![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Ian Jackson
writes Despite the bogosity of their claims, I have always found Russ Andrews shops to be very helpful, even advising against expensive products in favour of cheaper ones. Maybe the shop staff have more integrity than their employer. In any high-class establishment selling top-of-the-range products to discerning clientele, I would expect the staff to be more attentive than (say) a Pound Shop. [In earlier times, I would have said Woolworths.] Mmm, if I thought I was in line for a juicy wodge of commission for selling some muppet six grand's worth of kit, then yes, I'd be bloody attentive, I might even persuade them that they would be better off with something costing a little less if I was certain they'd mistake it for honesty and integrity. -- Clint Sharp |
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Kellerman "kellerman writes charles wrote: In article , R. Mark Clayton wrote: I was thinking of getting some new gear, as the current cycle of TV improvements has just about stabilised, so in April I bought a copy of What Hi-Fi Sound & Vision magazine. It might have been April the first as it contained an article about mains leads costing scores if not hundreds of pounds: - http://www.whathifi.com/Reviews/Acce...s-products-Rev iews/Price/ for example "Levels of detail, dynamics and clarity of sound are improved upon tenfold." [by one particular lead at £232]. On three of them you could actually identify the MK plugtop (OK they cost a few pence more), but some Hi_fi buffs must be extremely gullible* to fall for this kind of guff! I've just cancelled my subscription to BBC Music Magazine (after 17 yeas) when it ssid you should spend at least 25% of your hi-fi budget on leads. Oh Yes! There is more twaddle uttered about cables than ANY other hi-fi item. If you think this is bad get the so called reviewers or experts going on speaker cables. Many years ago I did some crude tests on cable and ended up using orange mains cable, the 10A 2-core type used for garden equipment. I could not tell the difference between fancy cables and the orange mains cable. What I could tell was that if I used thin, low current bell wire (rated at about 1A or so) the speakers sounded "odd". With the 10A rated orange cable they sounded OK. I had a big row with an ex-colleague over speaker cable, he was convinced that the silver ptfe insulated stuff at some horrendous price was better than orange mains cable. Wouldn't agree to a blind test though. Dave Was this just because the higher resistance of the wire meant that the speakers weren't as well-damped by the low output impedance of the amplifiers? It was more likely that the extra impedance of the speaker leads had an effect on the crossover in the speakers or the impedance of the leads made up a high pass filter with the output DC blocking capacitor in the not very sophisticated amplifier I had at the time. It was many, many years ago. The system was considered "good" at the time. I'm afraid that I can't remember exactly which amp this was, a Nikkai of some sort I think, when they made decent amps. It was years before I could afford a proper DC coupled amplifier and proper speakers. [1] [2] [3] Now the amp needed decent speaker cable, again the orange garden cable was used. It sounded fine so I didn't bother with any tests. [1] kef Chorale 3's - still got them but I've not used them for a while. [2] The record deck started out as a Garrard SP25 Mk? and then became a Pioneer PL12D. Can't remember exactly which cartridge that had. It was sold via the classified ads years and years and years ago. [3] This was a second hand Cambridge Audio P60, long since since sold to a friend. Dave -- Blow my nose to email me |
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Kellerman kellerman snot wrote: Was this just because the higher resistance of the wire meant that the speakers weren't as well-damped by the low output impedance of the amplifiers? It was more likely that the extra impedance of the speaker leads had an effect on the crossover in the speakers or the impedance of the leads made up a high pass filter with the output DC blocking capacitor in the not very sophisticated amplifier I had at the time. It was many, many years ago. The system was considered "good" at the time. The handbook for the Quad valve amps of the '50s suggested that the loop resistance of speaker cable used shouldn't exceed 5% of the nominal speaker impedance, IIRC. In practice, a 2.5mm² flat twin speaker cable will be fine for most domestic applications without being too large to conceal, fit the terminals or break the budget. -- *Rehab is for quitters Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:23:00 +0100, Kellerman "kellerman snot
