Wait until Sky sees this ...

"Edster" wrote in message
...
"Tumbleweed" wrote in message

Oner thing they have considered is a different ad that only comes up when
you fast forward.

Telling you that you're missing the only bit of entertainment you're
ever likely to get that doesn't have on screen logos and other
assorted crap?

Yep, it will probably say 'our monitoring of your viewing suggests that you
have missed this fine selection of DOGs and obtrusive spinning adverts for
future programs."
:-)

--
Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

"Zero Tolerance" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:14:06 +0100, "Heracles Pollux"
wrote:

I'd personally invest in a Mercedes-Benz of the TV broadcast business if
one
ever emerges here. It won't happen due to the problem of the ****-bags who
control the channels, are also the ****-bags who control the supply of
content.

Or alternatively because there's just no significant market for it?

--



The US channels such as HBO and Universal HD seem to make excellent content
and profit and broadcast without DOGs.

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:55:16 +0100, "Heracles Pollux"
wrote:

The US channels such as HBO and Universal HD seem to make excellent content
and profit and broadcast without DOGs.

As does Sky Movies. What's your point?

--

"Zero Tolerance" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:55:16 +0100, "Heracles Pollux"
wrote:

The US channels such as HBO and Universal HD seem to make excellent
content
and profit and broadcast without DOGs.

As does Sky Movies. What's your point?

--


What do you think?