![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Woody" wrote in message news:[email protected] " wrote in message ... On Jun 2, 10:57 pm, tony sayer wrote: In article [email protected], Woody scribeth thus "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article [email protected], Woody wrote: Band 1 has never been used for TV in the UK. AIRI Band 1 was something like 41-68MHz, certainly 'E' band PMR was and still is (technically) 68-88MHz although 87.5-88 was cleared a few years ago to permit short term VHF broadcast stations (like for the Great Yorkshire Show, etc.) Although some people may have used frequencies in what we would class as Band 1 it was never available for PMR use in the UK. The US used to use frequencies in the 35-40MHz region for police radio after the war which continued until the 70's, but most of that band un the UK was allocated for MoD use. The use of 47 MHz that I mentioned was in the UK and quite legal, i.e. licensed. |
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article [email protected], Woody
scribeth thus " wrote in message ... On Jun 2, 10:57 pm, tony sayer wrote: In article [email protected], Woody scribeth thus "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article [email protected], Woody wrote: Band 1 has never been used for TV in the UK. Eh? -- Sorry, senior moment. Should have read '...never been used for PMR in the UK.' Has .. but very limited use but darn sarff, and IIRC now fallen out of favour... -- Tony Sayer Wouldn't all that PMR stuff just above the old ch B5 be within Band I? Bill AIRI Band 1 was something like 41-68MHz, certainly 'E' band PMR was and still is (technically) 68-88MHz although 87.5-88 was cleared a few years ago to permit short term VHF broadcast stations (like for the Great Yorkshire Show, etc.) Don't remember any fuss info re clearing that bit of Band 2 which would have been 87.6 to 88 there was a lot of fuss getting rid of mobile TX from 105 to 107.9 ... Although some people may have used frequencies in what we would class as Band 1 it was never available for PMR use in the UK. Well they were using Band 1 for PMR a while ago in the London area but it wasn't that successful. Come to think of it that was being used for CBS (Common Base Stations) a type of shared radio. There was a bloke at Ofcom who's moved on now who would have been able to give a fair bit of detail on that but I've lost touch with him now.. The main reason was lack of Type approved kit IIRC... The US used to use frequencies in the 35-40MHz region for police radio after the war which continued until the 70's, but most of that band un the UK was allocated for MoD use. And a lot of others;!.. -- Tony Sayer |
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , MB
scribeth thus "tony sayer" wrote in message ... In article , charles scribeth thus In article , Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , tony sayer wrote: Beg to differ with my 'learned friend but as far as I remember neither Band 1 or 3 were sold off at all unlike cellular licences.. FWIW Band 1 has hardly any PMR thereon due to the absurdly long aerials required, the impossibility of using portables and the lack of type approved equipment/s.. Band 3 is of course used by some PMR, bus and Trains and data systems tho some of these especially the trains will migrate over to GSM/R in time.. And ofd course DAB.. Not a lot of demand for licences there it seems.. But none of it was sold off as such... -- Tony Sayer We used 47 MHz at one time, Was this for PMR land mobile use?.. the aerials were not particularly "absurd", Bad enough!, you won't get yer average cabbie putting up with a low band whip when he can have a High band one;!... range was great most of the time though we used to get interference from Russian fishing boats sometimes. Pye Westminsters were used. Other low VHF frequencies have been used for PMR at times. -- Tony Sayer Bancom Communications U.K. Tel+44 1223 566577 Fax+44 1223 566588 4 Wingate close, Cambridge, England, CB2 9HW E-Mail |
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Paul Martin" wrote in message ... In article [email protected], Woody wrote: Band 1 has never been used for TV in the UK. Not only has Band I been used, but in double sideband mode (Ally Pally only), and almost all the BBC's 405 line transmissions were in Band I. MF has been used for TV, too. -- Paul Martin I seem to remember in the biography of Armstrong that he used Band II for FM radio because of availability but later wished he could have had FM radio around Band I and TV broadcasting around Band II because the increased susceptibility to long distance propagation on lower frequencies would not have affected radio as much as TV. |
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
"tony sayer" wrote in message ... In article , MB scribeth thus We used 47 MHz at one time, Was this for PMR land mobile use?.. the aerials were not particularly "absurd", Bad enough!, you won't get yer average cabbie putting up with a low band whip when he can have a High band one;!... BBC RT use, we had a talk-through system from a 141 MHz channel which could be activated by a SELCALL system. The 47 MHz part was fixed so it was a folded dipole on the tower but I have used a 50 MHz quarter wave and it is not particular unwieldy especially when you consider many taxis at that time were using 70/80 MHz anyway. I heard that someone in the power industry was trying to get a temporary network set up around 50 MHz for the night of the Millennium to enable direct comms between various points in the system independent of any hall-top sites or the telephone system. The BBC also tried out a mobile HF comms system in the UK for a time, there were several channels allocated for mobile use. |
