![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could anyone help with a question about the quality of aerial cables?
I'm in Doncaster using the Emley Moor transmitter and some of the Freeview channels are only showing a signal strength of about 60% on my Topfield Freeview box, and frequently suffer picture breakups. I can understand that oxygen free copper audio cables make a difference to the quality of an audio interconnect cable, but is there any need to buy an OFC aerial cable with gold connectors instead of the standard cable supplied with a Freeview box? Will it be less lossy than a standard cable? Thanks, JP |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , JP
writes Could anyone help with a question about the quality of aerial cables? I'm in Doncaster using the Emley Moor transmitter and some of the Freeview channels are only showing a signal strength of about 60% on my Topfield Freeview box, and frequently suffer picture breakups. I can understand that oxygen free copper audio cables make a difference to the quality of an audio interconnect cable, but is there any need to buy an OFC aerial cable with gold connectors instead of the standard cable supplied with a Freeview box? Will it be less lossy than a standard cable? Thanks, JP Plonk (er) Powell again. -- Ian |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ian" wrote in message ... In message , JP writes Could anyone help with a question about the quality of aerial cables? I'm in Doncaster using the Emley Moor transmitter and some of the Freeview channels are only showing a signal strength of about 60% on my Topfield Freeview box, and frequently suffer picture breakups. I can understand that oxygen free copper audio cables make a difference to the quality of an audio interconnect cable, but is there any need to buy an OFC aerial cable with gold connectors instead of the standard cable supplied with a Freeview box? Will it be less lossy than a standard cable? Thanks, JP Plonk (er) Powell again. -- Ian I don't think it's Jamie, but if he tries to sit next to me I'm going to stand in the buffet car. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , JP
wrote Could anyone help with a question about the quality of aerial cables? http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/article...-quality.shtml I'm in Doncaster using the Emley Moor transmitter and some of the Freeview channels are only showing a signal strength of about 60% on my Topfield Freeview box, and frequently suffer picture breakups. A signal strength of 60% should be more than OK - it's the quality figure that matters on a Topfield Install the signal Monitor TAP on your Topfield and you will get a lot of information about your signals. http://www.tapworld.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=318 See also http://forum.toppy.org.uk/forum/index.php -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Ian
wrote Plonk (er) Powell again. If it is then recommend the V20 coax cable from Russ Andrews at only £13 metre. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
JP wrote: I can understand that oxygen free copper audio cables make a difference to the quality of an audio interconnect cable, but is there any need to buy an OFC aerial cable with gold connectors instead of the standard cable supplied with a Freeview box? That would be what percentage, length wise, of the feeder from aerial to set? -- *Many hamsters only blink one eye at a time * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Brian Gaff
wrote Are you winding us up? Audio cables, oxygen free or whatever black magic they claim, is a load of claptrap most of the time. Its the good connections either end that matter and not having coiled up leads. With RF on the other hand, there will always be losses, since you do not actually say what is fitted now, it would be hard to judge if the cable is the problem. From memory Topfield supply a 3 inch connecting lead to join tuner 1 to tuner 2. While not the best quality in the world it is far from the worst. It is 100% screened, with a silver metallic foil. With a Topfield 5800 or 5810 there are various third party software applications (TAPs) that can be loaded on to the box to help diagnose the problem. For instance there is a TAP that will display the signal strength and quality with the minimum, typical and maximum values for a configurable sample period being reported for all MUXs and both tuners on a single screen. Not ruling out a poor aerial installation and cable not able to cope with local electrical interference, a common cause of poor reception on the Toppy is to do with duplicate channels from multiple transmitters and the user deleting the wrong one. Again, there are TAPs that can be installed to only scan from one selected transmitter or to delete only the weakest of the duplicates. Depending on when the box was purchased and/or if the user has updated the firmware from a UK source there may also be problems with the "Split NIT" http://www.toppy.org.uk/static/channelNumbers.shtml. Updating from the Korean site is not recommended as those firmware versions do not include some vital bug fixes that the UK distributor has included in the boxes they have shipped in the last year or so. The http://www.toppy.org.uk/ site has firmware versions with many more bug fixes. All the bug fixes, those used on the Toppy.org site and those used by the UK distributor, have all been written and tested by customers. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , JP wrote: I can understand that oxygen free copper audio cables make a difference to the quality of an audio interconnect cable, but is there any need to buy an OFC aerial cable with gold connectors instead of the standard cable supplied with a Freeview box? That would be what percentage, length wise, of the feeder from aerial to set? -- *Many hamsters only blink one eye at a time * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. I don't think I have ever seen an aerial patch-cable supplied with an STB (using the term loosely to include VCRs and DVDRs here). Often there will be a male-female "RF cable" intended to couple the RF modulator and/or loopthrough signals to a downstream tuner. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Graham. wrote: I don't think I have ever seen an aerial patch-cable supplied with an STB (using the term loosely to include VCRs and DVDRs here). Often there will be a male-female "RF cable" intended to couple the RF modulator and/or loopthrough signals to a downstream tuner. Aerial wall outlets are often male these days, so you can use that supplied lead. Have a look in a DIY store if you doubt me. Wickes sell them. -- *OK, who stopped payment on my reality check? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JP" wrote in message news ![]() Could anyone help with a question about the quality of aerial cables? I'm in Doncaster using the Emley Moor transmitter and some of the Freeview channels are only showing a signal strength of about 60% on my Topfield Freeview box, and frequently suffer picture breakups. I can understand that oxygen free copper audio cables make a difference to the quality of an audio interconnect cable, but is there any need to buy an OFC aerial cable with gold connectors instead of the standard cable supplied with a Freeview box? Will it be less lossy than a standard cable? Thanks, JP OFC - all bunkum. Two main factors may be affecting your aerial run: - 1. Loss, especially if the run is long. 2. Noise. Use satellite TV cable (e.g. CT100) to cure the latter, this has braid and foil that keeps out interference. It also has a better frequency response. If the run is long then upgrade to [thicker] CT125 or even CT167. Gold connectors is only relevant for professional use where the connections are constantly made and broken - e.g. like on my £££ Sony microphone. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do i need the "high quality" hdmi cables ? | Psalm Nuclei | High definition TV | 22 | December 5th 07 04:13 AM |
| Reasonable quality Scart cables? | Dr Zoidberg | UK home cinema | 2 | March 9th 05 12:13 AM |
| High Quality TV Coax Cables | Dee | UK digital tv | 24 | February 15th 04 12:48 AM |
| High Quality TV Coax Cables | Dee | UK digital tv | 0 | January 15th 04 10:53 PM |
| component cables priced too high | magnulus | High definition TV | 19 | November 30th 03 12:10 AM |