Power line adaptors

"Brian Gregory [UK]" wrote in message
...
There's really no need to take so much delight in other peoples problems.

I expect your mother bullied you when you were a child and you've never
got over it.

--

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.


I really don't give a dam. I had radio system security on my car and when
the local council gave authorisation for a mobile phone company to install
its aerials on a neighbouring building my radio equipment started playing
up. A call to the council replied, they are paying us big bucks so **** you
jack, change your radio equipment.

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:01:34 GMT, "Brian Gaff"
wrote:

Reading between the lines I get the feeling that most of the engineers feel
the offcom decision makers have been caught asleep at the wheel and these
devices should have been jumped on at the start.

In reality Ofcom didn't have a lot of choice.

It followed the pattern of CB, MF cordless phones, and more recently
low power FM transmitters, where the things are freely available
elsewhere in the world and people will use them here regardless.

Provided no interference will be caused to a significant user (as
happened with 'family radios' imported from the US affecting the
emergency services), the simplest administrative solution to illegal
use is just to legalise them. No-one will hear a few radio hams
grumblng will they?

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:01:34 GMT, "Brian Gaff"
wrote:

Reading between the lines I get the feeling that most of the engineers
feel
the offcom decision makers have been caught asleep at the wheel and these
devices should have been jumped on at the start.

In reality Ofcom didn't have a lot of choice.

It followed the pattern of CB, MF cordless phones, and more recently
low power FM transmitters, where the things are freely available
elsewhere in the world and people will use them here regardless.

Provided no interference will be caused to a significant user (as
happened with 'family radios' imported from the US affecting the
emergency services), the simplest administrative solution to illegal
use is just to legalise them. No-one will hear a few radio hams
grumblng will they?

that right after all they have had enough time knob twiddling...hare breaker
one big daddy its the teddy rolling 10 4 and there's a bug on yer bumper big
buddy.

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:08:47 -0000, In400metreskeepright
wrote:

Provided no interference will be caused to a significant user (as
happened with 'family radios' imported from the US affecting the
emergency services), the simplest administrative solution to illegal
use is just to legalise them. No-one will hear a few radio hams
grumblng will they?

that right after all they have had enough time knob twiddling...hare breaker
one big daddy its the teddy rolling 10 4 and there's a bug on yer bumper big
buddy.

Ah, another ignorant idiot.

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message om...
See my other post earlier. Basically, they do not cause what is defined as interference to any service meant for the uK licenced
by the UK, This is why they have ham band filters.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:

Well as a licensed amateur of 40 years, I have always been under the impression
that we have little or no expectation of a remedy in cases of interference to our
receivers.

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%

"In400metreskeepright" wrote in message ...

"Brian Gregory [UK]" wrote in message ...
There's really no need to take so much delight in other peoples problems.

I expect your mother bullied you when you were a child and you've never got over it.

--

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.


I really don't give a dam. I had radio system security on my car and when the local council gave authorisation for a mobile phone
company to install its aerials on a neighbouring building my radio equipment started playing up. A call to the council replied,
they are paying us big bucks so **** you jack, change your radio equipment.

Let's peruse this a little if you don't mind.
First, what exactly is "radio system security"?

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:52:06 GMT, Paul Ratcliffe
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:08:47 -0000, In400metreskeepright
wrote:

Provided no interference will be caused to a significant user (as
happened with 'family radios' imported from the US affecting the
emergency services), the simplest administrative solution to illegal
use is just to legalise them. No-one will hear a few radio hams
grumblng will they?

that right after all they have had enough time knob twiddling...hare breaker
one big daddy its the teddy rolling 10 4 and there's a bug on yer bumper big
buddy.

Ah, another ignorant idiot.

Ignoring the idiots Paul, if you are one of those affected by the
bureaucratic issue-dodgers you have my sympathies.

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:34:16 +0000, lid
wrote:

Provided no interference will be caused to a significant user (as
happened with 'family radios' imported from the US affecting the
emergency services), the simplest administrative solution to illegal
use is just to legalise them. No-one will hear a few radio hams
grumblng will they?

that right after all they have had enough time knob twiddling...hare breaker
one big daddy its the teddy rolling 10 4 and there's a bug on yer bumper big
buddy.

Ah, another ignorant idiot.

Ignoring the idiots Paul, if you are one of those affected by the
bureaucratic issue-dodgers you have my sympathies.

I'm not, but at least I have some idea what amateur radio is and isn't
(in the UK at least). The previous poster seems to have his US CB blinkers
on.

"In400metreskeepright" wrote in message
...
I really don't give a dam. I had radio system security on my car and when
the local council gave authorisation for a mobile phone company to install
its aerials on a neighbouring building my radio equipment started playing
up. A call to the council replied, they are paying us big bucks so ****
you jack, change your radio equipment.

Well you would have my sympathy if you'd not shown you don't deserve it.

--

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:47:55 GMT, Paul Ratcliffe
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:34:16 +0000, lid
wrote:

Provided no interference will be caused to a significant user (as
happened with 'family radios' imported from the US affecting the
emergency services), the simplest administrative solution to illegal
use is just to legalise them. No-one will hear a few radio hams
grumblng will they?

that right after all they have had enough time knob twiddling...hare breaker
one big daddy its the teddy rolling 10 4 and there's a bug on yer bumper big
buddy.

Ah, another ignorant idiot.

Ignoring the idiots Paul, if you are one of those affected by the
bureaucratic issue-dodgers you have my sympathies.

I'm not, but at least I have some idea what amateur radio is and isn't
(in the UK at least). The previous poster seems to have his US CB blinkers
on.

...and he is a perfect illustration of why Ofcom will always take the
easy way out. The general public have no interest in protecting a
minority that they don't understand.