![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maurice wrote:
On Dec 17, 9:08 am, Mark Carver wrote: I'm sure they were, because at that stage no idiot producer has got hold of the images, chucked away every other field, added grain, and stuffed them through a filter to make them look 'arty'. You watch "Strictly Come Dancing" don't you. No, my wife does, I just 'observe' the transmission technically. Good example though, live portions look good, pre-recorded sections look crap. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
jamie powell wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message ... I totally disagree. I think there will be some people who're knowledgable about picture quality, so what you say doesn't apply to them. Then there will be people who thought to themselves "this doesn't look as good as it used to do" but wouldn't know why - until they stumbled across the BBC Internet blogs discussing it. Only a minority have an accurate perception of picture/sound quality. You obviously have to pretend otherwise though, in order to justify your little DAB "campaign". Lots of people aren't happy with the sound quality on DAB, just like a lot of people aren't happy about the reduction in quality on the BBC HD channel. Trying to talk the issue down won't actually alter this. This is a good example of why I don't believe that you're a 19/20 years old student. Why would you "recall no complaints" being made in 1999 if you were only 9 years old? 9 year old kids boys play with Action Man or similar. They do not know anything about TV picture quality, let alone the number of complaints the BBC will have received about it. You have no idea... I was a really weird kid. Pure ********. You've been sussed, Dave. Sorry, but you've come out with a load of different things that simply don't stack up. You are Dave the Gasman from Grimsby, and I claim my five pounds. I thought we'd established my true identity already - I am Bill Wright's alter ego - the one and only outlet for his years of repressed homosexuality, and a means of atonement for the social persecution he feared so much in his youth. More diversionary ********. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info Check that I haven't accused James "pathological liar" Cridland of being biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio: Tick Check that I've deleted all racist and/or homophobic language: Tick Check that there are no funeral magazines and/or addresses of senior members of the DAB industry included: Tick Check that I've observed Sean "My Personal Obsessive Stalker" Inglis's (Usenet username: seani) "How Steve Must Behave on Usenet Rulebook (Totally Inapplicable to Other Users Edition)": Tick |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message ... Lots of people aren't happy with the sound quality on DAB, just like a lot of people aren't happy about the reduction in quality on the BBC HD channel. Trying to talk the issue down won't actually alter this. Oh really, is that so... What about SD television quality then - 56% of UK households now have a flatscreen HD-Ready TV, but 91% of UK households have neither HDTV nor Blu-Ray sources. So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better. This is a good example of why I don't believe that you're a 19/20 years old student. Why would you "recall no complaints" being made in 1999 if you were only 9 years old? 9 year old kids boys play with Action Man or similar. They do not know anything about TV picture quality, let alone the number of complaints the BBC will have received about it. You have no idea... I was a really weird kid. Pure ********. You've been sussed, Dave. Sorry, but you've come out with a load of different things that simply don't stack up. You are Dave the Gasman from Grimsby, and I claim my five pounds. I thought we'd established my true identity already - I am Bill Wright's alter ego - the one and only outlet for his years of repressed homosexuality, and a means of atonement for the social persecution he feared so much in his youth. More diversionary ********. Okay then ... *clears throat* ... I am Dave the Gasman from Grimsby. Happy? |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
jamie powell wrote: You have no idea... I was a really weird kid. What do you mean - was? -- *Preserve wildlife - Go pickle a squirrel* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
"jamie powell" wrote in message ... What about SD television quality then - 56% of UK households now have a flatscreen HD-Ready TV, but 91% of UK households have neither HDTV nor Blu-Ray sources. So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better. A typical Joe Public thinks he is seeing HD TV. Of course a lot of DVD players upscale. And in my case my built in Freesat tuner is upscaling, well it gives a better picture than Freeview. Regards David |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
