![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
I remember back in the 70's when the first electronic ignitions were
around, Cambs police had Volvo's - 144 or something like that - into which were fitted Vanguards. Transmit at any time and the car would loose 30mph almost exactly. If you were doing less than 30 it stopped. One of my colleagues in 'Cambridge Service' found the answer. The electronics were in a large plastic box (about the size of a modern under-bonnet fusebox) and thus totally unscreened. He wrapped it in tin foil, wound wire round it like string around a Christmas present, and earthed it to the battery. Sorted. -- Woody harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote in message ... "Woody" wrote in message ... "tim....." wrote in message ... "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , Jim Lesurf writes In article , Ian Jackson wrote: There was a time when amateur radio 'interference' to domestic TV, radio and Hi-Fi was almost a certainty with certain products. The problem was, of course, that the manufacturers 'forgot' that this equipment might sometimes be subjected to HF fieldstrengths of several V/m - and that it might have many feet of external wiring attached to it (aerial drop coax, speaker leads etc) which could - and did - act as fairly efficient HF receiving aerials. Often, a satisfactory cure was the addition of a 3 or 4 components costing a few pence - or even simply a slightly different design approach which essentially cost nothing in component. Most attempts to influence the manufacturers fell on very deaf ears - and probably still do. To be fair, there can be rather more to it than " 3 or 4 components costing a few pence each". It certainly can - especially if you set out to design equipment to be more-or-less interference 'bomb-proof'. Some years ago, I worked (as a software engineer) on a product that the company though that they could save a few pennies on the construction by not bothering to provide over-charge protection to the battery circuit. When in use the product lasted 6-9 months before becoming bricked. (Something which, of course, could never reasonably be tested before release) the company went bust 30 years or so ago Vauxhall brought out the Astra GTE with its electronic and part digital dashboad. No-one had bothered to test it for RF sensitivity. The Astra GTE was very popular as a lease car with Gas Board radio engineers who promptly fitted AM transceivers in them - and quickly found the problem. Tx, no issue, but speak into the mic and the rev counter and temp gauge went full scale and the speedo and fuel gauge went to zero. What is more they stayed there until the ingition was power cycled (the first power-on-reset?) The problem was passed back by Vauxhall to Delco who made the instrument cluster assembly. Aften about four months work they found that the cure was qty 3 1nF ceramic caps, cost (in quantity) 2p each. They decided it was too expensive. Woody harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com I could run 100w SSB HF until I replaced the bosch MAF with a cheap chinky replacement now when I TX the engine stops ...... On a similar note this (+ a bit of history) is why filling stations dont allow mobile phone use on their forecourts. i.e. Nowt to do with fire hazzard. Even Myth Busters couldnt prove it!! 'In the 80s'.....when CB radio was popular certain persons used to boost their EMR by use of 'burners'.... an RF amp. At some point someone found that if you keyed your mic a few times after you'd completed filling your car up, the pump forgot how much fuel it had dispensed, and presented an irrational figure.... either way too high or low. So frequently they would be sent on their way without paying, whilst the forecourt owner had to call in the engineers. Since the cause was found, they just do not like people using RF kit on their forecourt, just in case it causes the same probem again. .....probably because the manufacturers wont accept any losses caused by such events! Thing is, they never tell the Police to turn their kit off when they pull in, as some constantly transmit their location. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , Jim GM4DHJ ... writes "Woody" wrote in message ... "tim....." wrote in message ... "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , Jim Lesurf writes In article , Ian Jackson wrote: There was a time when amateur radio 'interference' to domestic TV, radio and Hi-Fi was almost a certainty with certain products. The problem was, of course, that the manufacturers 'forgot' that this equipment might sometimes be subjected to HF fieldstrengths of several V/m - and that it might have many feet of external wiring attached to it (aerial drop coax, speaker leads etc) which could - and did - act as fairly efficient HF receiving aerials. Often, a satisfactory cure was the addition of a 3 or 4 components costing a few pence - or even simply a slightly different design approach which essentially cost nothing in component. Most attempts to influence the manufacturers fell on very deaf ears - and probably still do. To be fair, there can be rather more to it than " 3 or 4 components costing a few pence each". It certainly can - especially if you set out to design equipment to be more-or-less interference 'bomb-proof'. Some years ago, I worked (as a software engineer) on a product that the company though that they could save a few pennies on the construction by not bothering to provide over-charge protection to the battery circuit. When in use the product lasted 6-9 months before becoming bricked. (Something which, of course, could never reasonably be tested before release) the company went bust 30 years or so ago Vauxhall brought out the Astra GTE with its electronic and part digital dashboad. No-one had bothered to test it for RF sensitivity. The Astra GTE was very popular as a lease car with Gas Board radio engineers who promptly fitted AM transceivers in them - and quickly found the problem. Tx, no issue, but speak into the mic and the rev counter and temp gauge went full scale and the speedo and fuel gauge went to zero. What is more they stayed there until the ingition was power cycled (the first power-on-reset?) The problem was passed back by Vauxhall to Delco who made the instrument cluster assembly. Aften about four months work they found that the cure was qty 3 1nF ceramic caps, cost (in quantity) 2p each. They decided it was too expensive. Woody harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com I could run 100w SSB HF until I replaced the bosch MAF with a cheap chinky replacement now when I TX the engine stops ...... When indicating left, 40W on 145MHz caused my circa 2000 Focus's left indicator to flash a lot faster. Indicating right was OK. No other problems. According to the owner's handbook, a 2004 New Astra I had was RF specced at 10W on any frequency. merc book says 100w maximum on HF but that would only apply with the £150 bosch MAF not the £15 chinky one ..... tee hee Of course, 434MHz door and ignition keys are known to have problems when there are nearby amateur transmissions in the 432MHz band. [Why do they need to use RF? In the 1980s, I found that a Sierra infrared key worked fine.] Ian my ford mustang is unaffected being on 315Mc/s ....... |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of course, 434MHz door and ignition keys are known to have problems when there are nearby amateur transmissions in the 432MHz band. [Why do they need to use RF? In the 1980s, I found that a Sierra infrared key worked fine.] Ian my ford mustang is unaffected being on 315Mc/s ....... so no chance of hammy mens keeping me out of the car by Txing from their pockets on 432.92 Mc/s |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interference | Brian Gaff | UK digital tv | 7 | April 28th 09 06:15 PM |
| DVB-T interference | GTS | UK digital tv | 19 | May 30th 08 08:43 PM |
| Interference on DTV | [email protected] | UK digital tv | 2 | September 29th 06 04:03 PM |
| Interference? | Alan | UK home cinema | 4 | January 17th 06 10:01 AM |
| TV interference | Stu | UK home cinema | 1 | April 29th 05 01:04 AM |