![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:08:25 +0000, Terry Casey
wrote: However, you said earlier that you are a digital customer of VM, so how would you know what other services they carry unless you are breaking the contract you have with them? There are digital customers who were set up with the ability to view the analogue bypass channels. Quite legitimately, no contract breaking of any kind. -- |
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:38:46 +0000, Terry Casey
wrote: But, unless you've got me completely confused, we were talking about customers with, or migrated to the digital service. AFIAK no DTV STBs have any form of analogue by-pass. Well that is your mistake. Even in situations where the STBs don't have the analogue bypass built in themselves, particularly insistent customers who wanted an analogue bypass had one set up by the installation engineers. (Example: Incoming cable feed to splitter, splitter output 1 to CATV input of set top box, spiltter output 2 to UHF input to set top box. Result: Analogue bypass.) You say "Admittedly I believe ..." so you have based all your posts and arguments in this thread on guesswork and supposition, which you have presented as hard fact and wasted an awful lot of other peoples' time, whether just ploughing through your demented ramblings or attempting to address them. What on earth is your problem, young man? I use phrases like "I think" and "I believe" to indicate that while I know something about the subject, I am not arrogant enough to treat anything I say as if it should be carved onto stone tablets and treated as the final word on the subject. I am always willing to be corrected by those who know better. Sadly, you fail this test. Welcome to my killfile! (I won't bother with New Year's greetings - I wouldn't include the word 'happy' if I did!) Wow, you really are crazy. Ho hum. I'm fairly sure that the world will keep on turning irrespective of your somewhat inexpert opinions. Just because you've screwed a couple of F connectors on a bit of Coax in the past doesn't make you an authority, you know. -- |
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Zero Tolerance
writes Well that is your mistake. Even in situations where the STBs don't have the analogue bypass built in themselves, particularly insistent customers who wanted an analogue bypass had one set up by the installation engineers. (Example: Incoming cable feed to splitter, splitter output 1 to CATV input of set top box, spiltter output 2 to UHF input to set top box. Result: Analogue bypass.) Which UK digital set-top boxes have a 'CATV' and a 'UHF' input? -- Ian |
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:56:45 +0100, J G Miller wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:29:59 +0000, Duncan Corps wrote: It's demonstrably possible to transmit a 16:9 (letterboxed or anamorphic) picture over an analogue system. Some PAL VHS videos did this. Indeed that has been the case with PAL Plus but as far as I am aware only Channel4 bothered to do this, but ceased doing it (maybe when DVB-t transmissions started). So that does not alter the fact that current analog transmissions in the UKofGB&NI only offer a 4:3/14:9 picture, and thus digital cable viewers would be deprived of a 16:9 wide picture if the cable company used the analog broadcast as source material. While all this is true, there's a subtle difference between what's possible and what actually happens. So, strictly speaking, it's not entirely true to say "cable viewers will not get a widescreen picture but only the 4:3/14:9 picture transmitted on analog [sic]." or "digital cable viewers would be deprived of a 16:9 wide picture if the cable company used the analog [sic] broadcast as source material.". They could get a widescreen picture over analogue if someone transmitted one, and there's nothing to stop them doing so. This is another example of people artificially imposing limitations onto the technologies they're using for reasons best known only to themselves. |
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Paul
Martin writes In article , Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Zero Tolerance writes (Example: Incoming cable feed to splitter, splitter output 1 to CATV input of set top box, spiltter output 2 to UHF input to set top box. Result: Analogue bypass.) Which UK digital set-top boxes have a 'CATV' and a 'UHF' input? The Pace models made for NTL/CWC. They modulate their output onto UHF as well as providing a SCART output. Well, I confess that I didn't have that much to do with either NTL's or TW's digital STBs. There was one network where the analogue boxes were fitted with an add-on filtered bypass unit which accepted a UHF feed from an aerial, but I didn't know that any of the digital STBs had an additional UHF input and/or a modulated output. While I agree that these would be 'nice to have' facilities, experience showed that the bypass facilities provided for the analogue boxes tended to be 'network specific'. One manufacturer ended up by making available the proverbial '57 varieties' of add-on bypass units. [OK, maybe I exaggerate a little.] -- Ian |
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul Martin wrote:
