![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:57:37 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme
wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:42:46 +0100, "Max Demian" wrote: Is it true that in the early days of colour TV you had to call an engineer in to degauss your set if you moved it to a different part of the room? I was a TV engineer when colour TV started and I can't remember ever having to degauss a set when it had been moved. Sometimes a set needed degaussing after installation but that wasn't very common. Most sets were not shaken up too much in the delivery van and the coils usually stayed in place. Steve I blame "Ask" Aspel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAycu4g4qnM In practice installing a new colour set was largely a plug & play affair, even the early dual standard ones. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Brian Gaff
scribeth thus I notice that most tvs these days have really awful sound, toppy and brash. Its a tradition for tvs to be the poor relation of the home entertainment devices, and I suppose one is supposed to plug it into a surround system or whatever to make it worth while. Are there any reasonably priced tvs that do not sound like a bucket of bolts rattling in a plastic tuppaware box? Brian Problem is the cabinet size of the new flat panels. We have a SONY TV, lovely pix but ****e sound which we expected. Fine the TV sound thru the external amp and Quad ESL's and in my office workshop fine off the TV card in the PC and the LS3/5A's ![]() In fact excellent sometimes and quite surprising just how good it can be ..-- Tony Sayer |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 14/07/2012 14:08, Brian Gaff wrote:
I notice that most tvs these days have really awful sound, toppy and brash. Its a tradition for tvs to be the poor relation of the home entertainment devices, and I suppose one is supposed to plug it into a surround system or whatever to make it worth while. Are there any reasonably priced tvs that do not sound like a bucket of bolts rattling in a plastic tuppaware box? I don't know - but I've scanned the Wich reviews from time to time. This is from their top reviewed TV, the £1800 UE55D8000: --- Sound, as ever with super-slim flat-panel TVs, fails to live up to the brilliant picture performance. But the D8000 isn't a disaster, and is a world away from Samsung's first wave of LED TVs a couple of years back. The audio certainly has plenty of energy compared with many slim-line TVs, manages a semblance of bass and delivers a fair stereo effect. Yet the harsh high frequencies help deliver an overall effect that's soulless and synthetic. The good news is that you can improve audio by connecting to a surround-sound system. It's missing the red and white phono outputs to connect to an older hi-fi, but stereo signals are routed via the Scart, so a simple Scart-to-phono adaptor (about £10) will do the trick. --- So I'd guess the answer is 'no'. Which is a shame - you'd think there's a reputation to be made. I have a JBL dock thing for my phone and the sound is quite reasonable - fills a room anyway with an attempt at bass. The 'drivers' are about 1cm, which suggests that it can be done. Rob |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 15/07/2012 11:52, Jim Lesurf wrote:
From the POV of manufacturers and retailers I suspect there are two main reasons why they generally don't do that. 1) It is a tacit admission that their 'fashionable' flat panel TVs can't provide decent sound without a lot of help. (Which might make people start asking why they've been flogging them for so long already!) 2) That it may deter innocent purchasers who see it in the shop beside sets that don't "need more boxes", and are probably cheaper because the makers haven't bothered. So a mix of 'wife acceptance factor', cost, etc. I guess they may also be happy in the shop to then sell you 'add ons' like speakers, amp, etc. The basic idea, of course, is that consumer goods are made to be*sold*, not to be*used*. In theory a flat panel display could be combined with an ESL or DML. But they'd then have to sell something that "looks like the other panels, but costs a lot more". So even if the makers are confident they could develop one, it runs into rules 1 and 2... When I bought my TV I tried to buy just a panel. Nothing else. Because I knew I'd soon be buying a PVR (done) and external sound system (not yet) so I didn't need anything else in the TV. Couldn't find one. So now I'm looking for a low-power ethernet hub to network them both, even though the TV network won't really add anything the PVR can't do but /she/ has become used to it! Andy |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 14/07/2012 14:08, Brian Gaff wrote:
