![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#241
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Wright wrote:
Thatcher really should have hung for treason long ago. They should remove that horrible statue of that deformed woman and put one of Maggie in its place. Yes. Thatcher with a noose around her neck. |
|
#242
|
|||
|
|||
|
tony sayer wrote:
, I don't have any particular political inclination. I think that Scargill was mainly responsible for seeing the mining industry into the ground as much if not more so that Thatcher was.. Then you need to do some research. Thatcher was out to 'get' the miners regardless. And coming closer to home the broadcast industry too. Oh! Yes. The BBC with all its hangers on and clipboard holders assistants!.. You defend the BBC, then slag it off. Just read any newsgroup you occupy using google-groups reveals that you are always moaning about how standards have dropped and that too many BBC engineers lost there jobs, but yet you defend the woman who caused it all to happen. Next you slag off immigrants, then defend them. YOUR TWO FACED TONY. J |
|
#243
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scargill made a very good job of losing the fight didn't he?.
But he did fight. -- Boo |
|
#244
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:54:53 -0000, "Bill Wright"
wrote: "PeterT" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:52:55 +0000, Mike wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:00:40 GMT, "Woody" wrote: just get on his mailing list and he'll send you a booklet/catalogue - and keep sending them about quarterly. Best laugh I've had in years, not just on the kit and its prices but also the bold statements that he makes that are just a farce. I often wonder just how many of his mailing list customers do this with no intention ever in a million years of buying one of their overpriced, over hyped items. Buit you HAVE to assume someone must be buying the crap off him - he's still in business!! Maybe he gets a fat subsidy from the EEC. After all as a producer of prime bull**** they must find him impressive. Bill Although no one sounds interested, here's the pic of my bruv and Tony Blair at a Pontins drinking competition in Blackpool. My bruv's that big bloke & Tony is on the right. http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b3...P1/RoyTony.jpg Marky P. |
|
#245
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Marky P" wrote in message ... Although no one sounds interested, here's the pic of my bruv and Tony Blair at a Pontins drinking competition in Blackpool. My bruv's that big bloke & Tony is on the right. http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b3...P1/RoyTony.jpg Marky P. There's only one person on the picture, apart from the bird. Bill |
|
#246
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:44:42 +0000, Marky P
wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:54:53 -0000, "Bill Wright" wrote: "PeterT" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:52:55 +0000, Mike wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:00:40 GMT, "Woody" wrote: just get on his mailing list and he'll send you a booklet/catalogue - and keep sending them about quarterly. Best laugh I've had in years, not just on the kit and its prices but also the bold statements that he makes that are just a farce. I often wonder just how many of his mailing list customers do this with no intention ever in a million years of buying one of their overpriced, over hyped items. Buit you HAVE to assume someone must be buying the crap off him - he's still in business!! Maybe he gets a fat subsidy from the EEC. After all as a producer of prime bull**** they must find him impressive. Bill Although no one sounds interested, here's the pic of my bruv and Tony Blair at a Pontins drinking competition in Blackpool. My bruv's that big bloke & Tony is on the right. http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b3...P1/RoyTony.jpg Marky P. Your bruv not qutre mastered drinking and the best way to get it down the throat then? :-) -- Cheers Peter |
|
#247
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Paul Ratcliffe wrote: Oh FFS, every opposition party leader that comes into power isn't elected at the time they take over as PM. Blair was elected by a party that wasn't running the country at that time. So what? What exactly is your point? You're just making yourself look more stupid than you usually do. Thanks for the insult. I'd go away and think about the actual point before calling others stupid. But I doubt you can remember how. -- *It's this dirty because I washed it with your wife's knickers* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. Absolutely correct. Our UK system of government elects parties, not people. The elected leader of the party then becomes PM. How the leader is chosen is described in the party's standing orders. They differ from party to party. Very simple. On a partisan note, Thather tore great holes through our social fabric ("No such thing as Society" i.e. every person for themselves, often (wrongly) interpreted as "work hard and you'll succeed). In her favour, she took on, and defeated, the Unions that were becoming far too entwined in the running of the country (beer and sandwiches at No 10). Even now, a generation later she evokes strong feelings. |
|
#248
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
mikes wrote: In her favour, she took on, and defeated, the Unions that were becoming far too entwined in the running of the country (beer and sandwiches at No 10). So consulting those directly involved in an industry is a bad thing? Strange. Only the other day that nice Mr Cameron was on about doctors in the NHS not being consulted/in favour of something or other. -- *I don't suffer from insanity -- I'm a carrier Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#249
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , mikes wrote: In her favour, she took on, and defeated, the Unions that were becoming far too entwined in the running of the country (beer and sandwiches at No 10). So consulting those directly involved in an industry is a bad thing? Strange. Only the other day that nice Mr Cameron was on about doctors in the NHS not being consulted/in favour of something or other. -- No problems with consulting. However in the 70s with the Wilson government, they were co-running the country, hence 'beer and sandwiches at No 10" - all wrong. Wilson warning the Unions "get your tanks off my lawn" - to little effect. They were dark times. Thatcher blew all that away. However the 101 things she did wrong (Council tax, Reagan, mass privatisation, social destruction, etc etc.) need to be offset with the thing she did right - take on the Unions. |
|
#250
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , James [email protected]?.?
scribeth thus tony sayer wrote: , I don't have any particular political inclination. I think that Scargill was mainly responsible for seeing the mining industry into the ground as much if not more so that Thatcher was.. Then you need to do some research. Thatcher was out to 'get' the miners regardless. And coming closer to home the broadcast industry too. Oh! Yes. The BBC with all its hangers on and clipboard holders assistants!.. You defend the BBC, then slag it off. Sorry you got that wrong. I do alternately defend the good bits of the BBC i.e. Proms and suchlike, but they do have some very bad bits in that in the 80's they were very overstaffed. I remember once a news crew from the BBC with 10 staff members to cover what ITN took 3 to do!.. They are top heavy with management and their senior executives like Jenny Abramsky on over £300,00 quid a year plus a pension pot the size of the EU wine lake!! whatever and how can they justify salaries like those? Christ! what does she do to warrant that? Where in commercial radio does anyone get paid that money its more then the bloody prime minister gets!. Just a load of piggy's with snouts in the trough... And lets not start of about that fecked up DAB system they promoted and why cannot they have decent bitrates for radio services like what other European broadcasters do?.. Just read any newsgroup you occupy using google-groups reveals that you are always moaning about how standards have dropped and that too many BBC engineers lost there jobs, but yet you defend the woman who caused it all to happen. What Thatcher?.. Now lets see how long has she been out of power now?.. And see above.. Next you slag off immigrants, then defend them. When and where have I done that, and why would I want to anyway being of immigrant stock if Irish is included in that, and being married to an immigrant?.. YOUR TWO FACED TONY. I reckon brother James that you can make any comments fit into your single mindset;(... J -- Tony Sayer |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Home Cinema Terminology | Hollywords, LLC | UK home cinema | 2 | October 17th 07 04:40 AM |
| Correct terminology? | al | UK digital tv | 12 | September 29th 05 03:31 PM |
| Rigger's Diary -- terminology | Bill | UK digital tv | 26 | September 25th 04 12:18 AM |
| TV Terminology Glossaries? | K | UK home cinema | 2 | April 20th 04 01:23 AM |