![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Receive all Freeview channels fine... (except for times when atmosphere is
weird) - several channels I receive show as pretty high signal strength but their picture quality is somewhat poorer than, for e.g. the BBC channels - suggesting that the issue is one of lack of data not a weak signal. Is this deliberate on part of broadcasters or will the improved signal integrity we are promised with switchover mean they will ramp-up the bandwidth to take advantage of it?... or is this the penalty of squeezing too many channels into an already crowded frequency band and no amount of power uppage at the transmitter will make any damn difference?? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scratchy" wrote in message
... Receive all Freeview channels fine... (except for times when atmosphere is weird) - several channels I receive show as pretty high signal strength but their picture quality is somewhat poorer than, for e.g. the BBC channels - suggesting that the issue is one of lack of data not a weak signal. Is this deliberate on part of broadcasters or will the improved signal integrity we are promised with switchover mean they will ramp-up the bandwidth to take advantage of it?... or is this the penalty of squeezing too many channels into an already crowded frequency band and no amount of power uppage at the transmitter will make any damn difference?? Many channels use a lower bitrate than the BBC does, this is probably what you are seeing. Increasing the power won't affect this but at switchover the capacity of some of the multiplexes it increasing a little so one may see some channels at a higher quality or more likely (judging by what's happened up to now) a few extra channels. -- Brian Gregory. (In the UK) To email me remove the letter vee. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:54:57 -0000, "Scratchy"
wrote: Receive all Freeview channels fine... (except for times when atmosphere is weird) - several channels I receive show as pretty high signal strength but their picture quality is somewhat poorer than, for e.g. the BBC channels - suggesting that the issue is one of lack of data not a weak signal. Is this deliberate on part of broadcasters or will the improved signal integrity we are promised with switchover mean they will ramp-up the bandwidth to take advantage of it?... or is this the penalty of squeezing too many channels into an already crowded frequency band and no amount of power uppage at the transmitter will make any damn difference?? Increasing power will not of itself increase quality if you are already receiving an adequate signal. But in addition you may take it as an article of faith that any increase of available bandwidth for either televison or radio will always be used to cram in extra channels rather than to increase quality. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 24, 11:01*am, "Brian Gaff" wrote:
Well I doubt it, what it will mean I hope is that many borderline areas will be solid in reception terms. *If there was more bandwidth, let us hope that they learn the lessons of dab. What, that some people will stick with what they've got because it's better quality? It'll be a bit late when all the analogue broadcasts are switched off! Freeview can hardly fail. It's free, and they're turning off the only free alternative. (Does Freesat count? Don't know. I don't know a single non-techy who has heard of it!) Cheers, David. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 23, 3:54*pm, "Scratchy" wrote:
Receive all Freeview channels fine... (except for times when atmosphere is weird) - several channels I receive show as pretty high signal strength but their picture quality is somewhat poorer than, for e.g. the BBC channels - suggesting that the issue is one of lack of data not a weak signal. Is this deliberate on part of broadcasters or will the improved signal integrity we are promised with switchover mean they will ramp-up the bandwidth to take advantage of it?... or is this the penalty of squeezing too many channels into an already crowded frequency band and no amount of power uppage at the transmitter will make any damn difference?? Increased power wont upgrade the bit rate. You'll still get a blocky picture but much clearer :/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No channels since switchover | jj[_2_] | UK digital tv | 23 | December 8th 09 11:43 PM |
| DirecTV runs out of bandwidth and drops HD channels | Barnard Peters | High definition TV | 13 | September 21st 06 02:35 AM |
| Will the bitrate ever improve on most of these channels? | Deep Thought | UK digital tv | 16 | January 22nd 06 08:34 PM |
| How many digital channels can you have within the bandwidth of one analogue channel? | John Muir | UK digital tv | 8 | February 20th 04 08:08 PM |
| No audio from lower channels | michael | Home theater (general) | 2 | November 17th 03 08:19 PM |