![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes If it's only for speech a soundbar (without sub or whatever) should be OK. Although with any such speakers, a graphic equaliser might make them clearer for speech. Sadly, a vast amount of TV speech is of remarkably poor quality. Does she have the same problem with say R4? Interesting comparison, which had not occurred to me, with my own TV listening problems. I struggle with the TV, without the sound bar, but have no problems with the radio, usually R2 or R4, usually using a portable radio bought for my 21st, 45 years ago, so not exactly top of the range 'hi fi'. -- Graeme |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 05/09/18 18:51, Graeme wrote:
In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes If it's only for speech a soundbar (without sub or whatever) should be OK. Although with any such speakers, a graphic equaliser might make them clearer for speech. Sadly, a vast amount of TV speech is of remarkably poor quality. Does she have the same problem with say R4? Interesting comparison, which had not occurred to me, with my own TV listening problems.Â* I struggle with the TV, without the sound bar, but have no problems with the radio, usually R2 or R4, usually using a portable radio bought for my 21st, 45 years ago, so not exactly top of the range 'hi fi'. Top of te range hifi is in fact exactly the wriong choice for someone with heraing difficulties. The top 4 octaves are wasted, and the bottom 4 just muddy the waters. The old '300Hz - 3kHz' with loads of intermodulatins is what partially deaf people get. Its wise to boost the 1-3Khz band massively, and roll the bass off a LOT -- “it should be clear by now to everyone that activist environmentalism (or environmental activism) is becoming a general ideology about humans, about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a 'noble' idea. It is not an honest pursuit of 'sustainable development,' a matter of elementary environmental protection, or a search for rational mechanisms designed to achieve a healthy environment. Yet things do occur that make you shake your head and remind yourself that you live neither in Joseph Stalin’s Communist era, nor in the Orwellian utopia of 1984.†Vaclav Klaus |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote: Top of te range hifi is in fact exactly the wriong choice for someone with heraing difficulties. The top 4 octaves are wasted, and the bottom 4 just muddy the waters. Must be one of your famed amplifiers if it is generating sounds on those frequencies from speech. -- *How's my driving? Call 999* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill" wrote in message ... In message , Bill Wright writes On 04/09/2018 17:09, Reentrant wrote: On 04/09/2018 14:41, Bill Wright wrote: I have a friend who struggles to hear the telly. She is not all that deaf but has a deaf aid. At present she has a newish flatscreen telly very poor sound quality. I'm wondering what I can do for her. She tried a gadget she got from RNID that is supposed to feed the TV sound into the hearing aid when it is set to T, but it wasn't very successful. She doesn't want to wear headphones. I'm wondering about a sound bar or computer speakers or whatever. Ideas anyone? Bill Techmoan tested the Sony SRS-LSR100 recently and was quite impressed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bn3hKbl9f-U&t=657s That looks very promising. Coincidentally, a friend of mine had one of these Sony's arrive yesterday. He has just been on the phone, having failed to get it to work. Apparently, it uses TOSLink, That's just one of the sources of sound from the TV it can use. which meant he had to disconnect the soundbar. He had ordered a toslink splitter with it, but that has to come separately from China. Why does he want to run them both at once ? The instructions say to set the TV output to pcm, and he says he has been down every menu and can't find this setting. He has gone off to download the TV instructions so he can print them in readable form, after which he says he will ring back if he still needs help. I guess that all I'll be able to do is offer sympathy and maybe a bit of calm, as I know little about the connections on my telly, let alone his. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 05/09/2018 00:39, Bill Wright wrote:
On 04/09/2018 17:45, David wrote: On Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:41:51 +0100, Bill Wright wrote: I have a friend who struggles to hear the telly. She is not all that deaf but has a deaf aid. At present she has a newish flatscreen telly with very poor sound quality. I'm wondering what I can do for her. She tried a gadget she got from RNID that is supposed to feed the TV sound into the hearing aid when it is set to T, but it wasn't very successful. She doesn't want to wear headphones. I'm wondering about a sound bar or computer speakers or whatever. Ideas anyone? Bill It would help to know what outputs the TV has and how up market it is. I'll have to look into that I suppose. Also, where does she sit to watch the TV; is it always the same chair or sofa? Yes. House of Lords style speaker in the back of the seat? SteveW |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Josh Nack
