![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:26:09 +0100, J G Miller wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:41 +0000, Peter Duncanson wrote: For people without technical knowledge that is a perfectly sensible question. Do you not think then that it rather ironic that people will ask if they need a new antenna to be able to receive HD transmissions, but it appears that an awful lot of people think that if they have a TV set which is labeled as "HD Ready" that they will be able to watch HD broadcasts on the Freeview multiplex? It is ironic but understandable. -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , J G Miller wrote:
Do you not think then that it rather ironic that people will ask if they need a new antenna to be able to receive HD transmissions, but it appears that an awful lot of people think that if they have a TV set which is labeled as "HD Ready" that they will be able to watch HD broadcasts on the Freeview multiplex? Not really. The television says it's HD ready, the aerial doesn't. I've seen a lot of headlines recently - probably stirred up by Murdoch - about Freeview HD being "a scam" because you have to buy a decoder, but the real scam is calling a TV "HD ready" when all it means is that the screen is high enough resolution. It's reminiscent of all those TVs that were advertised as "cable ready" just because they had 100 channel numbers, which was entirely useless. -- Richard -- Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , J G Miller wrote:
What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ![]() Just imagine the gain you could get with a 4D aerial! -- Richard -- Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:39:37 +0000, Richard Tobin wrote:
Just imagine the gain you could get with a 4D aerial! Good point. Would one even be able to watch TV shows before they were scheduled? ![]() However, at the IEEE Explore Digital Library http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/lo...rl=http%3A%2F% 2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4027217%2F4027218%2 F04027381.pdf%3Farnumber %3D4027381&authDecision=-203 QUOTE The Four Dimensional Linear Antenna Arrays Shiwen Yang; Zaiping Nie Environmental Electromagnetics, The 2006 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Volume , Issue , 1-4 Aug. 2006 Page(s):692 - 695 Digital Object Identifier Â* 10.1109/CEEM.2006.258049 Summary: This paper presents the review of the study on four dimensional (4D) antenna arrays, a type of antenna arrays which introduce a fourth dimension time - into conventional antenna arrays. The analytical theory and some numerical simulation results on their applications are presented UNQUOTE which is cited in the paper SIMULATION OF TIME MODULATED LINEAR ANTENNA ARRAYS USING THE FDTD METHOD by S. Yang, Y. Chen, and Z.-P. Nie Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 98, 175-190, 2009. available at http://ceta.mit.EDU/pier/pier98/10.09092507.pdf |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
"brightside S9" wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:41 +0000, Peter Duncanson wrote: Oh, yes. It must be on a 3D mast, held by 3D brackets, with a 3D coax downlead (twin coax, one centre for each eye). There will ned to be three brackets, named, i, j and k. No you only need i-h and k-h the third bracket is formed by a matrix. In America the top bracket is thinner of course. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter Duncanson" wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:02:30 +0000, Glenn Millar wrote: On 20/01/2010 15:50, J G Miller wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:56 +0000, Steve Terry wrote: Using digital coax of course What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ![]() Probably... http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp157.shtml Interesting. I wonder whether they have considered moving the polarisation planes through 45 degrees: x rather then +. There was a discussion on here or, utb a year or two ago about a proposed DTT system that required receiving aerials of H and V polerasations from the same transmitter, some sort of diversity IIRC. I suppose if the idea took off the manufactures would make x/y TV aerials with separate downleads. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
I suspect they won't fall foul of Part P as they appear to have just buried the flex in the wall with a 13amp plug top at the end! As "experts" though, they would certainly be liable should anyone drill into that cable as it certainly doesn't adhere to any safe practice of burying cables that I'm aware of. Because the cable is fixed I think it will come under Part P. If I run a cable to the garage fixed to the fence and into some sockets fixed to the garage wall but put a 13A plug on the house end - that still comes under Part P. If it's not a new circuit, not involving a delve inside the CU and not involving a special area (kitchen, bathroom or remote building) it won't invoke part P. Sockets in a remote garage certainly invoke Part P, a socket fixed the the outside wall of your house spurred off a socket inside wouldn't. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Doctor D wrote:
"Ashley Booth" wrote in message ... Doctor D wrote: Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk (click on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the plaster from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size obviously does fit all! See if you can spot it: http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml Cheers D I wonder if they are Part-P registered. If so they should know about safe zones. -- Ashley For Windsor Weather see www.snglinks.com/wx I suspect they won't fall foul of Part P as they appear to have just buried the flex in the wall with a 13amp plug top at the end! As "experts" though, they would certainly be liable should anyone drill into that cable as it certainly doesn't adhere to any safe practice of burying cables that I'm aware of. Because the cable is fixed I think it will come under Part P. If I run a cable to the garage fixed to the fence and into some sockets fixed to the garage wall but put a 13A plug on the house end - that still comes under Part P. -- Ashley For Windsor Weather see www.snglinks.com/wx |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bill's got a second job? | Adrian[_3_] | UK digital tv | 36 | November 29th 09 11:25 PM |
| Bill's Website | John Porcella | UK digital tv | 37 | January 11th 05 12:21 AM |
| STEALING IS FUN! | Nikko | Tivo personal television | 13 | July 23rd 04 05:56 AM |
| Bill's website | Bill | UK digital tv | 2 | November 23rd 03 11:54 AM |
| Bill's website | Bill | UK digital tv | 0 | November 23rd 03 02:05 AM |