![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/08/2019 18:12, Brian Gaff wrote:
That is what I heard, so maybe Sky will need to be renamed fibre You mean the way carphone warehouse changed their name? Andy |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can do as many things as I need to at the same time, e.g. checking
some detail on IMDB on a laptop or Whatsapp messages on a phone while watching a programme via a streaming service on the TV. Occasionally I've done these things while forgetting that I'm downloading something really big like a Linux distribution despite it showing on the task manager as using the entire download bandwidth. Presumably streaming video is given a higher priority because I've never noticed any interruption when I do something else such as described above at the same time. Everything just works. If anybody tried to convince me that I needed to pay for some new superduper fibre service because 27Mb/s wasn't enough, I'd be interested to hear their argument but it's unlikely I'd be persuaded. Technical measurements can be useful, but in deciding whether some system or piece of equipment is suitable for my purposes, "engineering by numbers" is not a complete answer. In the end it boils down to what the equipment can actually do in practice. Rod. On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:13:44 +0100, "Brian Gaff" wrote: Hmm, I do feel you might struggle if you do a few at the same time. Brian -- ----- -- This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please Note this Signature is meaningless.! "Roderick Stewart" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 00:36:56 -0000 (UTC), Moomin wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2019 21:06:45 +0000, Jeff Gaines wrote: I had Sky Q put in a few weeks ago. I spoke to an engineer about feeding it from the Internet rather than a dish and he saidthat would only work when we all had Gigabit Internet. On 04/08/2019 in message Brian Gaff wrote: I as as it seems to me that as the internet gets more and more integrated into life, that deliving content on a sat. which will wear out and cannot be serviced on orbit is a bit redundant. Brian My wife's 'Sky Q box' works from an internet hub. No dish. Likewise my Amazon box, and the PC I used as a media centre for several years before it. I can have movies from Amazon or Netflix, catchup services from BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5 and the "Dave" group, and I haven't even counted how many live TV and radio channels from all round the world, in 1920x1080 high resolution where applicable, and all of it comes down the phone line. I certainly don't need a satellite dish, and now probably wouldn't even bother with a Freeview setup if I didn't have one already, and since all of this is possible at a mere 27Mb/s, and has been since I had 10Mb/s ADSL, I don't need to wait for gigabit FTTP either. Rod. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roderick Stewart" wrote in message
... I can do as many things as I need to at the same time, e.g. checking some detail on IMDB on a laptop or Whatsapp messages on a phone while watching a programme via a streaming service on the TV. Occasionally I've done these things while forgetting that I'm downloading something really big like a Linux distribution despite it showing on the task manager as using the entire download bandwidth. Presumably streaming video is given a higher priority because I've never noticed any interruption when I do something else such as described above at the same time. Everything just works. If anybody tried to convince me that I needed to pay for some new superduper fibre service because 27Mb/s wasn't enough, I'd be interested to hear their argument but it's unlikely I'd be persuaded. Technical measurements can be useful, but in deciding whether some system or piece of equipment is suitable for my purposes, "engineering by numbers" is not a complete answer. In the end it boils down to what the equipment can actually do in practice. Yes, there comes a point with internet speeds where anything beyond that point has very little noticeable effect. For web browsing and sending/receiving emails without attachments, that limit is pretty low, though the 1800/300 kbps connection we had at our temporary house (during house sale/purchase) really was painful. For streaming video or transferring large emails, the limit is higher - maybe 10 Mbps in each direction. Anything beyond that will reduce the time for large file transfers, but that tends to be a background task so it's not always one which you are waiting to complete before you can get on with something else. The main benefit of fibre and other fast internet for me is the fact that the *upload* speed is considerably faster. With ADSL we got 7000 down and 0.4 Mbps up, which was fine for receiving but very slow when sending large emails or uploading via FTP or TeamViewer. Our FTTC connection is about 30/15 Mbps which is considerably faster for upload (and noticeably faster for download). The problem with internet nowadays is that the traditional asymmetric speed model (download much faster that upload) is no longer valid, now that people want to backup to cloud storage. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Y/Pb/Pr always progressive component? | Brad Griffis | High definition TV | 0 | September 9th 04 04:49 AM |
Panasonic IDTV doesn't always record to Panasonic video | Andrew V. | UK digital tv | 2 | December 21st 03 12:27 PM |
Ultimate TV Tuner going, going... | Steve | Satellite dbs | 14 | October 6th 03 07:39 PM |
Are channel lineup changes always this frustrating with Tivo? | Will Mulloy | Tivo personal television | 3 | September 12th 03 05:54 AM |