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
|
"tony sayer" wrote in message
... In article , charles scribeth thus In article , Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , tony sayer wrote: snip FWIW Band 1 has hardly any PMR thereon due to the absurdly long aerials required, the impossibility of using portables and the lack of type approved equipment/s.. Wot like this? http://www.doubleradius.com/Motorola...and-16-Channel 35 to 50MHz is heavily used in the US especially by police depts, just not here. Steve Terry -- Welcome Sign-up Bonus of £1 when you signup free at: http://www.topcashback.co.uk/ref/G4WWK |
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Steve Terry
scribeth thus "tony sayer" wrote in message ... In article , charles scribeth thus In article , Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , tony sayer wrote: snip FWIW Band 1 has hardly any PMR thereon due to the absurdly long aerials required, the impossibility of using portables and the lack of type approved equipment/s.. Wot like this? http://www.doubleradius.com/Motorola...dio-35-50-MHz- Lowband-16-Channel 35 to 50MHz is heavily used in the US especially by police depts, just not here. No there not at all efficient even at 77 odd MHz theres no comparison with a VHF hi band portable on say 170 MHz. In around 25 years of PMR operation we must have sold around 3 or 4 handportables for VHF Lo;!. And a helluva lot on VHF Hi and UHF 1 and 2. And thats not just because of frequency availability its down to performance. VHF Lowband channels some have sod all users on nation-wide even!.... .. Steve Terry -- Tony Sayer |
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , MB
scribeth thus "tony sayer" wrote in message ... In article , MB scribeth thus We used 47 MHz at one time, Was this for PMR land mobile use?.. the aerials were not particularly "absurd", Bad enough!, you won't get yer average cabbie putting up with a low band whip when he can have a High band one;!... BBC RT use, we had a talk-through system from a 141 MHz channel which could be activated by a SELCALL system. Rather unusual practice, in the UK normal CTCSS would be used works very well... The 47 MHz part was fixed so it was a folded dipole on the tower but I have used a 50 MHz quarter wave and it is not particular unwieldy especially when you consider many taxis at that time were using 70/80 MHz anyway. Well lets say 50 Mc/s thats 1350 mm not insignificant and if you put a loading coil on that its efficiency is much less as the receive will be 13.5 or 10 MHz away.. We've had transit vans on Lowband and lorries too, average aerial life is around a couple of weeks even spring loaded ones!.. I heard that someone in the power industry was trying to get a temporary network set up around 50 MHz for the night of the Millennium to enable direct comms between various points in the system independent of any hall-top sites or the telephone system. Blimey haven't they got enough spectrum already;?.. Just dragging it back to broadcast there are some Audio point to point and Talkback links in there around 48 to 52 MHz odd.. http://www.jfmg.co.uk/pages/freq/ground/40_100mhz.htm The BBC also tried out a mobile HF comms system in the UK for a time, there were several channels allocated for mobile use. -- Tony Sayer |
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 29 May 2010 15:20:00 +0100, tony sayer
wrote: There's enough of a hill that we need either a stacked pair like me and some of the neighbours or a Monstrosity Pigeon Perch like some of the others here but even that doesn't help in other parts of the town. If they could repurpose some of the Orfordness Project they could probably get a good signal facing inland which would fill some of the gaps. Humm on second thoughts you are a bit shadowed there according to our terrain set. Course thats not a very tall mast there (Taccy) and your up in the 700 odd MHz region group C so perhaps to be expected. Drop me a valid e-mail and you can have the image..... I think I already have one from the site whose url I completely forget but yes the signal just makes it over the hill here but not in other parts of the town, be interesting to see if DSO turns up the power enough to alleviate this Still haven't been to Southwold for a while now the Adnams just across the road from the brewery is excellent ![]() That's the old brewery I presume? The new one is out of town with a grass roof. Just shows how long ago it was;!.. Perhaps an expedition is in order ..I would. The pier has been pretty much reconstructed too. Sometimes Southwold and Orford can become overfull in the holiday season but there are plenty other places you can go instead. Local places for local people . . . Tell me about it I live in Cambridge we know what tourists are like;!... I used to be one once G I had my honeymoon in Suffolk. I no longer have the wife and now I live here. Go figure. It's where we came from about three generations back and I feel like I've come home. You can always tell the tourists "I don't care if you're an 18 wheeler with three cars behind you, I SHALL not reverse my Volvo" and if you pull off the road to let them through they NEVER thank you (locals might stop for a chat . . .) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT - House of Lords inquiry into digital radio switchover | DAB sounds worse than FM[_2_] | UK digital tv | 1 | January 28th 10 10:33 AM |
| Radio digital switchover proposed | Java Jive | UK digital tv | 11 | June 24th 08 10:51 PM |
| Thanks for help with Poor Digital Reception | entropycity | UK digital tv | 2 | October 21st 05 11:03 AM |
| poor digital reception (second try) | entropycity | UK digital tv | 20 | October 20th 05 09:49 PM |
| poor digital tv reception | entropycity | UK digital tv | 13 | October 19th 05 06:21 AM |