![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/1/2013 3:48 PM, TJ wrote:
On 07/01/2013 10:23 AM, R. Mark Clayton wrote: "TJ" wrote in message ... Over the years sets continued to improve, and what was once acceptable was no longer so - much of the time - but I still found B&W to be acceptable in a battery portable and a small bedroom TV, and would still be OK with it need be. Well try watching snooker then: - B&W - well apart from the black and white balls they all look the same. PAL - better, but which is the brown ball? D[2]-MAC or SD digital - yes now we see what is going on. HD digital - lovely oops I forgot NTSC - er I thought the baize was green?... Typos, too lazy to proofread properly - my post was meant to say "would still be OK with it if need be." I stand by that statement - I don't care to watch snooker, even in HD. In the main, color is nice, but not absolutely necessary most of the time. As I said, acceptability depends on the eye of the beholder. The first colorized B&W film I remember seeing was "Miracle On 34th Street." (Maureen O'Hara, Edmund Gwen, Natalie Wood, 1947) Seeing it in color was an interesting novelty, but after seeing both versions several times over the years I can't say color really adds much to the experience. I watched "Bonanza" on B&W sets the first time around - as I see the reruns in color I don't enjoy them any more or less than I did then. Same thing with "Star Trek." And the reruns of B&W TV shows from the 50's and early 60's are as enjoyable or non-enjoyable now as they were then - but the lack of color isn't the deciding factor in that. TJ The absolute best digital filter is between ones ears. Before HD there was color. Before color there was black and white. Before black and white there was radio. Before radio was books. Before books was telling stories around fire. Before telling stories there was daydreaming. It is both our blessing and our curse. Tee(the other )Jay |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 2013-07-01, whosbest54 wrote:
Yes, my 4x3 TVs have a letterboxed picture for 16x9 content. I can accept that for most of what I watch on those sets. All converters should be able to allow the aspect ratio to be changed; the best have a 'zoom' button to allow aspect ratio changes on the fly. My Digital Stream converters have this feature on the remote. Normally I have the zoom set to fill the screen, but on some programs that doesn't seem to work. When I press the "zoom" button on those it just says "Orthoponic" or some such thing on the screen and the letterbox black bars remain. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Blake (Change "invalid" to "com" for email. Google Groups killfiled.) "Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with environmental protection... the next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world's resources will be negotiated." -- Ottmar Edenhofer, IPCC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roger Blake" wrote in message
... On 2013-07-01, whosbest54 wrote: Yes, my 4x3 TVs have a letterboxed picture for 16x9 content. I can accept that for most of what I watch on those sets. All converters should be able to allow the aspect ratio to be changed; the best have a 'zoom' button to allow aspect ratio changes on the fly. My Digital Stream converters have this feature on the remote. Normally I have the zoom set to fill the screen, but on some programs that doesn't seem to work. When I press the "zoom" button on those it just says "Orthoponic" or some such thing on the screen and the letterbox black bars remain. Anamorphic? |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 07/02/2013 08:42 AM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2013-07-01, whosbest54 wrote: Yes, my 4x3 TVs have a letterboxed picture for 16x9 content. I can accept that for most of what I watch on those sets. All converters should be able to allow the aspect ratio to be changed; the best have a 'zoom' button to allow aspect ratio changes on the fly. My Digital Stream converters have this feature on the remote. Normally I have the zoom set to fill the screen, but on some programs that doesn't seem to work. When I press the "zoom" button on those it just says "Orthoponic" or some such thing on the screen and the letterbox black bars remain. Neither my Insignia or my Digital Stream converter boxes will allow me to change the aspect ratio on SD sub-channels. On those channels, usually broadcasting a 4:3 signal, letterboxing is done by the station, not by your converter. TJ |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
