Freeview EPG

Why on earth are they mucking around with the Freeview EPG? The thing
works, so why move things? I think they got some overpaid person sitting
down on their behind wondering what idea they should come up with so it
looks like he is doing something for is money.

There is nothing wrong with the EPG as it is, is this what we have to
put up in the digital world, for ever re-scanning?

"Ad C" wrote in message
k...

Why on earth are they mucking around with the Freeview EPG? The thing
works, so why move things? I think they got some overpaid person sitting
down on their behind wondering what idea they should come up with so it
looks like he is doing something for is money.

There is nothing wrong with the EPG as it is, is this what we have to
put up in the digital world, for ever re-scanning?

I totally agree. I shall just arrange them back as I have them now
anyway.... BLX to the changes.

In article ,
says...

There is nothing wrong with the EPG as it is, is this what we have to
put up in the digital world, for ever re-scanning?

I totally agree. I shall just arrange them back as I have them now
anyway.... BLX to the changes.


It is bloody stupid, people don't want to rescan all the time.

Yeah, agreed, mine's not changed either.

--
John the West Ham fan


"steve" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 08:24:36 +0100, Ad C wrote:

people don't want to rescan all the time.

I am sure people don't, I guess that is why the don't change the EPG all
the time.

In article , housetrained
wrote:

Yeah, agreed, mine's not changed either.

It won't until (allegedly) the 18th.

Ad C wrote:
Why on earth are they mucking around with the Freeview EPG? [...]

Group by theme, leaving space for new launches (seems a clear
error in the current layout) with a more sensible start location
for radio and maybe preparing for the BBC/ITV Freesat channel
layout? Might even "persuade" Sky to get BBC 3/4 and ITV 2/3
down from 115-119, behind UK Gold and Living.

Ad C ] said

Why on earth are they mucking around with the Freeview EPG? The thing
works, so why move things? I think they got some overpaid person sitting
down on their behind wondering what idea they should come up with so it
looks like he is doing something for is money.

There is nothing wrong with the EPG as it is, is this what we have to
put up in the digital world, for ever re-scanning?



Well I think it is a good idea and, given that it isn't something that
is going to happen frequently, I think you are just being a bit of a
moaning minny.

Ad C wrote:
Why on earth are they mucking around with the Freeview EPG? The thing
works, so why move things? I think they got some overpaid person sitting
down on their behind wondering what idea they should come up with so it
looks like he is doing something for is money.

There is nothing wrong with the EPG as it is, is this what we have to
put up in the digital world, for ever re-scanning?

I'd just wish they'd move the Tits-Up TV channels to an area of their
own, out of the way of everything else. My current system doesn't ignore
encrypted channels, and it's a pain having to jump through a group of
channels that can't be received.

In article ,
lid says...


I am sure people don't, I guess that is why the don't change the EPG all
the time.


Everytime they add a channel, it needs to be rescanned.

I was talking to someone at work last week and they did not even realise
that E4 was on Freeview.

In article s.net,
says...
Ad C wrote:
Why on earth are they mucking around with the Freeview EPG? [...]

Group by theme, leaving space for new launches (seems a clear


How on earth can they launch anym more on this platform?

error in the current layout) with a more sensible start location
for radio and maybe preparing for the BBC/ITV Freesat channel
layout? Might even "persuade" Sky to get BBC 3/4 and ITV 2/3
down from 115-119, behind UK Gold and Living.


I think they do it because they can and to annoye people.