I notice that most tvs these days have really awful sound, toppy and brash. Its a tradition for tvs to be the poor relation of the home entertainment devices, and I suppose one is supposed to plug it into a surround system or whatever to make it worth while. Are there any reasonably priced tvs that do not sound like a bucket of bolts rattling in a plastic tuppaware box? Brian NXT now called Hiwave Technology make a range of flat Surfacesound speakers. Surely some have been used on TV's. They have been used on phones and laptops. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distrib...de_loudspeaker. Derek |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Andy Champ wrote: hen I bought my TV I tried to buy just a panel. Nothing else. Because I knew I'd soon be buying a PVR (done) and external sound system (not yet) so I didn't need anything else in the TV. Philips once sort of attempted this with their early Matchline system. But tried to charge a premium for leaving bits out. 'Twas ever thus... -- *Can vegetarians eat animal crackers? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Graham." wrote in message
... On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:57:37 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:42:46 +0100, "Max Demian" wrote: Is it true that in the early days of colour TV you had to call an engineer in to degauss your set if you moved it to a different part of the room? I was a TV engineer when colour TV started and I can't remember ever having to degauss a set when it had been moved. Sometimes a set needed degaussing after installation but that wasn't very common. Most sets were not shaken up too much in the delivery van and the coils usually stayed in place. I blame "Ask" Aspel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAycu4g4qnM In practice installing a new colour set was largely a plug & play affair, even the early dual standard ones. If that's an example of the quality, I'm sticking to black and white. -- Max Demian |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Stephen
Wolstenholme wrote A problem using external speakers with small TVs is the apparent misdirection of the sound relative to the picture. The best place for speakers is just under the screen or a balanced pair, one on either side of the screen. I find using separate hifi or surround sound systems distracts from the picture. I like the sound to come from the same direction as the screen. That's why a proper surround sound system has a centre front speaker. Even without a centre front speaker decent AV amps will use the front left/right speakers to project any centre front (speech) encoding from the centre. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Alan wrote:
A problem using external speakers with small TVs is the apparent misdirection of the sound relative to the picture. The best place for speakers is just under the screen or a balanced pair, one on either side of the screen. I find using separate hifi or surround sound systems distracts from the picture. I like the sound to come from the same direction as the screen. That's why a proper surround sound system has a centre front speaker. Even without a centre front speaker decent AV amps will use the front left/right speakers to project any centre front (speech) encoding from the centre. Many years ago in (the now, sadly, doomed) Television Centre, the maintenance area for Studios 6, 7 and 8 had a separate room for fixing and testing monitors. There would nearly always be a working one, ready to go if needed, showing a picture, and there was a loudspeaker unit on top of a shelf on the opposite side of the room. I was quite surprised how easy it was to get used to this. I suppose if you see a person's lips move and hear a synchronised voice, even if the voice comes from behind your own head, the brain makes the mental adjustment that is necessary to enable this scenario to make sense. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Alan wrote: That's why a proper surround sound system has a centre front speaker. Even without a centre front speaker decent AV amps will use the front left/right speakers to project any centre front (speech) encoding from the centre. Which will mess up the balance as determined when the prog was dubbed. -- *Sleep with a photographer and watch things develop Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low sound, no sound, unplug cable box | JRStern | High definition TV | 0 | December 20th 08 04:57 PM |
| Sound through the HDTV cable dvr box or buy a seperate sound system??? | Steve | High definition TV | 4 | January 14th 06 04:36 AM |
| Q? dvr sound to Yamaha sound processor | Bob_M | Home theater (general) | 0 | November 12th 05 11:53 PM |
| Channel sound on sound | Martin Elliff | UK digital tv | 4 | December 7th 04 08:25 PM |
| Sound calibration, do I need a sound level meter? | Grand Inquisitor | Home theater (general) | 13 | November 6th 03 09:48 PM |