jamie powell wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message ... Lots of people aren't happy with the sound quality on DAB, just like a lot of people aren't happy about the reduction in quality on the BBC HD channel. Trying to talk the issue down won't actually alter this. Oh really, is that so... What about SD television quality then - 56% of UK households now have a flatscreen HD-Ready TV, but 91% of UK households have neither HDTV nor Blu-Ray sources. So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better. We're talking about HD quality, which people expect to be better than SD. Try to keep up at the back. This is a good example of why I don't believe that you're a 19/20 years old student. Why would you "recall no complaints" being made in 1999 if you were only 9 years old? 9 year old kids boys play with Action Man or similar. They do not know anything about TV picture quality, let alone the number of complaints the BBC will have received about it. You have no idea... I was a really weird kid. Pure ********. You've been sussed, Dave. Sorry, but you've come out with a load of different things that simply don't stack up. You are Dave the Gasman from Grimsby, and I claim my five pounds. I thought we'd established my true identity already - I am Bill Wright's alter ego - the one and only outlet for his years of repressed homosexuality, and a means of atonement for the social persecution he feared so much in his youth. More diversionary ********. Okay then ... *clears throat* ... I am Dave the Gasman from Grimsby. Happy? Finally. Yes, thank you, Dave. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info Check that I haven't accused James "pathological liar" Cridland of being biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio: Tick Check that I've deleted all racist and/or homophobic language: Tick Check that there are no funeral magazines and/or addresses of senior members of the DAB industry included: Tick Check that I've observed Sean "My Personal Obsessive Stalker" Inglis's (Usenet username: seani) "How Steve Must Behave on Usenet Rulebook (Totally Inapplicable to Other Users Edition)": Tick |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
David wrote: "jamie powell" wrote in message ... What about SD television quality then - 56% of UK households now have a flatscreen HD-Ready TV, but 91% of UK households have neither HDTV nor Blu-Ray sources. So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better. A typical Joe Public thinks he is seeing HD TV. and when stereo "music centres" were first sold many people assumed that the second loudspeaker was for an extension in another room. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message ... So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better. We're talking about HD quality, which people expect to be better than SD. Try to keep up at the back. Nah, we were talking about the public's perceptions of technical quality in general, which is why you mentioned DAB as well. SD could look far, far better than it does on DVB, not that you'd know of course. My original point though, was that the people ranting and raving on the BBC forums are, by enlarge, a massive bunch of fat-fingered, hypocritical ****wits who'll rant on any issue they can find, purely because they enjoy the little rush of power they get each time they hit "Send". |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , jamie powell
wrote: "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message ... So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better. We're talking about HD quality, which people expect to be better than SD. Try to keep up at the back. Nah, we were talking about the public's perceptions of technical quality in general, which is why you mentioned DAB as well. SD could look far, far better than it does on DVB, not that you'd know of course. My original point though, was that the people ranting and raving on the BBC forums are, by enlarge, a massive bunch of fat-fingered, hypocritical ****wits who'll rant on any issue they can find, purely because they enjoy the little rush of power they get each time they hit "Send". ah - all is revealed. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
charles wrote: and when stereo "music centres" were first sold many people assumed that the second loudspeaker was for an extension in another room. By the way most position speakers even now it might as well be. -- *I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Toshiba DLP 52hm95 Picture Quality Issue? | Dark Helmet | High definition TV | 9 | February 6th 06 06:49 PM |
| Picture quality issue.. | arnold evans | High definition TV | 2 | January 29th 05 03:58 PM |
| HDTV Tivo: picture quality issue | Z Man | Tivo personal television | 8 | December 4th 04 09:36 PM |
| Anyone got any good recommedations for A DLP/LCD video projector for home cinema , anything upto £1999.99 , but have read before about excellent sub £1000 models , picture quality is the most important factor to me , any links to reviews etc would | Just Wondering | UK home cinema | 4 | October 27th 04 01:49 PM |
| picture quality issue | Mike Eisler | Tivo personal television | 22 | May 7th 04 07:27 PM |