![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 02:19:01 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:
wrote: On 22 Jun, Bill Wright wrote: Martin wrote: . A lot of the gnats **** is made in Tadcaster. J Smiths isn't a brewery it's a chemical factory. They're not the only Smith in Tadcaster, Try Sam. No I won't drink Sams on principle. http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/8431...beer_branding/ He should be extradited over the hill for that. Not sure if he is still alive but for many decades the arsehole that ran Sam Smiths was reported to have objected every single planning application in the Tadcaster area, presumably in an attempt to try and keep the place exactly the same 'forever' As a result some have called Tadcaster a ********, others a piece of London in the North, different words, same meaning. ![]() -- |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Wright wrote:
Steve Terry wrote: I think i'm safe to say that John Smiths will never appear in a CAMRA recommendation The handpulled version must put a lot of inexperienced drinkers off handpulled beer. Bill I have to confess here and now of an appallingly stupid action on my part today Whilst in the Admiral Byng pub Potters Bar in an attempt to refresh my distant memory of just what John Smiths extra cold tastes like i ordered a pint and drank it, and yes it's as awful as i remembered I'm so ashamed i'll get my coat. Steve Terry -- Get a free GiffGaff PAYG Sim and £5 bonus after activation at: http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/gfourwwk |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Martin wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:55:35 +0200, Martin wrote: On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:08:20 +0100, "Steve Terry" wrote: Bill Wright wrote: Steve Terry wrote: I think i'm safe to say that John Smiths will never appear in a CAMRA recommendation The handpulled version must put a lot of inexperienced drinkers off handpulled beer. Bill I have to confess here and now of an appallingly stupid action on my part today Whilst in the Admiral Byng pub Potters Bar in an attempt to refresh my distant memory of just what John Smiths extra cold tastes like i ordered a pint and drank it, and yes it's as awful as i remembered Not as awful as when it is warm and you can taste it :-) I'm so ashamed i'll get my coat. The best thing to do to irradiate the memory is to drink a pint of chemical lager as soon as possible. The spelling checker mangled "eradicate" but maybe it was right. Irradiation will probably be the only way i'd be able to forget the taste Steve Terry -- Get a free GiffGaff PAYG Sim and £5 bonus after activation at: http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/gfourwwk |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message
... On 23 Jun, "Woody" wrote: A former colleague used to live in Lewes and was always going on about Harveys. I went there on business, visited their brewery shop and bought a few bottles. I hadn't the heart to tell her. Shall we say I think I prefer John Smiths? Burn the Heretic! Ah, you have clearly never come across Copper Dragon made in Skipton, Timothy Taylor's made in Keighley, or Black Sheep made in Masham. IMO they would all give Harveys a run for its money and possibly just edge it. -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Martin
writes Good beer seems to travel better than it used to. As do usenet threads. :-) -- Simon 12) The Second Rule of Expectations An EXPECTATION is a Premeditated resentment. |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
alan wrote: On 30/06/2013 00:15, wrote: Unfortunately good beer doesn't travel well, the output of the modern chemical plants (AKA 'breweries') does. It's just as crap at the other end. All beer travels well. .... no it doesn't. Why do you think India Pale Ale was invented? -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Martin
writes On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 23:28:25 +0100, alan wrote: On 30/06/2013 00:15, wrote: Unfortunately good beer doesn't travel well, the output of the modern chemical plants (AKA 'breweries') does. It's just as crap at the other end. All beer travels well. If you get a S**t pint it was either like that when it left the brewery or the publican doesn't know how to keep ale in good condition. I agree with you. IPA used to travel from England to India. I believe that proper IPA was/is considerably stronger than ordinary pub swilling beer (more like 7.5% than 4.5%). This was to make sure that it didn't go off during the long sea journey. I never buy IPA which is less than 6.5%. -- Ian |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Martin wrote: On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:48:29 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Martin writes On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 23:28:25 +0100, alan wrote: On 30/06/2013 00:15, wrote: Unfortunately good beer doesn't travel well, the output of the modern chemical plants (AKA 'breweries') does. It's just as crap at the other end. All beer travels well. If you get a S**t pint it was either like that when it left the brewery or the publican doesn't know how to keep ale in good condition. I agree with you. IPA used to travel from England to India. I believe that proper IPA was/is considerably stronger than ordinary pub swilling beer (more like 7.5% than 4.5%). This was to make sure that it didn't go off during the long sea journey. I never buy IPA which is less than 6.5%. Read the link about IPA myths that I posted. IPA had higher hop content, which doesn;t explain why near hop free fizzy chemical drinks travel all over the world, nor why their sales are so high. IPA to India went in wooden barrels - modern fizzy stuff goes in pressurised sealed kegs. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Martin
wrote: On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:29:49 +0100, charles wrote: In article , Martin wrote: On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:48:29 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Martin writes On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 23:28:25 +0100, alan wrote: On 30/06/2013 00:15, wrote: Unfortunately good beer doesn't travel well, the output of the modern chemical plants (AKA 'breweries') does. It's just as crap at the other end. All beer travels well. If you get a S**t pint it was either like that when it left the brewery or the publican doesn't know how to keep ale in good condition. I agree with you. IPA used to travel from England to India. I believe that proper IPA was/is considerably stronger than ordinary pub swilling beer (more like 7.5% than 4.5%). This was to make sure that it didn't go off during the long sea journey. I never buy IPA which is less than 6.5%. Read the link about IPA myths that I posted. IPA had higher hop content, which doesn;t explain why near hop free fizzy chemical drinks travel all over the world, nor why their sales are so high. IPA to India went in wooden barrels - modern fizzy stuff goes in pressurised sealed kegs. How does that explain high sales of chemical factory gnats ****? too many people have delicate palates -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Humax Freesat Tune Q | Tom E | UK digital tv | 16 | April 18th 09 11:35 AM |
| new humax freesat HD reciever | far-lands[_2_] | UK sky | 7 | November 6th 08 12:03 PM |
| Humax Freesat PVR | Mark Carver | UK digital tv | 19 | September 19th 08 11:22 PM |
| BBC HD a little dark Humax Freesat? | David | UK digital tv | 1 | May 10th 08 12:39 PM |