genuine pic

mark wrote:
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/11023364/photo%20%282%29.jpg

Here's Brad
http://brads-aerials-sheffield.co.uk/

http://brads-aerials-sheffield.co.uk/services
The installation in the pictu
Contract UHF aerials; no balun; group A has a reflector less that 0.5
wavelength at ch 21.
Top aerial has loose cable.
Middle aerial is an end mounted 15 element -- rather likely that the
boom will snap near the clamp.
Too much weight there for a 1.25" mast IMO.
Is the FM aerial upside down?

Bill

Ian Jackson wrote:

I see question marks

I'm seeing spots drifting about at random, and the occasional bright
flash. It that because my computer is old?

Bill

"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
Ian Jackson wrote:

I see question marks

I'm seeing spots drifting about at random, and the occasional bright
flash. It that because my computer is old?

No, it's 'cos you are old. (Ducks[1])

[1] That was a voluntary lowering of the head, not a term of endearment.

--
Max Demian

"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
mark wrote:
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/11023364/photo%20%282%29.jpg

Here's Brad
http://brads-aerials-sheffield.co.uk/

http://brads-aerials-sheffield.co.uk/services
The installation in the pictu
Contract UHF aerials; no balun; group A has a reflector less that 0.5
wavelength at ch 21.
Top aerial has loose cable.
Middle aerial is an end mounted 15 element -- rather likely that the boom
will snap near the clamp.
Too much weight there for a 1.25" mast IMO.
Is the FM aerial upside down?


Be fair! He has installed it outside.

mark

"Andy Burns" wrote in message
...

Ian Jackson wrote:

I see question marks in the follow-up - but in the original, apart from
the mus, all I saw was a load of squares, ie "????? µ?? ??? µ????
?????? µ????? ??????? ??????µ? ??? µ?? ???µ????? ??? ????? ??? ??
?? ????????????, ??? ???
?? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ?? ???????."

Ah! My squares have been transformed into question marks.

The wonders of WTF-8

You mean WTF ate the Greek characters?

"Andy Champ" wrote in message
. uk...

On 05/04/2013 09:24, Martin wrote:
I carried an 8 metre dinghy mast on a roof rack once.

That's a lot of dinghy. What was it? (Mine is only about 6...)

Andy

I have some spam emails which reckon they can help to enlarge yours...

Bill Wright wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote:

I see question marks

I'm seeing spots drifting about at random, and the occasional bright
flash. It that because my computer is old?

No, it's vitreous detachment. If the glass in your monitor is clipped
in properly and it persists, you need to see your optician.

Seriously!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posteri...ous_detachment

In message , mark
writes

"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/11023364/photo%20%282%29.jpg

Here's Brad
http://brads-aerials-sheffield.co.uk/

"All of our work is fully guaranteed, with no VAT charged."

Is that legal?
--
Kennedy

Kennedy McEwen wrote:

mark writes

"All of our work is fully guaranteed, with no VAT charged."

Is that legal?

If you're under the VAT threshold (£77,000 pa) then yes.

On 05/04/2013 17:28, Kennedy McEwen wrote:
In message , mark
writes

"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/11023364/photo%20%282%29.jpg

Here's Brad
http://brads-aerials-sheffield.co.uk/

"All of our work is fully guaranteed, with no VAT charged."

Is that legal?

It is possible to dream up a way in which it might be legal (other than
the obvious of the entire business being below the VAT threshold of, I
think, £77,000).

Imagine that they operate as two organisations - one sells aerials,
cable, fittings, etc., the other supplies a rigging service. The rigging
service might be below VAT threshold while the supplies side is over. Or
even both might be below.

So the _work_ is with no VAT charged - but there is normal VAT on all
materials.

Whether they'd be able to keep that going is another matter. HMRC might
deem it to be one operation.

--
Rod