![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was comparing various HDTV's and so far prefere DLP's but I noticed
that Standard video signals look a bit fuzzy on HDTV's are they working on improving this or do we just wait for all TV channels to be offered in HD or Digital Edward |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:41:57 -0500, Edward wrote:
I was comparing various HDTV's and so far prefere DLP's but I noticed that Standard video signals look a bit fuzzy on HDTV's are they working on improving this or do we just wait for all TV channels to be offered in HD or Digital What is your source coming from [DBS/Cable/OTA] ? DBS, some Cable, et.al., have been degrading signal quality...only C-Band still has quality... Voom should have some quality too... www.voom.com Soution - Get a smaller HDTV for Standard video [analog/SD]; otherwise complain to www.fcc.gov who most likely won't do a thing, unless it is OTA TV. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
You probably like DLP because it provides the best contrast and color
saturation of the bunch, save RP Gun based TV's. Standard cable/OTA/Satellite is going to look low-resolution (one faction of which is fuzziness) no matter what set you buy. Adjusting the set will help this situation a bit, but even on things like Cable the quality of the signal will vary from channel to channel and there is very little the cable company can do about it. Its part of the reason HDTV needs to catch on quicker.....nobody is going to buy a giant TV if the only thing they are going to watch on it is fuzzy, low rez SDTV images.. "Edward" wrote in message ... I was comparing various HDTV's and so far prefere DLP's but I noticed that Standard video signals look a bit fuzzy on HDTV's are they working on improving this or do we just wait for all TV channels to be offered in HD or Digital Edward |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:41:57 -0500, Edward wrote:
I was comparing various HDTV's and so far prefere DLP's but I noticed that Standard video signals look a bit fuzzy on HDTV's are they working on improving this or do we just wait for all TV channels to be offered in HD or Digital Edward I will be on Cable with a Scientific Atlanta Explorer® 3100HD Digital cable box Currently have the non HD version will upgrade after / IF I get a HDTV I mostly watch DVD's but room mate watches alot of TV so I am now concerned about the standard brodcast quality. $4000 is alot to spend for a less than crisp picture. So I might just wait another year or two and just spend my money this year on the Hometheater audio (reciever and speakers). I was really all excited about having this all done this year LOL. Time to slow down the adrienlin. Edward |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 16:16:37 -0500, Edward wrote:
I mostly watch DVD's but room mate watches alot of TV so I am now concerned about the standard brodcast quality. I would not waste bucks on HDTV unless it has these newer standards: "Louisville, Colorado, December 17, 2003 - The cable industry is building upon its digital video accomplishments with the announcement by CableLabs that it has awarded certified status to Samsung Electronics for an integrated digital television set (DTV) that connects directly to cable television systems and receives digital services without requiring a set-top box" http://www.cablelabs.com/news/pr/200...rt_121703.html Having DVI/HDCP Connector - "DVI/HDCP delivers video in an uncompressed format and therefore supports real-time complex graphics displays and user interfaces found in program guides and other interactive features for high-definition digital television" http://www.cablelabs.com/news/newsle...gs/story4.html |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is the same problem I posted about earlier. I wound up working out an
exchange for my 65" Mitsubishi Diamond so I could go with a Phillips DLP. The contrast was not as good as the Mits, it was a lot sharper. The trade should be on Saturday. I will let you know how it works out. "Edward" wrote in message ... I was comparing various HDTV's and so far prefere DLP's but I noticed that Standard video signals look a bit fuzzy on HDTV's are they working on improving this or do we just wait for all TV channels to be offered in HD or Digital Edward |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am sure glad I did not go to an "Audio" expert such as you for advice when I bought
my HT equipment three years ago............. I have been enjoying high quality pictures on my Pioneer Elite 16:9 HDTV all of that time........................ ================================= "Uptown Audio" wrote in message news:[email protected] : The money is better spent on good speakers anyway as a nice analog set : is hard to beat for picture quality. In about five years, it will make : sense to get a 16:9 HDTV monitor and at that time it will not cost : quite as much, so there are a couple of benefits here. One being that : by watching the analog TV now, you are getting the best video quality : if perhaps a bit smaller. Two being that when you do make the swap, : most all of the channels will be digital and the cost will be more : reasonable, so you actually get what you pay for. There is no need to : rush it. If you can't wait to get a larger screen and really enjoy : widescreen DVDs, then you can adjust the sets resolution (sharpness : control) to make the pixels bleed and look more film-like. With them : set at the highest definition setting, they only look nice with : digital images and analog sources are grainy. : - Bill : www.uptownaudio.com : Roanoke VA : (540) 343-1250 : : "Edward" wrote in message : ... : On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:41:57 -0500, Edward : wrote: : : I was comparing various HDTV's and so far prefere DLP's but I : noticed : that Standard video signals look a bit fuzzy on HDTV's are they : working on improving this or do we just wait for all TV channels to : be : offered in HD or Digital : : Edward : : I will be on Cable with a Scientific Atlanta Explorer® 3100HD : Digital : cable box Currently have the non HD version will upgrade after / IF : I : get a HDTV I mostly watch DVD's but room mate watches alot of TV so : I : am now concerned about the standard brodcast quality. $4000 is alot : to : spend for a less than crisp picture. So I might just wait another : year : or two and just spend my money this year on the Hometheater audio : (reciever and speakers). I was really all excited about having this : all done this year LOL. Time to slow down the adrienlin. : : Edward : : |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:25:17 -0800, "Richard C."
wrote: I have been enjoying high quality pictures on my Pioneer Elite 16:9 HDTV all of that time........................ What is your source feed; if you say DBS, I'm going to laugh... |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message
s.com... : On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:25:17 -0800, "Richard C." : wrote: : : I have been enjoying high quality pictures on my Pioneer Elite 16:9 HDTV all of that : time........................ : : What is your source feed; if you say DBS, I'm going to laugh... : =============================== OTA locals and HDNet...................... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Newbie Help | JJ Walker | Home theater (general) | 8 | January 1st 04 09:03 PM |
| Video Processors | Internet Shopper | Home theater (general) | 1 | November 8th 03 03:02 AM |
| HDTV: Decisions, decisions... | Darren Harris | Home theater (general) | 30 | October 31st 03 11:04 PM |
| Thinking HDTV? May Want to Wait | Ann Meffert | Home theater (general) | 10 | August 3rd 03 10:53 PM |
| You're missing a WHOLE lot if you don't connect your classic videogame systems to an Analog RGB monitor. | Great Hierophant | Home theater (general) | 18 | July 3rd 03 12:39 PM |