![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I keep thinking that soon I will try to fit my 30" CRT HDTV into my bedroom
and get a 55-60ish" TV for the living room. Looking at sets in that size range, the good sets, not the brands I have never heard of. It seems the CRT sets are the only ones I can really afford (sub $2000). Can anybody give me advice on this, should I wait for a DLP set to come down in price? Is it a bad move to buy a CRT based RPTV? As you can tell, I need somebody knowledgeable to help me decide on what tech to go with. Price is really important. --Dan |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
dg wrote:
I keep thinking that soon I will try to fit my 30" CRT HDTV into my bedroom and get a 55-60ish" TV for the living room. Looking at sets in that size range, the good sets, not the brands I have never heard of. It seems the CRT sets are the only ones I can really afford (sub $2000). Can anybody give me advice on this, should I wait for a DLP set to come down in price? Is it a bad move to buy a CRT based RPTV? As you can tell, I need somebody knowledgeable to help me decide on what tech to go with. Price is really important. CRT technology is mature. That means that the costs have been wrung out of the manufacturing process. Direct LCD and Plasma both have manufacturing yield problems. It's hard to make that large a piece of glass with that much circuitry perfectly. LCD projectors and DLP have better yields so they are somewhat cheaper to make, though still more expensive than a CRT RPT. CRT technology is capable of better images precisely because it is analog. Newer DLP and LCD projectors are using analog signals to control luma (brightness) so that detail in dark areas can be more accurately be displayed. Most direct LCDs and plasmas use scalars to convert the HDTV geometry to their computer geometry. The downside to CRTs is that geometry and convergence will never be perfect, though it can be very good. If you want an excellent display at a price you can afford, go with CRT RPTV. In 8 to 12 years, when you want to replace it, newer technologies may have matured, or died out. Matthews -- Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game You can't win You can't break even You can't get out of the game |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:41:25 -0500, "Matthew L. Martin"
wrote: dg wrote: I keep thinking that soon I will try to fit my 30" CRT HDTV into my bedroom and get a 55-60ish" TV for the living room. Looking at sets in that size range, the good sets, not the brands I have never heard of. It seems the CRT sets are the only ones I can really afford (sub $2000). Can anybody give me advice on this, should I wait for a DLP set to come down in price? Is it a bad move to buy a CRT based RPTV? As you can tell, I need somebody knowledgeable to help me decide on what tech to go with. Price is really important. CRT technology is mature. That means that the costs have been wrung out of the manufacturing process. Direct LCD and Plasma both have manufacturing yield problems. It's hard to make that large a piece of glass with that much circuitry perfectly. LCD projectors and DLP have better yields so they are somewhat cheaper to make, though still more expensive than a CRT RPT. CRT technology is capable of better images precisely because it is analog. Newer DLP and LCD projectors are using analog signals to control luma (brightness) so that detail in dark areas can be more accurately be displayed. Most direct LCDs and plasmas use scalars to convert the HDTV geometry to their computer geometry. The downside to CRTs is that geometry and convergence will never be perfect, though it can be very good. If you want an excellent display at a price you can afford, go with CRT RPTV. In 8 to 12 years, when you want to replace it, newer technologies may have matured, or died out. Matthews Unfortunately it looks like the really big CRTs are almost extinct. I bought a 65" Hitachi last year but upon a trip to Circuit City the other day the biggest I could find was a 42". Everything else is LCD and DLP. This really sucks for those of us who like really big screens because the equivalent to my Hitachi in LCD is 6-9 grand. 2-3 times as much as a RPT CRT. Thumper To reply drop XYZ in address |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"dg" wrote in message . com... I keep thinking that soon I will try to fit my 30" CRT HDTV into my bedroom and get a 55-60ish" TV for the living room. Looking at sets in that size range, the good sets, not the brands I have never heard of. It seems the CRT sets are the only ones I can really afford (sub $2000). Can anybody give me advice on this, should I wait for a DLP set to come down in price? Is it a bad move to buy a CRT based RPTV? As you can tell, I need somebody knowledgeable to help me decide on what tech to go with. Price is really important. --Dan I was in the same boat but I took a Hitachi 57xwx20b because I got it for 2000.00 from RexTv. This same set listed at over 4000.00 back in 2003 when it came out. I checked and the best price online was 3400.00. I thought it was great in 2003 and now I'm even happier. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Thumper" wrote in message
... Unfortunately it looks like the really big CRTs are almost extinct. I bought a 65" Hitachi last year but upon a trip to Circuit City the other day the biggest I could find was a 42". Everything else is LCD and DLP. This really sucks for those of us who like really big screens because the equivalent to my Hitachi in LCD is 6-9 grand. 2-3 times as much as a RPT CRT. Thumper To reply drop XYZ in address Costco has a 65" for $1999, I can't remember the details but I was looking at its enormous size and thinking that I had read there is a Sony XBR in 70". 65" is plenty big enough for me! I can't wait to get a big ass TV, to think I paid $999 for a 30" CRT only about 4 months ago. --Dan |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
