? Yes. Civilian? No.

What about civilian spies or civilians who engage in acts of warfare
eg assassination and/or sabotage?

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:18:50 +0000 (UTC)
J G Miller wrote:
On Monday, April 23rd, 2012, at 09:10:31h +0000, Boltar 2003 wrote:

Do I think military death in war is acceptable? Yes. Civilian? No.

What about civilian spies or civilians who engage in acts of warfare
eg assassination and/or sabotage?

Well if you take on that sort of role you're not really a civilian anymore
are you? So yes.

B2003

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:31:26 +0000 (UTC), d
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:18:50 +0000 (UTC)
J G Miller wrote:
On Monday, April 23rd, 2012, at 09:10:31h +0000, Boltar 2003 wrote:

Do I think military death in war is acceptable? Yes. Civilian? No.

What about civilian spies or civilians who engage in acts of warfare
eg assassination and/or sabotage?

Well if you take on that sort of role you're not really a civilian anymore
are you? So yes.

Are you by any chance planning a plane-spotting holiday in Greece ?

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:16:38 +0100
Charles Ellson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:31:26 +0000 (UTC), d
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:18:50 +0000 (UTC)
J G Miller wrote:
On Monday, April 23rd, 2012, at 09:10:31h +0000, Boltar 2003 wrote:

Do I think military death in war is acceptable? Yes. Civilian? No.

What about civilian spies or civilians who engage in acts of warfare
eg assassination and/or sabotage?

Well if you take on that sort of role you're not really a civilian anymore
are you? So yes.

Are you by any chance planning a plane-spotting holiday in Greece ?

If you're referring to this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/d...d_2518000/2518
385.stm

the fact that they weren't imprisoned for 20 years says it all. If they had
been real spies and been shot then too bad, occupational hazard.

B2003

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:54:42 +0000 (UTC), d
wrote:

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:16:38 +0100
Charles Ellson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:31:26 +0000 (UTC), d
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:18:50 +0000 (UTC)
J G Miller wrote:
On Monday, April 23rd, 2012, at 09:10:31h +0000, Boltar 2003 wrote:

Do I think military death in war is acceptable? Yes. Civilian? No.

What about civilian spies or civilians who engage in acts of warfare
eg assassination and/or sabotage?

Well if you take on that sort of role you're not really a civilian anymore
are you? So yes.

Are you by any chance planning a plane-spotting holiday in Greece ?

If you're referring to this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/d...d_2518000/2518
385.stm

the fact that they weren't imprisoned for 20 years says it all. If they had
been real spies and been shot then too bad, occupational hazard.

What is the difference between a real spy and an imaginary one ?