In article , Terry Casey wrote: Paul Martin wrote: However VM have taken the trouble to provide analogue versions of six now-only-digital channels on their cable system. I fully expected them to disappear when the off-air analogue signals went off. However, you said earlier that you are a digital customer of VM, so how would you know what other services they carry unless you are breaking the contract you have with them? There's that VHF FM outlet on the wallplate. I have only a hyperband-capable DVD recorder and standard UHF-only TV and VCR. VM (Bolton head end) provides unscrambled analogue signals in the range E22 to E30. What part of the contract am I breaking? Are you accusing me in a roundabout way of having an unauthorised cable box? It was always my understanding that it was a condition of supply that the subscriber was not allowed to connect equipment directly to any part of the VM network, other than via a VM STB or Modem. It was certainly spelt out very clearly in T&C of my first cable employer (ELT, later encom, Bell Cablemedia, Cable & Wireless Communications and then NTL.) The one exception to this is the FM feed which, on the outlet boxes I've had dealings with, have BII band-pass filters fitted on the FM outlet. Any other form of connection could result in signal from the subscriber's equipment/installation being injected back into the network. Remember that, for interactive and internet services, the subscriber feed effectively has a direct connection back to the headend equipment between 5MHz and 65MHz, so there is a very good reason! Terry |
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Zero Tolerance writes Well that is your mistake. Even in situations where the STBs don't have the analogue bypass built in themselves, particularly insistent customers who wanted an analogue bypass had one set up by the installation engineers. (Example: Incoming cable feed to splitter, splitter output 1 to CATV input of set top box, spiltter output 2 to UHF input to set top box. Result: Analogue bypass.) Which UK digital set-top boxes have a 'CATV' and a 'UHF' input? None that I know of but some cablecos did provide UHF/CATV combiners with suitable filtering for analogue set tops so that the subscriber's aerial could be combined with the STB output. There were about 3 different versions, I think, to cater for different transmitter groups and STB output channels. No doubt some of these are still around but the post doesn't read as that is the case. As I said in another post, Zero Tolerance appears to make up a new scenario with every new post as 'evidence' to support his latest claim. Terry |
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul Martin wrote:
In article , Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Zero Tolerance writes (Example: Incoming cable feed to splitter, splitter output 1 to CATV input of set top box, spiltter output 2 to UHF input to set top box. Result: Analogue bypass.) Which UK digital set-top boxes have a 'CATV' and a 'UHF' input? The Pace models made for NTL/CWC. They modulate their output onto UHF as well as providing a SCART output. Ah yes! You are quite right! I've just taken a look at one! Terry |
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
|
Terry Casey wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Zero Tolerance writes Well that is your mistake. Even in situations where the STBs don't have the analogue bypass built in themselves, particularly insistent customers who wanted an analogue bypass had one set up by the installation engineers. (Example: Incoming cable feed to splitter, splitter output 1 to CATV input of set top box, spiltter output 2 to UHF input to set top box. Result: Analogue bypass.) Which UK digital set-top boxes have a 'CATV' and a 'UHF' input? None that I know of but some cablecos did provide UHF/CATV combiners with suitable filtering for analogue set tops so that the subscriber's aerial could be combined with the STB output. There were about 3 different versions, I think, to cater for different transmitter groups and STB output channels. No doubt some of these are still around but the post doesn't read as that is the case. As I said in another post, Zero Tolerance appears to make up a new scenario with every new post as 'evidence' to support his latest claim. However, as Paul Martin has reminded me, there was such a DTV STB so, perhaps, in this instance he is right! Terry |
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:41:21 +0000, Terry Casey
wrote: It was always my understanding that it was a condition of supply that the subscriber was not allowed to connect equipment directly to any part of the VM network, other than via a VM STB or Modem. It was certainly spelt out very clearly in T&C of my first cable employer (ELT, later encom, Bell Cablemedia, Cable & Wireless Communications and then NTL.) Sadly "your understanding" is not correct, as a quick read of Virgin Media's terms and conditions indicate: http://allyours.virginmedia.com/html...ble/terms.html Virgin Media's terms and conditions, in any case, only apply to customers who enter into a contract with them - so, again, any such non-existent "musn't connect anything to our network" prohibition could not be enforced against people who were not VM customers but who have live cable outlets poking through their walls. Perhaps as part of a MATV system. -- |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| any firm date in july for film four changes? | Felix Martin | UK sky | 1 | June 27th 06 10:27 PM |
| Projectors, Screens, Cable, ect... | Joe Shmo | Home theater (general) | 0 | December 18th 05 05:56 AM |
| Old Firm fans face action over TV con | Jim Mason | UK digital tv | 8 | November 24th 05 11:19 AM |
| Digital v analogue cable | Scott | UK home cinema | 15 | October 28th 05 05:34 PM |
| Digital Cable - Analogue Cable | Neil Donovan | High definition TV | 3 | November 27th 03 07:05 PM |