A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » UK digital tv
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OT[?]: Video player for hospital?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 28th 13, 12:23 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Stephen Wolstenholme[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:25:24 -0000, "Robin" wrote:

- battery life: I am sure the hospital won't allow PSUs plugged into
their sockets so need several hours minimum between recharges;


Because of a chronic health problem I am in hospital for days, weeks
or sometimes months at a time. I always take a laptop and a phone.
Both are plugged in recharging as required and nobody has ever
objected. The possible interference with medical equipment has long
been disproved apart from very rare occasions when very sensitive
monitoring is being done.

Steve

--
EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com
SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com
JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com

  #12  
Old January 28th 13, 03:55 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Bill Wright[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,437
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?

David Woolley wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:

For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use
Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible.
Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones
etc are pretty well gone.
If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked
'essential' as that is on a special circuit.


In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing.

The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at least
one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has to be
subject to a free PAT test, first.

My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded.

Bill
  #13  
Old January 28th 13, 04:20 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Dr Zoidberg[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 77
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?


"the dog from that film you saw" wrote in
message ...
On 28/01/2013 07:45, Dr Zoidberg wrote:

An iPad will do the job very nicely, but it sounds like you'd want the
64gb version if you plan on filling it with video which isn't cheap.
It's a brilliant bit of kit IMO, but something like a Samsung Galaxy Tab
has a Micro SD card slot so that will be a lot cheaper - half the price.




the ipad would need all the mkv videos etc converting to something it
likes wouldn't it?

Nope, AVPlayerHD is one of a number of apps that will play pretty much any
video file. I've not needed to convert anything on mine. You can upload
files either through a HTTPS session or syncing them through iTunes.


--
Alex

  #14  
Old January 28th 13, 04:22 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Ian Jackson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,974
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?

In message , Bill Wright
writes
David Woolley wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:

For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use
Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible.
Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones
etc are pretty well gone.
If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked
'essential' as that is on a special circuit.

In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing.
The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at
least one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has
to be subject to a free PAT test, first.

My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded.

How many times do 'normal' things (computers, phones, TV sets etc)
actually fail a PAT test?
--
Ian
  #15  
Old January 28th 13, 04:35 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,383
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?

In article ,
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Bill Wright
writes
David Woolley wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:

For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use
Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible.
Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones
etc are pretty well gone.
If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked
'essential' as that is on a special circuit.
In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing.
The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at
least one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has
to be subject to a free PAT test, first.

My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded.

How many times do 'normal' things (computers, phones, TV sets etc)
actually fail a PAT test?


usually only if the flex is damaged. Moulded on plugs have eliminated a
lot of potential failures.

--
From KT24

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18

  #16  
Old January 28th 13, 04:48 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Ian Jackson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,974
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?

In message , charles
writes
In article ,
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Bill Wright
writes
David Woolley wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:

For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use
Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible.
Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones
etc are pretty well gone.
If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked
'essential' as that is on a special circuit.
In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing.
The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at
least one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has
to be subject to a free PAT test, first.
My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded.

How many times do 'normal' things (computers, phones, TV sets etc)
actually fail a PAT test?


usually only if the flex is damaged. Moulded on plugs have eliminated a
lot of potential failures.

And a quick visual inspection would virtually eliminate all of those?
--
Ian
  #17  
Old January 28th 13, 05:21 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,383
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?

In article , Ian Jackson
wrote:
In message , charles
writes
In article , Ian Jackson
wrote:
In message , Bill Wright
writes
David Woolley wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:

For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use
Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible. Most/all
hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones etc are
pretty well gone. If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket,
not one marked 'essential' as that is on a special circuit.
In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing. The NHS now
outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at least one of
those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has to be
subject to a free PAT test, first.
My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded.

How many times do 'normal' things (computers, phones, TV sets etc)
actually fail a PAT test?


usually only if the flex is damaged. Moulded on plugs have eliminated a
lot of potential failures.

And a quick visual inspection would virtually eliminate all of those?


certainly the ones where the outer sheath doesn't reach the cord grip.

--
From KT24

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18

  #19  
Old January 28th 13, 06:23 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Dave Saville[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:35:20 UTC, charles
wrote:

usually only if the flex is damaged. Moulded on plugs have eliminated a
lot of potential failures.



Many many years before PAT tests we routinely cut off molded plugs and
fitited new MK ones - because all plugs had to be fitted by the
company electrician.........
--
Regards
Dave Saville
  #20  
Old January 28th 13, 07:36 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Paul Ratcliffe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,371
Default OT[?]: Video player for hospital?

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:23:13 +0000 (UTC), Dave Saville
wrote:

Many many years before PAT tests we routinely cut off molded plugs and
fitited new MK ones - because all plugs had to be fitted by the
company electrician.........


Now we do the exact opposite.
If it hasn't got a moulded plug it's almost certainly going to
get replaced with a lead that has.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
more hospital curiosities Tim UK digital tv 79 April 5th 12 05:32 PM
hospital TV Bill Wright[_2_] UK digital tv 52 March 27th 12 10:32 PM
Why Connect Video Out From DVD Player To Video In On An A/V Receiver..? justin david Home theater (general) 2 February 19th 07 07:18 PM
General Hospital Feed [email protected] Satellite tvro 1 September 7th 06 02:53 PM
kingdom hospital wildfeed catpackrat Satellite tvro 0 March 24th 04 05:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.