And I've got a "little" Hitachi 46WS500 but also a somewhat "little" living
room; i.e. only about 8 ft. between me and the set. So 46" is just fine thank you! BillR. "Tgs1420" . wrote in message . com... "dg" wrote in message . com... I keep thinking that soon I will try to fit my 30" CRT HDTV into my bedroom and get a 55-60ish" TV for the living room. Looking at sets in that size range, the good sets, not the brands I have never heard of. It seems the CRT sets are the only ones I can really afford (sub $2000). Can anybody give me advice on this, should I wait for a DLP set to come down in price? Is it a bad move to buy a CRT based RPTV? As you can tell, I need somebody knowledgeable to help me decide on what tech to go with. Price is really important. --Dan I was in the same boat but I took a Hitachi 57xwx20b because I got it for 2000.00 from RexTv. This same set listed at over 4000.00 back in 2003 when it came out. I checked and the best price online was 3400.00. I thought it was great in 2003 and now I'm even happier. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
The downside to CRTs is that geometry and convergence will never be perfect, though it can be very good. The other downside is size and weight. If you're planning to dedicate a big chunk of floorspace to your set, then CRT can be a reasonable choice. But if you want to put a large screen on a shelf or on a wall, the newer technologies have some real advantages. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:31:10 GMT, "dg" wrote:
"Thumper" wrote in message .. . Unfortunately it looks like the really big CRTs are almost extinct. I bought a 65" Hitachi last year but upon a trip to Circuit City the other day the biggest I could find was a 42". Everything else is LCD and DLP. This really sucks for those of us who like really big screens because the equivalent to my Hitachi in LCD is 6-9 grand. 2-3 times as much as a RPT CRT. Thumper To reply drop XYZ in address Costco has a 65" for $1999, I can't remember the details but I was looking at its enormous size and thinking that I had read there is a Sony XBR in 70". 65" is plenty big enough for me! I can't wait to get a big ass TV, to think I paid $999 for a 30" CRT only about 4 months ago. --Dan Yeah , they had the Sony set up at Circuit City. Too rich for my blood. I really don't think the picture is better than my Hitachi RPT and the Sony cost a whole lot more. I'm glad I'm not in the market now. I think this will be a setback for people starting with HDTV. Just as the prices came down low enough with CRTs they are switching LCDs and will meet that price resistance all over again. Thumper To reply drop XYZ in address |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:27:07 GMT, "dg" wrote:
I keep thinking that soon I will try to fit my 30" CRT HDTV into my bedroom and get a 55-60ish" TV for the living room. Looking at sets in that size range, the good sets, not the brands I have never heard of. It seems the CRT sets are the only ones I can really afford (sub $2000). Can anybody give me advice on this, should I wait for a DLP set to come down in price? Is it a bad move to buy a CRT based RPTV? As you can tell, I need somebody knowledgeable to help me decide on what tech to go with. Price is really important. I researched HDTV's for about a year. Lots of stuff on the avs forum made me apprehensive about the new HDTV technologies; i.e., DLP's, LCD's, plasmas. Just happened through Best Buy's HDTV section and saw a GE (General Electric) 52" CRT rear projection. The picture was as good as any other in that area; subjectively maybe better. I believe I paid about $897 and I've had it about a month. What a joy! After it was delivered, I noticed it was built by Thompson (RCA), so lots of folks believe that is a troublesome brand. I paid $250 for a 4 year warranty, so the salesman knocked off the $75 delivery fee (I'm 40 miles from the store). The screen has no glare,but it is a somewhat heavy dude. I'm planning on keeping it for about 3 or 4 years (or 'till I die, whatever comes 1st). By then, the other technologies will mature. Incidentally, there isn't that much being transmitted in HDTV, but when it is the picture is absolutely fantastic. Makes SD kinda tough to watch. YMMV |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 21-Nov-2004, E. E. Herbert wrote: After it was delivered, I noticed it was built by Thompson (RCA), so lots of folks believe that is a troublesome brand. Thomson owns both RCA and GE. For several years now the only difference in many models they make is the brand name but one may not notice that since they are usuallly not on display side by sire. -- John in Sun Prairie |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3D TV Beter then HDTV? see for yourself! Cheaper & more exciting! | Michael Cardinale | High definition TV | 0 | March 20th 04 03:18 PM |
| 3D TV Beter then HDTV? see for yourself! Cheaper & more exciting! | Michael Cardinale | High definition TV | 1 | March 13th 04 06:20 PM |
| why so few CRT RPTV's? | magnulus | High definition TV | 25 | December 27th 03 10:17 AM |
| CRT RPTVs are now Obsolete! | Ron Malvern | High definition TV | 95 | December 3rd 03 08:31 AM |
| CRT RPTVs are now Obsolete! | High definition TV | 0 | November 26th 03 07:39 AM | |