writes "Bill" wrote in message ... In message , Bill Wright writes On 04/09/2018 17:09, Reentrant wrote: On 04/09/2018 14:41, Bill Wright wrote: I have a friend who struggles to hear the telly. She is not all that deaf but has a deaf aid. At present she has a newish flatscreen telly very poor sound quality. I'm wondering what I can do for her. She tried a gadget she got from RNID that is supposed to feed the TV sound into the hearing aid when it is set to T, but it wasn't very successful. She doesn't want to wear headphones. I'm wondering about a sound bar or computer speakers or whatever. Ideas anyone? Bill Techmoan tested the Sony SRS-LSR100 recently and was quite impressed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bn3hKbl9f-U&t=657s That looks very promising. Coincidentally, a friend of mine had one of these Sony's arrive yesterday. He has just been on the phone, having failed to get it to work. Apparently, it uses TOSLink, That's just one of the sources of sound from the TV it can use. which meant he had to disconnect the soundbar. He had ordered a toslink splitter with it, but that has to come separately from China. Why does he want to run them both at once ? I'm not sure, but the instructions say to use toslink if possible. His wife's hearing is normal, his is not, so I assume they want a soundbar plus this device for him. I now think, after another call from him that the other toslink device is a Sony Soundbase, which is also pcm over toslink, so swapping them over should work, but doesn't. Not sure why he can't use the headphone or line out jack or what his TV has. Anyway, I've been persuaded to drive over and give a verdict tomorrow before he returns it to the supplier. -- Bill |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:08:15 +0100, Bill wrote:
[...] Techmoan tested the Sony SRS-LSR100 recently and was quite impressed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bn3hKbl9f-U&t=657s That looks very promising. Coincidentally, a friend of mine had one of these Sony's arrive yesterday. He has just been on the phone, having failed to get it to work. Apparently, it uses TOSLink, which meant he had to disconnect the soundbar. He had ordered a toslink splitter with it, but that has to come separately from China. Toslink? when I were a lad, when we wanted to connect something to something else, we had this stuff called "wire". Anything more complicated than it needed to be was generally regarded as less dependable. I haven't changed my mind. Rod. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 05/09/2018 19:11, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , The Natural Philosopher wrote: Top of te range hifi is in fact exactly the wriong choice for someone with heraing difficulties. The top 4 octaves are wasted, and the bottom 4 just muddy the waters. Must be one of your famed amplifiers if it is generating sounds on those frequencies from speech. His point still stands though that for someone with hearing difficulties you want something approximating the telephone line passband 300-3kHz for the best chance of them understanding the spoken word. TV programs do have a lot of high and low frequency components for explosions and background music which kills speech intelligibility for anyone whose hearing is marginal using an aid. Subtitles if available make a big difference (as does some basic lip reading training if the speaker on the TV is facing the camera). -- Regards, Martin Brown |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are the "tone" controls set to suit her hearing? Does she need the Treble turned up and the Bass down? ?Many people apply the wrong instinct on this and turn up the Bass |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 06/09/18 08:49, Martin Brown wrote:
On 05/09/2018 19:11, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Â*Â*Â* The Natural Philosopher wrote: Top of te range hifi is in fact exactly the wriong choice for someone with heraing difficulties. The top 4 octaves are wasted, and the bottom 4 just muddy the waters. Must be one of your famed amplifiers if it is generating sounds on those frequencies from speech. His point still stands though that for someone with hearing difficulties you want something approximating the telephone line passband 300-3kHz for the best chance of them understanding the spoken word. TV programs do have a lot of high and low frequency components for explosions and background music which kills speech intelligibility for anyone whose hearing is marginal using an aid. Subtitles if available make a big difference (as does some basic lip reading training if the speaker on the TV is facing the camera). its just plow**** being miserable again. Like all lefty****s he believes he was cut out for something better and the Filthy capitalists prevented him achieving it. Whereas I know I was cut out for something worse and only massive effort prevented it. Moving on to audio, a late deafish friend said that the problem was internal ear intermodulation distortion. The world as heard through a fuzz box so to speak. The less frequencies there were - particularly from different sources - the easier it was. Hnece te real problem of hearing with high background noise. My BIL can't follow TV with lots of people talking. My ex wifes hearing curves were salutary. started to roll off around 600hz and by the time it was 4KHz there as NOTHING left. 90dB down or more. So 300hz-3Khz is ahere it's at at best. The bass sounds can be heard but reduce intelligibility. -- "A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight and understanding". Marshall McLuhan |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Falling on deaf ears | R B Burgoyne | UK digital tv | 11 | September 27th 13 01:39 AM |
| "Secret of Crickley Hall": subtitles for the deaf on BBC!HD?! | Maurice Batey[_2_] | UK digital tv | 22 | November 22nd 12 03:31 PM |
| Signing for the deaf: PiP | Graham.[_2_] | UK digital tv | 9 | July 18th 09 07:55 PM |
| "Deaf" DVB-T tuners | -[_3_] | UK digital tv | 12 | May 27th 09 06:42 PM |
| we're not all deaf | iz0nlee | UK sky | 27 | February 25th 07 11:36 PM |