![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:47:19 +0100, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: Yes, I saw one of those many moons ago. It had, I think a Fireball tuner in it. I'm sure others could be used though, not much to choose. With regard to drift on the sound receivers for fm at uhf, the one I had had a kind of self locking setting on a button. That worked well at uhf, but the am sound on vhf, particularly itv did drift a bit. They used those Mullard tuners 1042 and 1043. I used to test and align m modules with those back in the day. Some very crude dodges to stop uhf instability at times, like taking the lid off and bending the lines inside.. grin. Now we seem to all have little miniscule things as tuners. Brian Those were probebly the first thing I worked on that had SMD components. We didn't get any special tools or soldering arrangements though. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Gaff wrote:
I have a commercial one, probably won't work now, by Motion Electronics. Has the usual varicap twiddle buttons on the front and the inners click to select band 1 3 and uhf. Brian, did you mean "varicap"? -- SteveT |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve Thackery wrote:
Brian, did you mean "varicap"? Sorry, I should have worded that much better. I was asking if the tuner used varicap diodes, or air-spaced variable capacitors with moveable vanes. -- SteveT |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:13:41 -0500, "Steve Thackery"
wrote: Steve Thackery wrote: Brian, did you mean "varicap"? Sorry, I should have worded that much better. I was asking if the tuner used varicap diodes, or air-spaced variable capacitors with moveable vanes. I am sure he meant varicap because he mentioned the multi-turn pot push button units. The ELC1042 was available in the late '70s and the 1043 a bit later. The 1042 would tune down to the amateur ATV part of 70cms without any modification. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Graham. wrote:
I am sure he meant varicap because he mentioned the multi-turn pot push button units. The ELC1042 was available in the late '70s and the 1043 a bit later. The 1042 would tune down to the amateur ATV part of 70cms without any modification. That's fascinating - thanks, Graham. -- SteveT |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Steve Thackery
scribeth thus Graham. wrote: I am sure he meant varicap because he mentioned the multi-turn pot push button units. The ELC1042 was available in the late '70s and the 1043 a bit later. The 1042 would tune down to the amateur ATV part of 70cms without any modification. That's fascinating - thanks, Graham. Still have a Panasonic TV that was designed for sound it has a small 5 inch screen on it and years ago I added in a meter on the front that measured the AGC line and put a few rechargeable batteries therein and for quite sometime it was very useful for sorting out "Ghosting" as you could take it up on the roof top with you and see the picture as you moved the aerial around. Now sadly redundant, must get around to taking out the very nice Sifam meter before it goes to the tip... -- Tony Sayer |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
"tony sayer" wrote in message
... Now sadly redundant, must get around to taking out the very nice Sifam meter before it goes to the tip... How is signal strength and quality (freedom from multi-path) determined nowadays when aerials are installed? Is it done by meter or by looking at the end result by watching channels on each of the multiplexes? I know that a lot of set top boxes have some form of signal strength display for each mux, but you don't usually get any indication as whether you've got a strong signal that's denatured by lots of multipath and co-channel interference. I forgot to watch when we had our aerial upgraded to a wideband one (the older grouped aerial for analogue was deaf to one of the multiplexes). When I had an aerial fitted about 15 years ago, when analogue was still the main means of reception, the fitter had a device very much like you describe: a small TV screen and a signal strength meter, fitted into a rugged case. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
NY wrote:
"tony sayer" wrote in message ... Now sadly redundant, must get around to taking out the very nice Sifam meter before it goes to the tip... How is signal strength and quality determined nowadays when aerials are installed? Various test gear will give signal strength, s/n raio, and Bit Error Ratio. http://www.pulsat.com/products/Proma...d=Cj0KEQjwlK2i BRDk0Jnjso6AgM0BEiQAdX-iYxx4-2HzhAS6BDwfKzM6wTaSWXN4Vaiqycryfxplf-caAl6T8P8HAQ Bill |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:54:12 +0100
"Brian Gaff" wrote: Peak Sound? I saw one of those, but it did not have a hum ehen I heard it, so maybe you were the victim of the old kit problem of alternative components supplied which was a real pain. Brian Might have been. It had a folded drilled aluminium chassis, and all parts were mounted to it. Long gone now, it gave way to a Goodmans Module 80 Receiver, which I still have. I repaired that (it gained a sudden hum!) a couple of years ago, with much appreciated help from these 'ere newsgroup folks. -- Davey. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ye olde Humax DTT boxes | Bill Wright[_2_] | UK digital tv | 2 | September 4th 11 11:19 AM |
| USB tv tuners: Tried one? | [email protected] | High definition TV | 10 | May 25th 06 10:32 PM |
| OTA tuners | Hobo | High definition TV | 14 | January 28th 06 08:08 AM |
| Built In Tuners vs. Separate Tuners | Moody | High definition TV | 17 | October 12th 05 09:58 PM |
| best DTV tuners? | [email protected] | High definition TV | 2 | July 26th 05 11:26 PM |