![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[X-post to uk.radio.amateur where it may be more on topic]
Hi, still wildly off down the radio aerial route. My neighbour was talking about improving his signal because he got a lot of background hiss and bubble/crackle stuff on his FM. Picked up a dipole for him, then went up into the loft to see what he had at the moment. It wasn't a Yagi it was a venerable YAGI! Four elements before the one where the co-ax connects, and a big vertical three element spread behind on the reflector. Very old aerial (more green than silver) but if Yagis are high gain then this must be capable of picking up a strong signal if it is working correctly. Laid across loft support beams (chest high and running about half the length of the loft) and the elements are horizontal. It is pointing more or less due west, where the signal should be coming from. The signal strength reading on his Hi-Fi tuner was showing 50-55dB. So: (1) Is this reading a reasonable one for a Yagi? What dB constitutes a good strong signal? (2) Could the aerial be too powerful - picking up all sorts of unwanted noise as well? (3) Could the age and high state of corrosion mean that it is largely ineffective - perhaps needing stripping down and cleaning up to ensure electrical continuity throughout the aerial? I felt a bit like a Kia salesman suddenly realising he had been asked to replace a Rolls Royce :-) Cheers Dave R -- |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"David W.E. Roberts" wrote in message
... The signal strength reading on his Hi-Fi tuner was showing 50-55dB. Pretty meaningless, unless you know what the meter is calibrated against. Assuming it is calibrated. Many a quality communications receiver lacks a good S meter, so don't rely on a HiFi one! So: (1) Is this reading a reasonable one for a Yagi? What dB constitutes a good strong signal? See above. (2) Could the aerial be too powerful - picking up all sorts of unwanted noise as well? No. (3) Could the age and high state of corrosion mean that it is largely ineffective - perhaps needing stripping down and cleaning up to ensure electrical continuity throughout the aerial? Possibly (even probably) the cause. Got to be worth a try. Don't worry about the elements- just make sure the connections and cable are good. Has the cable been damaged? Has it got water in it (I've seen water run out of coax in the past!). If you are in a strong signal area then indoors is OK for an antenna but outdoors in more likely to succeed. I felt a bit like a Kia salesman suddenly realising he had been asked to replace a Rolls Royce :-) Rolls Royces are OK, but I wouldn't want another one. -- Brian Reay www.g8osn.org.uk www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk FP#898 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... "David W.E. Roberts" wrote in message ... Rolls Royces are OK, but I wouldn't want another one. My sisters has been keyed about five times, so these days it stays in her garage almost permanently. Regards tox |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sounds like a cable fault.
Put an ohm meter across the terminals at the bottom of the cable. It should read about 2ohm, assuming that the aerial has a conventional folded dipole. Disconnect the aerial and recheck. Reading should now be infinity. Simple logic will now tell you whether or not to replace the cable. Bill |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:28:15 -0000, "David W.E. Roberts"
wrote: [X-post to uk.radio.amateur where it may be more on topic] Hi, still wildly off down the radio aerial route. My neighbour was talking about improving his signal because he got a lot of background hiss and bubble/crackle stuff on his FM. Picked up a dipole for him, then went up into the loft to see what he had at the moment. It wasn't a Yagi it was a venerable YAGI! Four elements before the one where the co-ax connects, and a big vertical three element spread behind on the reflector. Very old aerial (more green than silver) but if Yagis are high gain then this must be capable of picking up a strong signal if it is working correctly. Laid across loft support beams (chest high and running about half the length of the loft) and the elements are horizontal. It is pointing more or less due west, where the signal should be coming from. The signal strength reading on his Hi-Fi tuner was showing 50-55dB. So: (1) Is this reading a reasonable one for a Yagi? What dB constitutes a good strong signal? (2) Could the aerial be too powerful - picking up all sorts of unwanted noise as well? (3) Could the age and high state of corrosion mean that it is largely ineffective - perhaps needing stripping down and cleaning up to ensure electrical continuity throughout the aerial? I felt a bit like a Kia salesman suddenly realising he had been asked to replace a Rolls Royce :-) Cheers Dave R Old FM aerials are best replaced, mainly for the reason that most of them have poor performance much above 102Mhz. A new dipole will give more signal strength at higher frequencies than the biggest ancient FM aerial. Old FM aerial = most aerials before 1990. Marky P. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:28:15 -0000, "David W.E. Roberts" wrote:
The signal strength reading on his Hi-Fi tuner was showing 50-55dB. Much more than adequate. My TV is 65dB which I call VERY good. So: (1) Is this reading a reasonable one for a Yagi? What dB constitutes a good strong signal? 65dB ! (2) Could the aerial be too powerful - picking up all sorts of unwanted noise as well? No. (3) Could the age and high state of corrosion mean that it is largely ineffective - perhaps needing stripping down and cleaning up to ensure electrical continuity throughout the aerial? More than likely. Check the coax also for breaks, shorts, corrosion, damp (unlikely with a loft installation), check connectors at the tuner end as well; Belling-Lee plugs should be soldered onto the inner conductor, not just as a push fit. Jock. -- "The graveyards are full of indispensable men." - Charles de Gaulle (1890-1970) |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:39:06 -0000, "Brian Reay"
wrote: Rolls Royces are OK, but I wouldn't want another one. Typical Brian. Poser! (Shouldn't that be another two?) Jock. -- "The graveyards are full of indispensable men." - Charles de Gaulle (1890-1970) |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
The signal strength reading on his Hi-Fi tuner was showing 50-55dB.
Much more than adequate. My TV is 65dB which I call VERY good. So: (1) Is this reading a reasonable one for a Yagi? What dB constitutes a good strong signal? 65dB ! dB is a ratio, not an amount. dB referred to what? 65dBuV is a reasonable TV signal. 65dBmV is enough to feed a very large number of flats. As a matter of interest, some FM tuners claim that they will work OK on 10dBuV. The realistic lower level is probably more like 25dBuV if you want to actually listen to the programme. A reasonable signal would be about 55dbuV. 70dBuV is really solid, with good immunity to interference. Bill |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
The L.I.A.R. and his downright lying, perhaps?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Rolls Royces are OK, but I wouldn't want another one. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
snip
Rolls Royces are OK, but I wouldn't want another one. Brian, I cant fault you on your radio knowledge but try and tone down the posing om ![]() deBaser |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Signal Strength from Hannington | John Beeston | UK digital tv | 1 | October 25th 04 07:36 PM |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Simon | UK digital tv | 0 | March 28th 04 05:35 PM |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Simon | UK digital tv | 0 | March 28th 04 05:35 PM |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Bill | UK digital tv | 0 | March 28th 04 01:37 PM |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Bill | UK digital tv | 0 | March 28th 04 01:37 PM |