wrote: tony sayer wrote: snip Skinflint!.. What you need is a balanced mains tranny, around 2 and a half grand to you guv;!.. Might have to copy 'n paste these.. http://www.russandrews.com/product.a...currency=GBP&p f_id=1190&customer_id=PAA0959052309572THFCSOVZTKUS COFZ Then a couple of power leads the two meter long ones a snip at £6000 yes over Six grand each;!!!! http://www.russandrews.com/product.a...currency=GBP&p f_id=1549&customer_id=PAA0959052309572THFCSOVZTKUS COFZ What the fffffffffffffffffffffu! Who the hell is he trying to kid! Lower noise floor my ar**! The only way that unit would lower any floor is by being so heavy it bends the whole floor down. Has anyone had a little chat with Trading Standards over these claims? To be valid they would need to be properly peer reviewed, published in a reputable magazine and be able to stand up to proper scientific, repeatable experiments. Dave They don't seem to be claims - they are stated as opinions - I don't think trading standards police opinions -- Cheers Peter |
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some are, happily for Russ Andrews and other crooked ******s of his type. Despite the bogosity of their claims, I have always found Russ Andrews shops to be very helpful, even advising against expensive products in favour of cheaper ones. Maybe the shop staff have more integrity than their employer. -- Richard -- Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind. I didn't know he still had any shops. I'm reluctant to admit I had even visited his website :-) However, according to his biography http://www.russandrews.com/article-A...RA_history.htm "Russ had a serious car accident that left him with shoulder and head injuries." [and the very next paragraph reads] "A misunderstanding during a conversation with Michael Lewin (of Grahams Hi-Fi) led to Russ's discovery of cable directionality. His curiosity also led him to discover that improving the contacts on standard mains blocks brought clearly audible improvements in sound quality." Mmm. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 13 May 2009 00:24:15 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: The handbook for the Quad valve amps of the '50s suggested that the loop resistance of speaker cable used shouldn't exceed 5% of the nominal speaker impedance, IIRC. From: Instruction Book, Quad 22 Control Unit and Quad II Power Amplifier: When the loudspeaker leads are reasonably short, thin flex may be used, but if longer runs are employed then the cable should be sufficient thick for its resistance not to exceed 10% of the loudspeaker impedance. I am currently listening to the Eurovision Song Contest using speakers driven by a pair of Quad II amps. |
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter Duncanson wrote:
I am currently listening to the Eurovision Song Contest using speakers driven by a pair of Quad II amps. I do sympathise, but what can I do? Can't you reach the off switch? |
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Peter Duncanson
wrote I am currently listening to the Eurovision Song Contest using speakers driven by a pair of Quad II amps. Don't you then require high resistance cable in order to get a near 100 percent attenuation? -- Alan news2006 {at} amac {dot} f2s {dot} com |
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 16 May 2009 20:49:02 +0100, "Norman Wells"
wrote: Peter Duncanson wrote: I am currently listening to the Eurovision Song Contest using speakers driven by a pair of Quad II amps. I do sympathise, but what can I do? Can't you reach the off switch? Yes, but how can I criticise it properly if I haven't watched it? |
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 16 May 2009 20:54:43 +0100, Alan
wrote: In message , Peter Duncanson wrote I am currently listening to the Eurovision Song Contest using speakers driven by a pair of Quad II amps. Don't you then require high resistance cable in order to get a near 100 percent attenuation? I'm in a different room watching the "mechanics" working on the Hubble Space Telescope. (Soon to finish for the day.) http://www.nasa.gov/55644main_NASATV_Windows.asx |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Samsung gets fancy with Bordeaux PAVV Fabrizio 650 LCD HDTVs | UCLAN[_2_] | High definition TV | 0 | March 6th 09 09:18 PM |
| UK mains voltage | Scott | UK digital tv | 86 | June 22nd 08 09:21 PM |
| HOME CINEMA MAINS CABLES | DAVID BROOK | UK home cinema | 155 | October 24th 05 09:47 PM |
| Another flight of fancy | Sean | High definition TV | 2 | August 28th 04 06:16 PM |
| BlueJean Cables, Signal Cables, Rhino Cables, etc Who is the Best??? | Jason Danziger | Home theater (general) | 1 | August 14th 03 09:41 PM |