![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stephen" wrote in message ... In article , Dr Zoidberg wrote: As there are no full HD cathode ray tube model TV's on the market (AFAIK) is that a realistic comparison? Samsung did make a HD CRT for a while but discontinued it ages ago. That would have been this one then... http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-WS32.../dp/B000FMRXPI Paul |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Stephen wrote:
Most the HD displays at trade shows in the 1980s used CRTs, some of them about 40" as I recall. That seemed to me then, and still does, to be about the smallest screen size where the extra detail would be worth the bother. Try connecting an old VGA ony (480 lines) monitor to a PC and see what a difference losing 50% of the lines in HD makes. last time i tried this windows didnt like it even during the setup process..... Granted a computer screen is working with a different type of source material. Indeed. And typically it will be a great deal closer to the viewer. In other words, it is a completely different situation. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article en.co.uk,
Roderick Stewart wrote: In article , Stephen wrote: Most the HD displays at trade shows in the 1980s used CRTs, some of them about 40" as I recall. That seemed to me then, and still does, to be about the smallest screen size where the extra detail would be worth the bother. Try connecting an old VGA ony (480 lines) monitor to a PC and see what a difference losing 50% of the lines in HD makes. last time i tried this windows didnt like it even during the setup process..... Granted a computer screen is working with a different type of source material. Indeed. And typically it will be a great deal closer to the viewer. In other words, it is a completely different situation. Is there a 'typical' viewing distance from a TV? I'd say it depends on the room. So comments like 'HD isn't worthwhile on anything smaller than 45" or whatever are meaningless. -- *A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Granted a computer screen is working with a different type of source material. Indeed. And typically it will be a great deal closer to the viewer. In other words, it is a completely different situation. Is there a 'typical' viewing distance from a TV? I'd say it depends on the room. So comments like 'HD isn't worthwhile on anything smaller than 45" or whatever are meaningless. A TV set of any sort is used for looking at moving pictures. Whatever the screen size, I think most people would want to watch from a distance where the whole picture can be seen at once without the need to keep moving one's head, otherwise it would become tiring pretty quickly. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for Beginner Information | A. Prock | Satellite tvro | 2 | August 1st 06 12:59 PM |
| Beginner DVR Questions | My Comb | Tivo personal television | 45 | November 25th 05 09:52 PM |
| Repost for a bit of advice for a beginner. | Crag | UK digital tv | 11 | January 9th 05 10:21 AM |
| Subwoofer info for beginner | Joan | Home theater (general) | 2 | January 8th 04 06:38 AM |
| Help sought by beginner | John Dunne | UK home cinema | 1 | December 16th 03 12:19 AM |