"TJ" wrote in message ... snip The first colorized B&W film I remember seeing was "Miracle On 34th Street." (Maureen O'Hara, Edmund Gwen, Natalie Wood, 1947) Seeing it in color was an interesting novelty, but after seeing both versions several times over the years I can't say color really adds much to the experience. I watched "Bonanza" on B&W sets the first time around - as I see the reruns in color I don't enjoy them any more or less than I did then. Same thing with "Star Trek." And the reruns of B&W TV shows from the 50's and early 60's are as enjoyable or non-enjoyable now as they were then - but the lack of color isn't the deciding factor in that. My first color set was a 14-inch "portable." It weighed a lot, but it had a handle on top of the case. Therefore, portable. In 1968, I think color TV's had n-o-t-h-i-n-g that was automatic beyond degaussing but I was able to tune my set for very nice pictures with a simple routine: First, rotating the fine-tuning ring into the "worms," the squigly pattern caused by too much sound carrier ... and then just back out of the worms. Second, turning the Color control down all the way and adjusting Brightness and Contrast for a nice B&W picture. (I believe if a set cannot produce a nice B&W picture, it cannot produce a nice color picture.) Third, turning the Color control up too much and adjusting the Tint to make the faces be a hideous orange. Fourth, turning the Color control back down until faces looked natural. This routine usually took about fifteen seconds -- not unreasonable. The first set I bought that had "automatic everything" was a 35-inch Sony in 1995. It had a synthesized tuner, so no Fine Tune. I set the controls for Brightness, Contrast, Sharpness, Color and Tint for my preferences during the first two days and never touched them again until the set was quite old and I tried to improve its fast-fading picture. "Sal" |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roger Blake" wrote in message ... My Digital Stream converters have this feature on the remote. Normally I have the zoom set to fill the screen, but on some programs that doesn't seem to work. When I press the "zoom" button on those it just says "Orthoponic" or some such thing on the screen and the letterbox black bars remain. I miss my Digital Stream box. In the fall of 2011, I loaned it to the son of some people I know down the street. I haven't seen it or the kid since. His parents claim they haven't seen him either. *sigh* Old slogan: "Neither a borrower nor a lender be." |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/1/13 PDT 7:23 AM, R. Mark Clayton wrote:
Well try watching snooker then: - B&W - well apart from the black and white balls they all look the same. PAL - better, but which is the brown ball? D[2]-MAC or SD digital - yes now we see what is going on. HD digital - lovely oops I forgot NTSC - er I thought the baize was green?... Heh. I recall how jealous I was of my Brit friends with many more lines of definition! Back when Never Twice the Same Color was the only choice in the States. How widespread is HD TV in GB now? (Approx. I'd guess over half the US has HD now that is in use.) |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article John McWilliams writes:
Heh. I recall how jealous I was of my Brit friends with many more lines of definition! Back when Never Twice the Same Color was the only choice in the States. Having watched PAL when visiting the UK, I know why they call it Picture's Always Lousy. And that was ignoring the flicker and low temporal resolution (both of which were clearly visible). After stable solid state equipment became available in the early 1970's, the PAL phase error cancellation was no longer an advantage. All of my equipment was chosen to be good enough to be "set it and forget it". Then, color variation was a matter of source lighting, which affects all color systems. Alan |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 28/07/2013 16:54, John McWilliams wrote:
On 7/1/13 PDT 7:23 AM, R. Mark Clayton wrote: Well try watching snooker then: - B&W - well apart from the black and white balls they all look the same. PAL - better, but which is the brown ball? D[2]-MAC or SD digital - yes now we see what is going on. HD digital - lovely oops I forgot NTSC - er I thought the baize was green?... Heh. I recall how jealous I was of my Brit friends with many more lines of definition! Back when Never Twice the Same Color was the only choice in the States. How widespread is HD TV in GB now? (Approx. I'd guess over half the US has HD now that is in use.) there's a lot on pay tv but only 4 channels through an aerial. hd televisions have been on sale here for years but only in the last couple have they had hd tuners inside - some were sold as HD ready with just component inputs - not even HDMI. -- Gareth. That fly.... Is your magic wand. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Belmont reception in Dore, and other matters | Bill Wright[_2_] | UK digital tv | 7 | November 12th 11 12:45 PM |
| Size matters! 150-inch plasma screen TV will be on sale next year | eBuyHD.com | High definition TV | 2 | October 2nd 08 09:10 PM |
| [Format matters] Toshiba officially throws in the towel. Fat ladysings gloriously. | Alan Browne | High definition TV | 0 | February 19th 08 11:59 PM |
| [Format matters] Blu-ray racks up more wins over HD-DVD, fat ladywarming up for final act. | Alan Browne | High definition TV | 0 | February 16th 08 07:06 PM |
| Your opinion matters: Online academic survey ($10 reward possible) | [email protected] | High definition TV | 0 | March 22nd 06 01:12 AM |