![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does anyone know the political and financial reasons why Al Jazeera
occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? Its presence seems to have little to do with proving the public with the best possible service. Bill |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 29/12/2013 16:12, Bill Wright wrote:
Does anyone know the political and financial reasons why Al Jazeera occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? Its presence seems to have little to do with proving the public with the best possible service. Bill because they paid for it. -- Gareth. That fly.... Is your magic wand. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:12:21 +0000, Bill Wright
wrote: Does anyone know the political and financial reasons why Al Jazeera occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? Its presence seems to have little to do with proving the public with the best possible service. How do you know? I think it provides good quality journalism with no obvious signs of bias. Educating and informing the public follows the best traditions of broadcasting and a plurality of sources of news can only be a good thing. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Wright wrote:
Does anyone know [...] why Al Jazeera occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? Prized? AIUI COM7 isn't full yet, COM8 is (or will soon be) available, channels like Five and Film4 that arguably would benefit more from HD aren't queueing up to pay ... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Scott
writes On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:12:21 +0000, Bill Wright wrote: Does anyone know the political and financial reasons why Al Jazeera occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? Its presence seems to have little to do with proving the public with the best possible service. How do you know? I think it provides good quality journalism with no obvious signs of bias. Educating and informing the public follows the best traditions of broadcasting and a plurality of sources of news can only be a good thing. There is quite a lot of alternative news and other items on Al Jazeera (and on Russia Today) - stuff you (will) never get on the BBC or ITV. -- Ian |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... On 29/12/2013 16:12, Bill Wright wrote: Does anyone know the political and financial reasons why Al Jazeera occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? Its presence seems to have little to do with proving the public with the best possible service. Bill because they paid for it.# and more to the point they offered to pay more than the next contestant, for it |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Bill Wright wrote: Does anyone know the political and financial reasons why Al Jazeera occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? That's capitalism for you. -- Richard |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scott wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:12:21 +0000, Bill Wright wrote: Does anyone know the political and financial reasons why Al Jazeera occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? Its presence seems to have little to do with proving the public with the best possible service. How do you know? I think it provides good quality journalism with no obvious signs of bias. Educating and informing the public follows the best traditions of broadcasting and a plurality of sources of news can only be a good thing. You are obviously a Reithian, and to some extent so am I. "Don't give them what they want, give them what (we the intelligensia) believe they need." However if you think the masses should be offered diverse news sources I would have thought you'd want to spread the sources across the political spectrum. I wonder if Fox News would be prepared to produce a UK version, to balance the BBC News? Nothing too extreme of course: 'Telegraph' to balance 'Guardian'. I wonder where Al Jaz would have figured if one of the TV listings mags had conducted a poll of their readers: What extra channels would like like in HD? I must say Al Jaz's picture quality puts some other HD channels to shame. It remains though, astonishing to someone brought up with the principles of public service broadcasting that a minority interest foreign channel gets such prominence. Bill |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andy Burns wrote:
Bill Wright wrote: Does anyone know [...] why Al Jazeera occupies one of the prized HD slots on UK terrestrial TV? Prized? AIUI COM7 isn't full yet, COM8 is (or will soon be) available, channels like Five and Film4 that arguably would benefit more from HD aren't queueing up to pay ... And yet according to OFCOM spectrum is so very scarce. Like gold it is. Hence we have no mux 7 or 8 on many transmitters for fear of CCI. I think (incidentally) that Five will have to provide free HD before too long. As more and more people get HD tellys they are going to lose audience. I don't bother looking what's on Five (except I look for fishing progs for father) because I can't see the point of watching SD when there's more HD progs on than I have time for. Bill |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
tim..... wrote:
they offered to pay more than the next contestant, for it And yet those airwaves belong to the people. Bill |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|