![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
:::Jerry:::: wrote:
As I recall the original discussion, it related to Freeview. I think you'll find the number of channels there is somewhat more limited. Even so, there are more then 5 and I could have my 3 Parliament channels quite easily by just making the 'couch potatoes' use proper shops... I'd be quite happy to see the back of all the shopping channels, quiz channels and the like. But I can think of better uses for the bandwidth thus liberated! (not least of which would be higher video quality for the remaining channels). Parliamentary coverage should be streamed live on the Internet for those who want it, and also archived in an easily retrievable fashion as a sort of online video Hansard. That would be much more useful. |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pyriform" wrote in message ... :::Jerry:::: wrote: As I recall the original discussion, it related to Freeview. I think you'll find the number of channels there is somewhat more limited. Even so, there are more then 5 and I could have my 3 Parliament channels quite easily by just making the 'couch potatoes' use proper shops... I'd be quite happy to see the back of all the shopping channels, quiz channels and the like. But I can think of better uses for the bandwidth thus liberated! (not least of which would be higher video quality for the remaining channels). We could have both if that many channels were scrapped! Parliamentary coverage should be streamed live on the Internet for those who want it, and also archived in an easily retrievable fashion as a sort of online video Hansard. That would be much more useful. You are forgetting that many people still don't have a fast (or stable) enough internet connection, assuming that they have a connection / computer at all. But as you have such a connection why can't your comedy (or what ever) not be streamed, after all it hardly responsible for what happens in the country / world... |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
:::Jerry:::: wrote:
You are forgetting that many people still don't have a fast (or stable) enough internet connection, assuming that they have a connection / computer at all. Well then, they must go without! It's new technology either way, and a broadcast medium is better suited to material destined for a mass audience. Your idea that we would all be glued to the cut and thrust of parliamentary debate if only it were all available on full frame TV channels is pure self-delusion. But as you have such a connection why can't your comedy (or what ever) not be streamed, after all it hardly responsible for what happens in the country / world... Neither, I would submit, is parliament (most of the time). But I'm all for proper video-on-demand TV, delivered over broadband. Especially if it gets me HD. Bring it on. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anger at BBC demand to hike television licence fee to £180 | Agamemnon | UK digital tv | 37 | October 17th 05 11:11 AM |
| How does teh HDTV work over satellite | Sony Antony | High definition TV | 24 | February 13th 04 10:51 PM |
| Picture Resolution Explained? | Scot Gardner | Home theater (general) | 8 | January 16th 04 03:20 AM |
| Resolution | Thomas A. Fine | High definition TV | 114 | December 12th 03 06:56 PM |
| Sooo Confused | Sisyphus | High definition TV | 10 | November 24th 03 08:26 PM |