![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agamemnon wrote:
e your system isn't all you think it is? It's a shame Luxe don't show anything but hotel promos. Filmed on U-matic from the look of them. How they can claim that is HD I don't know. It's not even SD, and look at the stereo audio bitrate which is only 128 kbps. There are two versions of Luxe, one SD, one HD, both on the same t/p 12643 H HTH -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Agamemnon" wrote in message . uk... The picture quality was totally appalling on SD. Even on the still shots the presenters clothes were totally covered in huge blocks and when the acts were dancing they looked like fuzzy shimmering insects thanks to those dot matrix video walls flashing behind them. This stuff is going at 4505kbps fixed bit rate and it's completely dire. Using H.264 would make no difference to quality at that high a bit rate so why are the BBC still using those flashing video walls behind performers and presenters? Was the HD quality any better and what bit rate is it going out at? The 'dot matrix video walls' cause the same problems on HD broadcasts, even with good bitrates - there's just too much changing detail for the encoders to cope with. I still have a recording of the 2008 Olympics closing party in London, and it is without doubt the worst quality I have ever seen on BBC HD, thanks to those video walls. The real question is which morons put these video walls on the stage, knowing the problems they cause. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mark Carver" wrote in message ... Agamemnon wrote: e your system isn't all you think it is? It's a shame Luxe don't show anything but hotel promos. Filmed on U-matic from the look of them. How they can claim that is HD I don't know. It's not even SD, and look at the stereo audio bitrate which is only 128 kbps. There are two versions of Luxe, one SD, one HD, both on the same t/p I know. The SD version looks like it's been sourced from U-matic so if it's broadcasting the same content as the HD version how can they justify calling it HD? The 128 kbps audio is on the HD stream too. 12643 H HTH -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Graham." wrote in message ... shots of the presenters without their clothes being covered in huge blocks and everything looking fuzzy Damn, I missed it! -- Graham. %Profound_observation% I wish I knew what language these guys were talkin'........its all way too technical for me. I just select SD or HD and get what it sends............BBC HD is so good and I wish I had done it before. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| welcome relief | Bill Wright | UK digital tv | 25 | November 5th 08 02:14 PM |
| Mens Health, Anti-depressants, Pain Relief | [email protected] | High definition TV | 0 | March 28th 08 11:32 PM |
| Toshiba Picture Frame CRT's -best picture quality? | Roger R | UK digital tv | 4 | July 24th 05 07:00 PM |
| Picture Quality | Axl | Tivo personal television | 18 | August 18th 04 04:46 PM |
| DANCE my puppets DANCE | MegaZone | Tivo personal television | 0 | May 7th 04 03:35 AM |