![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave W" wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:49:00 +0100, Tufnell Park wrote: On 21/08/2019 14:33, Brian Gaff wrote: I'm too much of a scrooge to subscribe for Telly stuff myself, If there was a family with diverse interests, then fine but for me, nah.. I also feel that for us older folk who have enquiring minds there is a tendency for many programs to be simply retreads of better but older alternatives we have seen. I think there may well be a need for more technical programming. Maybe there is something like this on Youtube but sadly not much audio description on that. I'd like a very detailed look into semiconductor design and manufacture, or how polymer batteries are made, or perhaps more technical descriptions of the data collected in space missions. Brian You can get those type of programmes on Sky satellite tv, Discovery Channels, National Geographic, PBS America, i watch those from time to time but you would have to subscribe and it's probably not worth it for you. PBS America is on Freeview. Most of the programmes seem to be old BBC ones. No they aren't it shows an awful lot of HBO content tim -- Dave W |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 21/08/2019 14:44, tim... wrote:
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... I'm sure that has been on before it has, but I missed it come to that I missed E1-3 of this set of repeats tim they are all on the iPlayer, if you use the A-Z option after choosing BBC4 |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
I used to get all that info from a glossy mag called Scientific
American, but if you cannot see the diagrams and annotations, that's no use to you. On 21/08/2019 14:52, Brian Gaff wrote: I'm not sure they would be in depth enough explaining doping and the different diffusion techniques etc. Brian |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Andrew" wrote in message ... On 21/08/2019 14:44, tim... wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... I'm sure that has been on before it has, but I missed it come to that I missed E1-3 of this set of repeats tim they are all on the iPlayer, if you use the A-Z option after choosing BBC4 of course they are watching stuff on iPlayer sucks YMMV tim |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 22/08/2019 14:11, tim... wrote:
"Andrew" wrote in message ... they are all on the iPlayer, if you use the A-Z option after choosing BBC4 of course they are watching stuff on iPlayer sucks YMMV Use GetIPlayer? |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:25:33 +0100 Indy Jess John
posted: On 21/08/2019 12:19, Andrew wrote: On 21/08/2019 09:41, Martin wrote: On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:47:20 +0100, "Brian wrote: I just realised its been over a month since I even bothered to listen to tv, despite reading the listings of the terrestrial channels, its all rubbish, well to me it is. Have I changed or is it that I'm getting a life? Tried BBC 4? +1 Jim Al-Kalili's series on inventions is rather good, though the credits say PBS and not BBC. snip I tuned into BBC4 last night to watch how to see a Black Hole, only to find it had been replaced by repeats of Peaky Blinders. P*ss-ups and Breweries come to mind! Jim So that is how come I had recordings of Peaky Blinders on my Humax. I thought I had some how cocked up although I was not sure how I could have made such an obvious mistake. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
I remember reading about doping in a Mullard booklet about these
newfandangled transistor thingys while I was at school in the 1960s. In order to illustrate the concentration of the doping elements, which it said was about one part in fifty million, it said "Imagine a country the size of Great Britain, with just one foreigner". It's a great simile. I find it very easy to imagine the concentration in these terms, much easier in fact than to imagine anyone getting away with writing something like that today. Rod. On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:37:54 +0100, Andrew wrote: I used to get all that info from a glossy mag called Scientific American, but if you cannot see the diagrams and annotations, that's no use to you. On 21/08/2019 14:52, Brian Gaff wrote: I'm not sure they would be in depth enough explaining doping and the different diffusion techniques etc. Brian |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Andrew" wrote in message ... On 21/08/2019 09:41, Martin wrote: On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:47:20 +0100, "Brian Gaff" wrote: I just realised its been over a month since I even bothered to listen to tv, despite reading the listings of the terrestrial channels, its all rubbish, well to me it is. Have I changed or is it that I'm getting a life? Tried BBC 4? +1 Jim Al-Kalili's series on inventions is rather good, But not without unnecessary hyperbole. "The basic telescope was invented due to a *revolution* in science" Um no, it came about because someone discovered that they could make simple optical glass. Hardly a revolutionary invention. tim |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 23/08/2019 16:58, tim... wrote:
"Andrew" wrote in message ... Jim Al-Kalili's series on inventions is rather good, But not without unnecessary hyperbole. "The basic telescope was invented due to a *revolution* in science" Um no, it came about because someone discovered that they could make simple optical glass. Hardly a revolutionary invention. I'm not convinced that transparent glass wasn't invented until c15 or whenever he said; didn't the Romans make fine glass vessels? Since the first telescopes used concave eyepieces it might have needed the use of concave lenses to correct short sight to lead to their invention, if the story of people in a optician's shop is to be believed. Why would people bother to make concave lenses that just made things /smaller/? What I don't understand is why it didn't occur to people to make telescopes with two convex lenses - as later astronomical refractors used in a much superior design. You just need lenses with greatly different focal lengths. Maybe people tried and were put off by the inverted image produced, though I would have thought people would have noted the phenomenon. -- Max Demian |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
tim... wrote: Jim Al-Kalili's series on inventions is rather good, But not without unnecessary hyperbole. It does also contain some 'blurred' explanations in a few places. Overall, good though. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm biog http://jcgl.orpheusweb.co.uk/history/ups_and_downs.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WHY NOTHING BIGGER THAN 34 for DIRECT VIEW CRT HDTV ?? | greek_philosophizer | High definition TV | 30 | December 20th 04 04:24 AM |
| HD Picture; All or Nothing? | CGott | High definition TV | 6 | November 16th 04 09:09 PM |
| Thanks TiVo. Thanks for nothing | alphageek | Tivo personal television | 18 | June 18th 04 05:29 AM |
| No Program Guide-Nothing in TO DO | Mark P. | Tivo personal television | 1 | May 7th 04 02:12 AM |
| New receiver and nothing! | Vaz | Home theater (general) | 1 | June 26th 03 10:07 PM |