![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My box is a Thomson DHD4000, and at the moment it is picking up
Moel-y-Parc transmitter in addition to my "proper" transmitted (Winter Hill). Most of this gives me no problems, apart from channel 58, which carries Ch4 etc. I believe that the THomson box enters channels into the lineup on the basis of which mux it identifies first (numerically), regardless of signal strength. Unfortunately, channel 58 offers mostly unwatchable transmissions, and this means that when I re-scan for new channels I often get left with no Ch4. If the weather helps me out, I can scan at a time which is less favourable for receiving Moel-y-Parc, and this usually works, however I haven't been able to do this for a while now. Is there a cheap inline filter than I can apply to prevent the box from seeing channel 58? Or botch job that would do the job equally as well? The channels that I "need" from Winter Hill overlap the M-y-P range, so a new aerial wouldn't be the solution. I think I might just try to use cheaper and cheaper co-ax until the signal deteriorates sufficiently - would that be an option? Also, and this is odd, in the technical menu of the box it shows the name of the transmitter which is being received. Obviously, this is usually Winter Hill, however for this channel 58 it shows as Wenvoe. Having looked on the dtg website, Wenvoe doesn't transmit on channel 58, and Moel-y-Parc does. How does the name of the transmitter get carried, and does this mean everyone receiving M-y-P thinks they are getting signals from Wenvoe? Cheers! Matt |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Larkin wrote:
Is there a cheap inline filter than I can apply to prevent the box from seeing channel 58? Or botch job that would do the job equally as well? The channels that I "need" from Winter Hill overlap the M-y-P range, so a new aerial wouldn't be the solution. You could consider using a VCR or another STB, and put that between your aerial and Thomson box. Then set the RF output of that box to UHF Ch58, and hopefully it should mangle up the unwanted mux sufficiently to make the Thomson ignore it. Also, and this is odd, in the technical menu of the box it shows the name of the transmitter which is being received. Obviously, this is usually Winter Hill, however for this channel 58 it shows as Wenvoe. Having looked on the dtg website, Wenvoe doesn't transmit on channel 58, and Moel-y-Parc does. How does the name of the transmitter get carried, and does this mean everyone receiving M-y-P thinks they are getting signals from Wenvoe? Wenvoe and all the Welsh transmitters carry the same region (no sub regions in Wales AFAIK). Therefore there will only be central mux point for Wales, and this will most likely be in or near Cardiff. Perhaps at Wenvoe itself. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Larkin wrote:
My box is a Thomson DHD4000, and at the moment it is picking up Moel-y-Parc transmitter in addition to my "proper" transmitted (Winter Hill). Most of this gives me no problems, apart from channel 58, which carries Ch4 etc. I believe that the THomson box enters channels into the lineup on the basis of which mux it identifies first (numerically), regardless of signal strength. Unfortunately, channel 58 offers mostly unwatchable transmissions, and this means that when I re-scan for new channels I often get left with no Ch4. If the weather helps me out, I can scan at a time which is less favourable for receiving Moel-y-Parc, and this usually works, however I haven't been able to do this for a while now. Is there a cheap inline filter than I can apply to prevent the box from seeing channel 58? Or botch job that would do the job equally as well? The channels that I "need" from Winter Hill overlap the M-y-P range, so a new aerial wouldn't be the solution. I think I might just try to use cheaper and cheaper co-ax until the signal deteriorates sufficiently - would that be an option? Also, and this is odd, in the technical menu of the box it shows the name of the transmitter which is being received. Obviously, this is usually Winter Hill, however for this channel 58 it shows as Wenvoe. Having looked on the dtg website, Wenvoe doesn't transmit on channel 58, and Moel-y-Parc does. How does the name of the transmitter get carried, and does this mean everyone receiving M-y-P thinks they are getting signals from Wenvoe? Cheers! Matt I beleive Maplin sell some RF attenuators that could be used to reduce the signal strength, although this will effect all muxes. I have a similar problem with a Pioneer DBR-TF100 which gets signals from Winter Hill and Moel-y-Parc, and screws up BBCi. Richard. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Larkin wrote:
My box is a Thomson DHD4000, and at the moment it is picking up Moel-y-Parc transmitter in addition to my "proper" transmitted (Winter Hill). Most of this gives me no problems, apart from channel 58, which carries Ch4 etc. I believe that the THomson box enters channels into the lineup on the basis of which mux it identifies first (numerically), regardless of signal strength. Does this box place received channel duplicates at 800 upwards? Maybe you could rearrange by renumbering. If not, bad luck. Making interference on that channel from a video recorder while tuning looks like your solution. You could buy inline 'notch filters' for specific channels but I've read they are expensive. Besides, you'd only need it for the period that you are retuning. I'd contact Thomson and get them to understand this deficiency in their software. Other manufacturers have implemented workarounds for this. -- Adrian C |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
That was going to be my suggestion too, but it sounds like the attenuator
would only need to be in for channel learning and then could be removed for full signal in normal use, or have I misunderstood the OP. No you've got it right. It can be awkward to find the correct attenuation value, so use a variable. Bill |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| high pass filter and telewest broadband help needed | chris | UK digital tv | 0 | July 15th 04 12:43 AM |
| comb filter? | David Bendor | Home theater (general) | 3 | February 12th 04 08:47 PM |
| Comb Filter question, HELP! | Steve Grauman | High definition TV | 10 | December 16th 03 01:47 AM |
| Fujitsu 42 inch Plasma (P42HHA10) | Ted Martin | High definition TV | 12 | November 26th 03 02:04 PM |