A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » UK digital tv
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Poor reception at new address



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old February 21st 11, 03:23 AM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Steve Terry[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Poor reception at new address

Scott wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:34:17 -0000, "Graham." wrote:
[snip]

Oh, and there is no such thing as a digital aerial.


Of course there is. I've got one. Mine has the optional HD upgrade
which lets me get the HD channels as well :-)


Me too, i got mine at Dixons where a highly trained young man
told me all about my need for one, i presume you got yours there too?

Steve Terry
--
Get a free GiffGaff PAYG Sim and £5 bonus after activation at:
http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/g4wwk


  #32  
Old February 21st 11, 08:44 AM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,383
Default Poor reception at new address

In article ,
Bill Wright wrote:
Java Jive wrote:
You seem to be forgetting that transmitter sites are chosen
deliberately to give suitable coverage, which implies that they are
chosen to minimise ground obstructions into the fresnel zone, which is
why most of them are at high elevations compared with the area they
are expected to cover.


'Minimise' is the word. Every coverage area has a fringe area.


sometimes these are not at the outer limit.

Bill


--
From KT24

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16

  #33  
Old February 21st 11, 09:29 AM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
PeterC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 868
Default Poor reception at new address

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:23:24 -0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Me too, i got mine at Dixons where a highly trained young man


He'd done up his flies?
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway
  #34  
Old February 21st 11, 12:00 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
Bill Wright[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,437
Default Poor reception at new address

charles wrote:
In article ,
Bill Wright wrote:
Java Jive wrote:
You seem to be forgetting that transmitter sites are chosen
deliberately to give suitable coverage, which implies that they are
chosen to minimise ground obstructions into the fresnel zone, which is
why most of them are at high elevations compared with the area they
are expected to cover.


'Minimise' is the word. Every coverage area has a fringe area.


sometimes these are not at the outer limit.

Bill


Based on ecclesiastical practice I wonder if an area where best
reception is from a distant transmitter, despite being surrounded by
areas where best reception is from the more local transmitter, should be
called a 'peculier'.

Bill
  #35  
Old February 21st 11, 04:10 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
ian field
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,092
Default Poor reception at new address


"PeterC" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:23:24 -0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Me too, i got mine at Dixons where a highly trained young man


He'd done up his flies?



...................without catching his nob in the zip!


  #36  
Old February 21st 11, 06:10 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
PeterC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 868
Default Poor reception at new address

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:10:07 -0000, Ian Field wrote:

"PeterC" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:23:24 -0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Me too, i got mine at Dixons where a highly trained young man


He'd done up his flies?


..................without catching his nob in the zip!


Would he notice?
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway
  #37  
Old February 21st 11, 08:09 PM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
ian field
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,092
Default Poor reception at new address


"PeterC" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:10:07 -0000, Ian Field wrote:

"PeterC" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:23:24 -0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Me too, i got mine at Dixons where a highly trained young man

He'd done up his flies?


..................without catching his nob in the zip!


Would he notice?



Depends how stoned he is.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Some HD Reception Poor? Richard Cranium High definition TV 9 April 11th 08 08:26 PM
Poor reception Q's Daytona UK digital tv 11 October 10th 07 01:17 PM
poor reception but - only of ITV ! Martin UK sky 3 August 2nd 05 08:19 AM
Poor SKY reception again John Russell UK digital tv 0 February 7th 05 02:55 PM
poor reception with tvlink Jim UK digital tv 0 February 2nd 04 11:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.