A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » UK digital tv
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 17th 09, 08:03 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Mark Carver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,528
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue

Maurice wrote:
On Dec 17, 9:08 am, Mark Carver wrote:

I'm sure they were, because at that stage no idiot producer has got hold
of the images, chucked away every other field, added grain, and stuffed
them through a filter to make them look 'arty'.


You watch "Strictly Come Dancing" don't you.


No, my wife does, I just 'observe' the transmission technically.
Good example though, live portions look good, pre-recorded sections look crap.


--
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.

www.paras.org.uk
  #32  
Old December 17th 09, 08:09 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
DAB sounds worse than FM[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue

jamie powell wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...

I totally disagree. I think there will be some people who're knowledgable
about picture quality, so what you say doesn't apply to them. Then there
will be people who thought to themselves "this doesn't look as good as
it used to do" but wouldn't know why - until they stumbled across the
BBC Internet blogs discussing it.


Only a minority have an accurate perception of picture/sound quality.
You obviously have to pretend otherwise though, in order to justify your
little DAB "campaign".



Lots of people aren't happy with the sound quality on DAB, just like a lot
of people aren't happy about the reduction in quality on the BBC HD channel.
Trying to talk the issue down won't actually alter this.


This is a good example of why I don't believe that you're a 19/20 years
old student. Why would you "recall no complaints" being made in 1999 if
you were only 9 years old? 9 year old kids boys play with Action Man or
similar. They do not know anything about TV picture quality, let alone
the number of complaints the BBC will have received about it.


You have no idea... I was a really weird kid.



Pure ********. You've been sussed, Dave.


Sorry, but you've come out with a load of different things that simply
don't stack up. You are Dave the Gasman from Grimsby, and I claim my
five pounds.


I thought we'd established my true identity already - I am Bill Wright's
alter ego - the one and only outlet for his years of repressed
homosexuality, and a means of atonement for the social persecution he
feared so much in his youth.



More diversionary ********.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info

Check that I haven't accused James "pathological liar" Cridland of being
biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio: Tick Check that I've
deleted all racist and/or homophobic language: Tick Check that there are no
funeral magazines and/or addresses of senior members of the DAB industry
included: Tick Check that I've observed Sean "My Personal Obsessive
Stalker" Inglis's (Usenet username: seani) "How Steve Must Behave on Usenet
Rulebook (Totally Inapplicable to Other Users Edition)": Tick


  #33  
Old December 17th 09, 08:31 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
jamie powell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue


"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...

Lots of people aren't happy with the sound quality on DAB, just like a lot of
people aren't happy about the reduction in quality on the BBC HD channel.
Trying to talk the issue down won't actually alter this.


Oh really, is that so...
What about SD television quality then - 56% of UK households now have a
flatscreen HD-Ready TV, but 91% of UK households have neither HDTV nor Blu-Ray
sources.

So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture quality?
Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at 2Mbps,
and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better.





This is a good example of why I don't believe that you're a 19/20 years
old student. Why would you "recall no complaints" being made in 1999 if
you were only 9 years old? 9 year old kids boys play with Action Man or
similar. They do not know anything about TV picture quality, let alone
the number of complaints the BBC will have received about it.


You have no idea... I was a really weird kid.



Pure ********. You've been sussed, Dave.


Sorry, but you've come out with a load of different things that simply
don't stack up. You are Dave the Gasman from Grimsby, and I claim my
five pounds.


I thought we'd established my true identity already - I am Bill Wright's
alter ego - the one and only outlet for his years of repressed
homosexuality, and a means of atonement for the social persecution he
feared so much in his youth.



More diversionary ********.


Okay then ... *clears throat* ... I am Dave the Gasman from Grimsby.

Happy?



  #34  
Old December 17th 09, 09:35 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,883
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue

In article ,
jamie powell wrote:
You have no idea... I was a really weird kid.


What do you mean - was?

--
*Preserve wildlife - Go pickle a squirrel*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #35  
Old December 17th 09, 09:42 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
David
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,392
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue



"jamie powell" wrote in message
...

What about SD television quality then - 56% of UK households now have a
flatscreen HD-Ready TV, but 91% of UK households have neither HDTV nor
Blu-Ray sources.

So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture
quality?
Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at
2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better.


A typical Joe Public thinks he is seeing HD TV.

Of course a lot of DVD players upscale.
And in my case my built in Freesat tuner is upscaling, well it gives a
better picture than Freeview.

Regards
David

  #36  
Old December 17th 09, 09:51 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
DAB sounds worse than FM[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue

jamie powell wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...

Lots of people aren't happy with the sound quality on DAB, just like a
lot of people aren't happy about the reduction in quality on the BBC HD
channel. Trying to talk the issue down won't actually alter this.


