![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 04/05/2013 03:40, Bill Wright wrote:
We've been asked to install a system in which various BBC TV channels will be carried, but on a mux that will be generated at the head-end. Does anyone know what happens about the teletext? Bill As for as digital teletext is concerned, isn't this actually carried as another "TV channel" but formatted as data, which is then accessible via the red button/text button. So you'd need to carry the BBC data channel(s) and ensure that the set top boxes are MHEG5 compliant in order to offer the red button/text services from the BBC channels If you are converting to an analogue baseband video and audio and then re-digitising into a digital mux, then you will lose the teletext and subtitles. Why not just pass the whole BBC mux through unscathed? that is a lot less hassle and expense? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 04/05/2013 10:56, Bill Wright wrote:
Mark Carver wrote: Stephen H wrote: Why not just pass the whole BBC mux through unscathed? that is a lot less hassle and expense? That would get my vote. Otherwise it's going to get incredibly tricky, and would probably require writing lots of bespoke code, and building a bespoke processor ! if you wish to effectively re configure the BBC Mux by chopping out, or adding other services to a locally generated mux ? To comply with the requirement we have to distribute nine TV channels only. These will in reality be something like: BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, ITV1, ITV2, ITV3, Sky News, Channel Four, Channel 5. So we can either distribute them as analogue signals or as two muxes. There's no problem in building our own muxes; this can be done from the AV outputs of a row of DTT receivers. But what about the text and subtitles? If you think the requirement is a bit bonkers, blame the government. Bill Is this job for one of Her Majesty's hotels? S. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
We've been asked to install a system in which various BBC TV channels
will be carried, but on a mux that will be generated at the head-end. Does anyone know what happens about the teletext? Bill |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stephen H wrote:
Why not just pass the whole BBC mux through unscathed? that is a lot less hassle and expense? That would get my vote. Otherwise it's going to get incredibly tricky, and would probably require writing lots of bespoke code, and building a bespoke processor ! if you wish to effectively re configure the BBC Mux by chopping out, or adding other services to a locally generated mux ? -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Carver wrote:
Stephen H wrote: Why not just pass the whole BBC mux through unscathed? that is a lot less hassle and expense? That would get my vote. Otherwise it's going to get incredibly tricky, and would probably require writing lots of bespoke code, and building a bespoke processor ! if you wish to effectively re configure the BBC Mux by chopping out, or adding other services to a locally generated mux ? Although it wasn't clear what was being asked, I think any attempt to separate the MHEG and video streams would raise copyright issues. Actually, although I've never got that deep into it, I've sometimes wondered if DTT is actually only teletext, but some of it happens to have a full screen video component, i.e. I wondered if the channels are actually defined by the MHEG stream, and the MHEG application then selects the video stream to show. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
David Woolley wrote:
I've sometimes wondered if DTT is actually only teletext, but some of it happens to have a full screen video component, i.e. I wondered if the channels are actually defined by the MHEG stream, and the MHEG application then selects the video stream to show. I tend to think not, based on how slow to load the channels are that are MHEG, and that channels work on devices that don't even have MHEG. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Carver wrote:
Stephen H wrote: Why not just pass the whole BBC mux through unscathed? that is a lot less hassle and expense? That would get my vote. Otherwise it's going to get incredibly tricky, and would probably require writing lots of bespoke code, and building a bespoke processor ! if you wish to effectively re configure the BBC Mux by chopping out, or adding other services to a locally generated mux ? To comply with the requirement we have to distribute nine TV channels only. These will in reality be something like: BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, ITV1, ITV2, ITV3, Sky News, Channel Four, Channel 5. So we can either distribute them as analogue signals or as two muxes. There's no problem in building our own muxes; this can be done from the AV outputs of a row of DTT receivers. But what about the text and subtitles? If you think the requirement is a bit bonkers, blame the government. Bill |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Wright wrote:
Mark Carver wrote: Stephen H wrote: Why not just pass the whole BBC mux through unscathed? that is a lot less hassle and expense? That would get my vote. Otherwise it's going to get incredibly tricky, and would probably require writing lots of bespoke code, and building a bespoke processor ! if you wish to effectively re configure the BBC Mux by chopping out, or adding other services to a locally generated mux ? To comply with the requirement we have to distribute nine TV channels only. These will in reality be something like: BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, ITV1, ITV2, ITV3, Sky News, Channel Four, Channel 5. So we can either distribute them as analogue signals or as two muxes. There's no problem in building our own muxes; this can be done from the AV outputs of a row of DTT receivers. But what about the text and subtitles? I'd forget about the text if contractually possible. As for subtitles, burn them in permanely, or provide two versions of each channel (which is what Center Parcs do at their Cumbria site. (Not that I'm suggesting Center Parcs is a prison !) -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 04 May 2013 10:56:13 +0100, Bill Wright
wrote: To comply with the requirement we have to distribute nine TV channels only. These will in reality be something like: BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, ITV1, ITV2, ITV3, Sky News, Channel Four, Channel 5. No BBC4? Rod. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Wright wrote:
To comply with the requirement we have to distribute nine TV channels only. These will in reality be something like: BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, ITV1, ITV2, ITV3, Sky News, Channel Four, Channel 5. So we can either distribute them as analogue signals or as two muxes. I suppose it's not your line, but I know of one 'establishment' that distributes a filtered set of channels by multicast IPTV. http://www.exterity.com/products/gateways/gateways.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Teletext on C4 | Kennedy McEwen | UK digital tv | 7 | September 24th 05 11:54 AM |
| Teletext C? | John Porcella | UK digital tv | 3 | December 15th 04 09:14 PM |
| What's this 'Teletext C' ? | J.Michael Davison | UK digital tv | 0 | October 13th 04 12:52 AM |
| Does HDTV support Teletext? DTV (Sky-Australia + Sky-NZ [Pace Decoders] supports teletext.) | http://HireMe.geek.nz/ | High definition TV | 2 | September 24th 04 02:31 PM |
| teletext PID | Robert Koechl | UK digital tv | 0 | June 2nd 04 10:49 PM |