Clarkson censured for 'bit gay' car gibe

"Agamemnon" wrote in message
...


Oh look whose talking. And homosexual isn't a made up word is it.

At least my words make sense

For a word to be of any use, it has to be understood not just by the writer
but also by the reader. And as your words are understood by no-one (other
than yourself), they're not particularly useful, are they?

"marc_CH" wrote in message
...
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

I wasn't referring to Jesus but Paul. As I said Jesus is not reported as
ever saying anything about same sex matters.

Point conceded. I know very little about Xian beliefs as it strikes as
being all utter and complete baloney, tinged with hypocrisy and coloured
by local events in an irrelevant geographical backwater over two thousand
years ago.

My understanding of it is that around 2000 years ago there was a Jewish
rabbi called Jesus who went around suggesting that people should be nice to
each other. He gave a few sermons and gained a few followers. Some of the
followers hoped he'd be the Messiah they'd been looking for (the Jews of the
time were on a constant lookout for the much-prophesised Messiah). Only
problem was that Jesus was a bit of a rebel, got on the wrong side of the
Romans and ended up getting nailed to a cross.

The original followers of Jesus carried on his work, followed some of his
teachings and wrote many of them down. Some of the more obsessive followers
(Paul in particular) started off a whole new religion with Jesus at its
centre. He was hoping Jesus would come back during his lifetime.

Today's Christians have a Bible that is a mixture of the teachings of Jesus
(which are probably mixed in with the teachings of a few other Rabbis as
well) and a partially factual, partially exaggerated and partially fictional
account of his life (written as it was with hindsight, and intended to show
that Jesus fulfilled the prophesies of the Old Testatment).

All in my opinion, of course.

"Stephen Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Agamemnon" wrote in message
. uk...

"marc_CH" wrote in message
...
Greek Freak Agamemnon wrote:

You don't know what you are talking about.

This is usually what you say prior to one of your inimitable brainfarts.
I sit, rapt with attention.

Jehovah was a real historical person. He was a Phoenician king who they
elevated to a God in about 1650 BC.

[huge snippage]

How in the name of *the shiny blue ***** can one be a 'real historical
person' one minute and a 'god' the next?


Get an education you stupid lesbian. A God is a deified ancestor.
Alexander the Grear, Julius Caesar and Augustus are all Gods and
kings/emperors. Jehovah is a God and a Pharaoh of Lower Egypt and
Palestine who ruled in about 1650 BC as part of the Hyksos Dynasty.

Ah. This will be the Aggy dictionary. The one that contains words that
don't exist, and redefines words that do exist.

So now you are having paranoid delusions that words do not exist.

The words have been published therefore the words exist. If you think they
are not there then you need to see a therapist.


Such as God. In Aggy's world, a God is a deified ancestor. Back in the
real world, most people think of God (note - singular) as the supreme
being - the creator and ruler of the universe.

You definitely are paranoid and insane if you believe that.

Sir Isaac Newton

"They [the Greeks] Deified their dead in divers manners, according to their
abilities and circumstances, and the merits of the person; some only in
private families, as houshold Gods or Dii Pænates; others by erecting
gravestones to them in publick, to be used as altars for annual sacrifices;
others, by building also to them sepulchres in the form of houses or
temples; and some by appointing mysteries, and ceremonies, and set
sacrifices, and festivals, and initiations, and a succession of priests for
performing those institutions in the temples, and handing them down to
posterity."

http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.u...ode=normalized

Beeblebear wrote:
"ThePunisher" wrote in message
...
Stephen Wilson wrote:

Hardcore aetheists can be just as irrational as hardcore Christians.

How many people have be persecuted or killed by hardcore aetheists?


Stalin
Mao
Pol Pot

I wonder what C word these three have in common? which is basically a
religon.

Does adding up their combined death tolls give you a reasonable start?

To quote my wife
Blaming religion for the crusades is like blaming marriage for
domestic violence.


And yet no religion equals no crusades, strange that.

BTW fix your sig seperator.

--
ThePunisher

"Stephen Wilson" wrote in message
news

"Agamemnon" wrote in message
...


Oh look whose talking. And homosexual isn't a made up word is it.

At least my words make sense

For a word to be of any use, it has to be understood not just by the
writer but also by the reader. And as your words are understood by no-one
(other than yourself), they're not particularly useful, are they?

They are understood by anyone who has had a classical education or can
comprehend the contexts of sentences, whereas the term homosexual is not
since it is a nonsense word. Its components are not even constructed from
the same language.

Agamemnon wrote:
"marc_CH" wrote in message
...
Agamemnon wrote:

Yes, I'm glad that you brought up the notion of 'evidence' because
you appear to have none *whatsoever* for what you are saying here.
Who says there are any gods -at all-?

I've already proven the existence of Jehovah, Zeus, Saturn and
Sarapis. That's proof enough that the Gods are real.

You have 'proven' no such thing. You prove something by redefining
it.

I can't redefine something by going back to its original definition
you stupid lesbian.

You are the one trying to deny something by redefining it. Even Sir
Isaac Newton accepted the Gods were defied ancestors. Read his
Natural History.

Of course Newton was correct in everthing he wrote, wasn't he.

--
ThePunisher

"zarbiface" wrote in message
ups.com...
On 26 May, 20:59, "Agamemnon" wrote:
"marc_CH" wrote in message

...

Agamemnon wrote:

It's not a redefinition you lesbian.

I still ask you to come up with the reasons why you think I am a
lesbian.
You seem singularly silent on the subject.

Look at your name Marc or should I say Marcella.



--
marc

Lesbian.

So if a woman has what you consider a man's name she's a lesbian? So
you're saying Billie Piper is a lesbian now?

Well it might explain why she left her husband.

You're totally nuts.

You are the lesbian. You are the one whose nuts. Maybe you should go minge
munching with Marcella. Post us some pictures.

"The Doctor" wrote in message
...
In article ,
ThePunisher wrote:
Stephen Wilson wrote:

Hardcore aetheists can be just as irrational as hardcore Christians.

How many people have be persecuted or killed by hardcore aetheists?


Many under Nazi and Communist Rule.

You do realise that the great leader of the Nazis was Christian, don't you?

Agamemnon wrote:
"Stephen Wilson" wrote in message
news

"Agamemnon" wrote in message
...


Oh look whose talking. And homosexual isn't a made up word is it.

At least my words make sense

For a word to be of any use, it has to be understood not just by the
writer but also by the reader. And as your words are understood by
no-one (other than yourself), they're not particularly useful, are
they?

They are understood by anyone who has had a classical education or can
comprehend the contexts of sentences, whereas the term homosexual is
not since it is a nonsense word. Its components are not even
constructed from the same language.

Google search,

Results 1 - 50 of about 15,100,000 for homosexual

Results 1 - 3 of 3 for kolofilia

Results 1 - 26 of 26 for idiogenogamosis

Yes, you can easily see which words are nonsense.

--
ThePunisher

"Agamemnon" wrote in message
...


Now seek help, please.

You are the on who needs help. All idiogenogamotics need help.

Yep, despite the fact that you're the only person in the world who knows
this. You're the only one who can see how depraved the world is and everyone
else is deluded.

There's a term for people like you. Psychotic.