![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yesterday the communal Aerial man came because I had complained. He checked
the roof aerial and all the connections between including the wall-plate and said all seemed OK. My STB has a signal thingy on it and I showed him that the Muxes beginning 2 i.e. 22 23 28 etc. were 10/10 Strength/Quality whereas the 3's i.e. 32 34 etc. were p**s poor on the Quality side although 10 on the strength side. He went back up and said he had tweaked and it should be better - yes, look that's a decent picture you are getting. Anyway, today I unplugged from the wall-plate and plugged into my own small aerial used for the spare room. Shock. All the muxes showed 10/10. I phoned him back and he said he would get back again tomorrow if possible. What on earth is going on??? Crystal Palace direct un-obscured line of sight. TIA John the West Ham fan |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"housetrained" wrote in message ... Yesterday the communal Aerial man came because I had complained. He checked the roof aerial and all the connections between including the wall-plate and said all seemed OK. My STB has a signal thingy on it and I showed him that the Muxes beginning 2 i.e. 22 23 28 etc. were 10/10 Strength/Quality whereas the 3's i.e. 32 34 etc. were p**s poor on the Quality side although 10 on the strength side. He went back up and said he had tweaked and it should be better - yes, look that's a decent picture you are getting. Anyway, today I unplugged from the wall-plate and plugged into my own small aerial used for the spare room. Shock. All the muxes showed 10/10. I phoned him back and he said he would get back again tomorrow if possible. What on earth is going on??? Crystal Palace direct un-obscured line of sight. TIA John the West Ham fan Signal overload or picking up a reflection? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
housetrained wrote:
Yesterday the communal Aerial man came because I had complained. He checked the roof aerial and all the connections between including the wall-plate and said all seemed OK. My STB has a signal thingy on it and I showed him that the Muxes beginning 2 i.e. 22 23 28 etc. were 10/10 Strength/Quality whereas the 3's i.e. 32 34 etc. were p**s poor on the Quality side although 10 on the strength side. He went back up and said he had tweaked and it should be better - yes, look that's a decent picture you are getting. Anyway, today I unplugged from the wall-plate and plugged into my own small aerial used for the spare room. Shock. All the muxes showed 10/10. I phoned him back and he said he would get back again tomorrow if possible. What on earth is going on??? Crystal Palace direct un-obscured line of sight. TIA John the West Ham fan The 'strength' reading can be misleading/irrelevant because (a) The meters in receivers sometimes read max for a moderately poor signal strength. (b) The strength of the signal at your outlet is determined by the sum effect of the amplification and signal losses on the system. If for instance the signals were at a very low level for some reason at some point in the chain and were then enormously amplified you would get a strong but useless signal. It sounds as if either (a) The aerial is crap or the cable is waterlogged, so the installer is increasing amplification, thus amplifying an unrecoverably weak signal (b) There are channel filters fitted which are not passing all the channels due to misalignement (c) The filters are actually meant for the old analogue channels, so the DTT is sneaking past them with varying degrees of success, the resultant low levels being made up by amplification. (d) the system uses channel conversion for analogue and this has not been sorted out for DTT (e) The signal at your outlet is getting there direct, rather than through the system. (f) The system has a ch37 aerial diplexed in for C5 (not unknown in areas where analogue C5 comes from a different tx). I don't understand the significance of: Anyway, today I unplugged from the wall-plate and plugged into my own small aerial used for the spare room. Shock. All the muxes showed 10/10. I phoned him back and he said he would get back again tomorrow if possible. Bill |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
... housetrained wrote: Yesterday the communal Aerial man came because I had complained. He checked the roof aerial and all the connections between including the wall-plate and said all seemed OK. My STB has a signal thingy on it and I showed him that the Muxes beginning 2 i.e. 22 23 28 etc. were 10/10 Strength/Quality whereas the 3's i.e. 32 34 etc. were p**s poor on the Quality side although 10 on the strength side. He went back up and said he had tweaked and it should be better - yes, look that's a decent picture you are getting. Anyway, today I unplugged from the wall-plate and plugged into my own small aerial used for the spare room. Shock. All the muxes showed 10/10. I phoned him back and he said he would get back again tomorrow if possible. What on earth is going on??? Crystal Palace direct un-obscured line of sight. TIA John the West Ham fan The 'strength' reading can be misleading/irrelevant because (a) The meters in receivers sometimes read max for a moderately poor signal strength. (b) The strength of the signal at your outlet is determined by the sum effect of the amplification and signal losses on the system. If for instance the signals were at a very low level for some reason at some point in the chain and were then enormously amplified you would get a strong but useless signal. It sounds as if either (a) The aerial is crap or the cable is waterlogged, so the installer is increasing amplification, thus amplifying an unrecoverably weak signal (b) There are channel filters fitted which are not passing all the channels due to misalignement (c) The filters are actually meant for the old analogue channels, so the DTT is sneaking past them with varying degrees of success, the resultant low levels being made up by amplification. (d) the system uses channel conversion for analogue and this has not been sorted out for DTT (e) The signal at your outlet is getting there direct, rather than through the system. (f) The system has a ch37 aerial diplexed in for C5 (not unknown in areas where analogue C5 comes from a different tx). I don't understand the significance of: Anyway, today I unplugged from the wall-plate and plugged into my own small aerial used for the spare room. Shock. All the muxes showed 10/10. I phoned him back and he said he would get back again tomorrow if possible. Bill You possibly missed on Bill. There is no connection to the aerial system 'up top' and it is just the downlead picking up the signal - albeit cross polarised. Equally the wall-plate could be of the isolating variety and the coupling cap is sc/oc/dj. -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Woody wrote:
It sounds as if either (a) The aerial is crap or the cable is waterlogged, so the installer is increasing amplification, thus amplifying an unrecoverably weak signal (b) There are channel filters fitted which are not passing all the channels due to misalignement (c) The filters are actually meant for the old analogue channels, so the DTT is sneaking past them with varying degrees of success, the resultant low levels being made up by amplification. (d) the system uses channel conversion for analogue and this has not been sorted out for DTT (e) The signal at your outlet is getting there direct, rather than through the system. (f) The system has a ch37 aerial diplexed in for C5 (not unknown in areas where analogue C5 comes from a different tx). You possibly missed on Bill. There is no connection to the aerial system 'up top' and it is just the downlead picking up the signal - albeit cross polarised. Equally the wall-plate could be of the isolating variety and the coupling cap is sc/oc/dj. See my suggestion (e) above. Bill |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Bill | UK digital tv | 0 | March 29th 04 03:53 AM |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Bill | UK digital tv | 0 | March 29th 04 03:53 AM |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Bill | UK digital tv | 0 | March 28th 04 08:58 PM |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Simon | UK digital tv | 0 | March 28th 04 05:35 PM |
| Signal Quality v Signal Strength DIY installation | Simon | UK digital tv | 0 | March 28th 04 05:35 PM |