![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 01/01/2011 16:21, Dave Saville wrote:
Anyone had experiance of the 35mm film and slide scanners that the like of Maplins sell? Looking for a self containd type that records to SD card. No way will I find drivers for a connected one for my old OS/2 system. :-) TIA Go with Bill's suggestion. The results will be miles better. I copied some 8mm film that way. Project onto a screen and tape the results with a camcorder. The results were excellent, especially with the commentary that the family added. Dave -- Blow my nose to email me |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 16:30:33 UTC, Bill Wright wrote:
Dave Saville wrote: Anyone had experiance of the 35mm film and slide scanners that the like of Maplins sell? Looking for a self containd type that records to SD card. No way will I find drivers for a connected one for my old OS/2 system. :-) TIA Best way is to project the image and photograph it. I can give you details if you like. Bill Please. -- Regards Dave Saville |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 22:33:44 UTC, Java Jive
wrote: Dual-boot with Linux? Linux is usually quite good for old drivers, that is assuming that drivers for the hardware were ever written in the first place. Often they are, sometimes they are not. You could put a toe in the water by trying out a live cd. I have a linux laptop - but I don't really want *another* scanner. I have a good SCSI one that does work on OS/2. The mistake I made was not buying the slide attachment for it when it was new :-( -- Regards Dave Saville |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Saville wrote:
I don't really want *another* scanner. I have a good SCSI one [] The mistake I made was not buying the slide attachment for it when it was new eBay? |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 at 14:48:21h +0000, Dave Saville wrote:
The mistake I made was not buying the slide attachment for it when it was new :-( Do you check eBay (or similar sites) from time to time to see if anybody is selling one "pre-owned"? |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:14:14 UTC, J G Miller wrote:
On Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 at 14:48:21h +0000, Dave Saville wrote: The mistake I made was not buying the slide attachment for it when it was new :-( Do you check eBay (or similar sites) from time to time to see if anybody is selling one "pre-owned"? No - I think I might try Bill's idea of projecting and re photographing - when he posts his "how to" :-) -- Regards Dave Saville |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Saville wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 16:30:33 UTC, Bill Wright wrote: Dave Saville wrote: Anyone had experiance of the 35mm film and slide scanners that the like of Maplins sell? Looking for a self containd type that records to SD card. No way will I find drivers for a connected one for my old OS/2 system. :-) TIA Best way is to project the image and photograph it. I can give you details if you like. Bill Please. Take care to get the projector dead square on to the screen. Obviously it must be opposite the midpoint of the projected picture. Project at a reasonable distance (I found 2m best. That gave an image about 1m across.) If the picture on the screen is out of focus at the edges stop the lens down if it will. If not consider a home made aperture stop -- a matt black washer-shaped piece of aluminium (etc) immediately behind the lens. Card will catch fire! Slide popping is a problem. Auto focus helps of course. If it's a zoom lens on the projector find a focal length where pincushion-type distortion is at a minimum and the illumination is most equal. This likely to be at about the middle of the zoom range. If the projector gives uneven illumination across the picture you'll never get good results. Mount the camera as close as possible to being on the same axis as the projector. A good way is to put the projector on a table and put the camera on a tripod so it's immediately above the projector. That needs a Benbo-type tripod though. I suppose you could use a shelf unit for projector and camera. Although you can theoretically have the camera and projector at different distances from the screen I find it's easier to have them one above the other. If the camera has a zoom lens (only) find a focal length where pincushion-type distortion is at a minimum. This likely to be at about the middle of the zoom range. It it works out wrong for the filling the screen you might have to fiddle with the projector zoom or the distances. Set the camera to the highest resolution and minimum compression feasible. If the camera has a PAL output it can be useful to monitor it on a telly. Experiment to find out if the viewfinder is accurate. Allow a small border around the slides; trim it off later. Take the shots with absolutely no extraneous lights on. Total darkness. Minimise reflections from screen to walls/ceiling and back again as these reduce the depth of the blacks unevenly. Auto exposure will probably be OK. Experiment with spot, general, etc settings. Slides vary a lot in density so exposure adjustment is constant if on manual. If the camera has a contrast setting consider putting it on low to give more exposure latitude, then correct in Photoshop. Also consider exposure bracketing, plus or minus one stop. It's important that you capture the full dynamic range of the slide. If this means that the results look flat use Photoshop's controls to correct. The worst thing is to have the highlights burnt out or the shadows black. For copying colour, project nothing (white screen) and set the camera's colour balance accordingly. If the camera won't do that try the settings for tungsten light. There will probably be several. Ultimately, correct balance in Photoshop, but get it as good as you can in the camera first. Use a long exposure and a small aperture. Depth of field is important, surprisingly. Even monochrome originals look better if copied in colour. You can always convert to mono or sepia later. Have a short session then assess the results critically. Hope this helps. Bill |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Saville wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:14:14 UTC, J G Miller wrote: On Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 at 14:48:21h +0000, Dave Saville wrote: The mistake I made was not buying the slide attachment for it when it was new :-( Do you check eBay (or similar sites) from time to time to see if anybody is selling one "pre-owned"? No - I think I might try Bill's idea of projecting and re photographing - when he posts his "how to" :-) It's done, it's done! Bill |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 16:30:33 +0000, Bill Wright wrote: Dave Saville wrote: Anyone had experiance of the 35mm film and slide scanners that the like of Maplins sell? Looking for a self containd type that records to SD card. No way will I find drivers for a connected one for my old OS/2 system. :-) TIA The Lidl GBP35 one was unevenly lit, noisy, oversaturated by miles and could not focus the whole frame at once. Otherwise it was fine. I took it back. I use a Canon CanoScan 4400F flatbed scanner with negative and slide feature built in. Great results |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Wright wrote (apparently) in uk.tech.digital-tv on Sun 02 Jan
2011 19:00:38: Dave Saville wrote: On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 16:30:33 UTC, Bill Wright wrote: Dave Saville wrote: Anyone had experiance of the 35mm film and slide scanners that the like of Maplins sell? Looking for a self containd type that records to SD card. No way will I find drivers for a connected one for my old OS/2 system. :-) TIA Best way is to project the image and photograph it. I can give you details if you like. Bill Please. Take care to get the projector dead square on to the screen. Obviously it must be opposite the midpoint of the projected picture. [Snipped...] Bill Bill, thanks for that. Some good tips I may well need later in the year to do something with things I've inherited. Couple of things I've noted with a couple of cameras I've used. Some Canon models can be connected to the PC and controlled remotely, including taking the shot - once the settings are right it's fairly easy to get through a number of shots like this. An external power supply might be useful for this though. Also when taking the shots, even if the camera is tripod-mounted, if there is a self-timer setting, this will prevent any camera shake from pressing the shutter button down fully. I tried some long exposure night-time shots recently and the 2 second self-timer delay was very handy. Regards and Happy New Year to all. -- MrGuest Always, seemingly, on the road to nowhere |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E4 Film 4 etc ? | Graham2 | UK sky | 5 | May 27th 08 09:21 AM |
| HD Film | AviatorJen | High definition TV | 0 | June 20th 07 12:49 AM |
| Film 4 | [email protected] | UK digital tv | 11 | August 1st 06 08:12 PM |
| IFC: INDEPENDENT FILM CHANNEL poor film quality | Jeff | High definition TV | 3 | January 11th 05 07:01 PM |
| Film Four | Pam Gasson | UK sky | 2 | November 30th 04 11:32 PM |