Oh really, is that so...
What about SD television quality then - 56% of UK households now have a
flatscreen HD-Ready TV, but 91% of UK households have neither HDTV nor
Blu-Ray sources.

So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture
quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching
broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is
little better.



We're talking about HD quality, which people expect to be better than SD.

Try to keep up at the back.


This is a good example of why I don't believe that you're a 19/20 years
old student. Why would you "recall no complaints" being made in 1999 if
you were only 9 years old? 9 year old kids boys play with Action Man or
similar. They do not know anything about TV picture quality, let alone
the number of complaints the BBC will have received about it.

You have no idea... I was a really weird kid.



Pure ********. You've been sussed, Dave.


Sorry, but you've come out with a load of different things that simply
don't stack up. You are Dave the Gasman from Grimsby, and I claim my
five pounds.

I thought we'd established my true identity already - I am Bill Wright's
alter ego - the one and only outlet for his years of repressed
homosexuality, and a means of atonement for the social persecution he
feared so much in his youth.



More diversionary ********.


Okay then ... *clears throat* ... I am Dave the Gasman from Grimsby.

Happy?



Finally. Yes, thank you, Dave.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info

Check that I haven't accused James "pathological liar" Cridland of being
biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio: Tick Check that I've
deleted all racist and/or homophobic language: Tick Check that there are no
funeral magazines and/or addresses of senior members of the DAB industry
included: Tick Check that I've observed Sean "My Personal Obsessive
Stalker" Inglis's (Usenet username: seani) "How Steve Must Behave on Usenet
Rulebook (Totally Inapplicable to Other Users Edition)": Tick


  #37  
Old December 17th 09, 09:56 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,383
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue

In article ,
David wrote:


"jamie powell" wrote in message
...


What about SD television quality then - 56% of UK households now have a
flatscreen HD-Ready TV, but 91% of UK households have neither HDTV nor
Blu-Ray sources.

So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture
quality?
Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching broadcasts at
2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is little better.


A typical Joe Public thinks he is seeing HD TV.


and when stereo "music centres" were first sold many people assumed that
the second loudspeaker was for an extension in another room.

--
From KT24

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11

  #38  
Old December 17th 09, 10:50 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
jamie powell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue


"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...

So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture
quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching
broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky is
little better.



We're talking about HD quality, which people expect to be better than SD.

Try to keep up at the back.


Nah, we were talking about the public's perceptions of technical quality in
general, which is why you mentioned DAB as well.

SD could look far, far better than it does on DVB, not that you'd know of
course.

My original point though, was that the people ranting and raving on the BBC
forums are, by enlarge, a massive bunch of fat-fingered, hypocritical ****wits
who'll rant on any issue they can find, purely because they enjoy the little
rush of power they get each time they hit "Send".


  #39  
Old December 17th 09, 11:03 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,383
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue

In article , jamie powell
wrote:

"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...

So where's the spate of complaints regarding, say, Freeview's picture
quality? Freeview users are lucky if the channel they're watching
broadcasts at 2Mbps, and yet the platform is still very popular. Sky
is little better.



We're talking about HD quality, which people expect to be better than
SD.

Try to keep up at the back.


Nah, we were talking about the public's perceptions of technical quality
in general, which is why you mentioned DAB as well.


SD could look far, far better than it does on DVB, not that you'd know of
course.


My original point though, was that the people ranting and raving on the
BBC forums are, by enlarge, a massive bunch of fat-fingered,
hypocritical ****wits who'll rant on any issue they can find, purely
because they enjoy the little rush of power they get each time they hit
"Send".


ah - all is revealed.

--
From KT24

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11

  #40  
Old December 18th 09, 12:44 AM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,883
Default Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue

In article ,
charles wrote:
and when stereo "music centres" were first sold many people assumed that
the second loudspeaker was for an extension in another room.


By the way most position speakers even now it might as well be.

--
*I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toshiba DLP 52hm95 Picture Quality Issue? Dark Helmet High definition TV 9 February 6th 06 06:49 PM
Picture quality issue.. arnold evans High definition TV 2 January 29th 05 03:58 PM
HDTV Tivo: picture quality issue Z Man Tivo personal television 8 December 4th 04 09:36 PM
Anyone got any good recommedations for A DLP/LCD video projector for home cinema , anything upto £1999.99 , but have read before about excellent sub £1000 models , picture quality is the most important factor to me , any links to reviews etc would Just Wondering UK home cinema 4 October 27th 04 01:49 PM
picture quality issue Mike Eisler Tivo personal television 22 May 7th 04 07:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.