![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:59:30 -0700, JPG wrote:
I bet the bitrate goes up during the commercial breaks, otherwise advertisers would complain. If I am wrong then please correct me, but as far as I know, ITV-4 is statistically multiplexed along with the other N stations on Multiplex 2, so the amount of bandwidth available at any time, including the commercials, will be determined by how much "action" there is in the content of the other stations. Since commercials are not usually fast moving sequences, then they will not actually need as much bandwidth to maintain a level of quality as is necessary for a rapidly changing soccer game. Now the question that people should really be asking is this. Since PSB-2 is going to be changed to DVB-t2/MPEG-4, COM-1 will no doubt change over to DVB-2/MPEG-4 sometime in the future. This will mean that there will be some spare bandwidth available due to the better compression technology. So when the changeover occurs, will Digital 3 and 4 use the spare bandwidth to improve the quality of the picture on existing stations, or sell off the spare capacity to cram in even more low grade picture quality stations? If you were a greedy, profiteering, ruthless multiplex operator, concerned only with bonuses for the directors and higher quarterly dividend cheques for the stockholders, which option would you be choosing? "Let the market decide ..." ????????? |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rob Horton wrote:
Paul D.Smith wrote: This is just "pants". I flicked over to "Battlefield Earth" on ITV4 last night and even on a 28inch set, it was completely unwatchable. The slightest "action" and the screen disintegrated into an array of coloured squares. Can we get some of the people in charge of Freeview and force them to watch this crap for an evening? Paul DS. I thought this post was going to be about a mail performance enhancing pill. The Post Office could certainly need one! |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Paul D.Smith" wrote in message ... that's what you get for watching such crap - you'd have been luckier if you couldn't see it at all. I sort of realised that people would choose to comment on the program rather than the medium. For those who care, I was channel surfing and found myself mesmerized by the sheer poor quality of the media. As I reached this channel, I thought my PVR had gone wrong because it was all yellow/brown boxes but as I watched for a couple of minutes, I realised that it was simply the incredibly poor bitrate and that as soon as anything moved, back they came. You've got to wonder how the BBC can manage six channels per 2D transponder with 720x576 resolution at a reasonable bit-rate, yet ITV use 544x576 resolution and low bit-rates with ****e picture quality, also with six channels per transponder. They've got no excuse for it to be so bad (except, of course, that it's ITV we're talking about) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|