![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than
LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. Vietnam Vet 82 Abn.Div. 1969 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Vet" wrote:
I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. Vietnam Vet 82 Abn.Div. 1969 They are both LCD sets. LED is a later version of backliting. Personally I'd go for the LED if the price difference isn't too great.. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:25:57 +1300, Mutley
wrote: "Vet" wrote: I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. Vietnam Vet 82 Abn.Div. 1969 They are both LCD sets. LED is a later version of backliting. Personally I'd go for the LED if the price difference isn't too great.. LCD panel with LED backlight exist in several versions depending on what characteristic the designer is trying to improve. "Standard" LCD TV use backlight of type CCFL. The most basic versions use a fixed setting for the amount of backlight it uses. That is not good because the ability to block the light by the LCD pixels is somewhat limited. Therefore it is better to have control over the amount of light so that the brightness (depending on your room lighting) is not unessisarily bright. This is then a static setting to adapt to your room and will provide better blacks (instead of greish or blueish "black") and also better shadow details. Next step is to include a dynamic regulation of the backlight, the whole screen at the same time, depending on the picture content. If done too agressively you will notice and be irritated, but if done subtle it will improve the subjective maximum contrast. This is where one version of LED backlight comes in. LED backlight with local dimming controls the backlight for a local area (but not individual pixels) with the aim to create even higher subjective maximum contrast. Some possible drawbacks exist with a noticable gloria around sharp bright objects like text etc. Another version of LED backlight focus on building very thin panels. These do not use local dimming. A possible drawback can be (worse) uneven backlighting. Also the colour of these LED:s can vary between models (as is true also for CCFL models). The sensitivity for side angle viewing can also vary (as CCFL). As always, you need to judge the complete picture (with various types of material) to make the best trade-off. The update frequency (60/120/240 or in Europe 50/100/200) when talking about LCD involves motion interpolation between frames and affects the characteristics for motion, both in film material (24/25Hz content) and broadcast material (60/50Hz interlaced content). Compare and look for smoother and/or sharper motion of bright objects. If the motion interpolation is too agressive, artifacts around moving contours can be irritating. /Jan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Vet" wrote in message ... I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. the LED sets are in fact lcds as well - it's just that instead of using flourescent tubes to light the screen they use LEDs. in theory they can be better - they can illuminate only the parts of the screen that need it. leaving the black bits as black instead of dark grey, but some don't do that so your only gain is in power saving. true LED sets - OLEDs - organic leds, are still some way off - you'll pay 11 thousand dollars for a 10 inch set that isnt even HD. the LED backlit sets cost more so you need to see both in action to decide if you want to pay the extra. -- Gareth. that fly...... is your magic wand.... http://dsbdsb.mybrute.com you fight better when you have a bear! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vet wrote:
I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. Vietnam Vet 82 Abn.Div. 1969 While you'll get some useful info here, there are websites that are educational, such as CNET and consumer reports. -- john mcwilliams |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jan B" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:25:57 +1300, Mutley wrote: "Vet" wrote: I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. Vietnam Vet 82 Abn.Div. 1969 They are both LCD sets. LED is a later version of backliting. Personally I'd go for the LED if the price difference isn't too great.. LCD panel with LED backlight exist in several versions depending on what characteristic the designer is trying to improve. "Standard" LCD TV use backlight of type CCFL. The most basic versions use a fixed setting for the amount of backlight it uses. That is not good because the ability to block the light by the LCD pixels is somewhat limited. Therefore it is better to have control over the amount of light so that the brightness (depending on your room lighting) is not unessisarily bright. This is then a static setting to adapt to your room and will provide better blacks (instead of greish or blueish "black") and also better shadow details. Next step is to include a dynamic regulation of the backlight, the whole screen at the same time, depending on the picture content. If done too agressively you will notice and be irritated, but if done subtle it will improve the subjective maximum contrast. This is where one version of LED backlight comes in. LED backlight with local dimming controls the backlight for a local area (but not individual pixels) with the aim to create even higher subjective maximum contrast. Some possible drawbacks exist with a noticable gloria around sharp bright objects like text etc. Another version of LED backlight focus on building very thin panels. These do not use local dimming. A possible drawback can be (worse) uneven backlighting. Also the colour of these LED:s can vary between models (as is true also for CCFL models). The sensitivity for side angle viewing can also vary (as CCFL). As always, you need to judge the complete picture (with various types of material) to make the best trade-off. The update frequency (60/120/240 or in Europe 50/100/200) when talking about LCD involves motion interpolation between frames and affects the characteristics for motion, both in film material (24/25Hz content) and broadcast material (60/50Hz interlaced content). Compare and look for smoother and/or sharper motion of bright objects. If the motion interpolation is too agressive, artifacts around moving contours can be irritating. /Jan Hey, Jan - - really nice coverage of the range of backlighting from CCFL to local dimming! Thanks for taking the trouble to be logical and thorough - - very helpful. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
The dog from that film you saw wrote:
"Vet" wrote in message ... I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. the LED sets are in fact lcds as well - it's just that instead of using flourescent tubes to light the screen they use LEDs. in theory they can be better - they can illuminate only the parts of the screen that need it. leaving the black bits as black instead of dark grey, but some don't do that so your only gain is in power saving. true LED sets - OLEDs - organic leds, are still some way off - you'll pay 11 thousand dollars for a 10 inch set that isnt even HD. the LED backlit sets cost more so you need to see both in action to decide if you want to pay the extra. CCFL last 5-10 yrs; LED backlit will work 'forever' ... even if something goes, it might just be a single pixel backlight, or in the worse case a row (or column or a block) but if the Hi-V for the CCFL goes you have an all black screen. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
RickMerrill wrote:
The dog from that film you saw wrote: "Vet" wrote in message ... I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. the LED sets are in fact lcds as well - it's just that instead of using flourescent tubes to light the screen they use LEDs. in theory they can be better - they can illuminate only the parts of the screen that need it. leaving the black bits as black instead of dark grey, but some don't do that so your only gain is in power saving. true LED sets - OLEDs - organic leds, are still some way off - you'll pay 11 thousand dollars for a 10 inch set that isnt even HD. the LED backlit sets cost more so you need to see both in action to decide if you want to pay the extra. CCFL last 5-10 yrs; LED backlit will work 'forever' ... even if something goes, it might just be a single pixel backlight, or in the worse case a row (or column or a block) but if the Hi-V for the CCFL goes you have an all black screen. I think if the past 20 years are anything to go by and if you've had the set for 10 years it most likely will be replaced as a technology upgrade. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mutley" wrote in message ... CCFL last 5-10 yrs; LED backlit will work 'forever' ... even if something goes, it might just be a single pixel backlight, or in the worse case a row (or column or a block) but if the Hi-V for the CCFL goes you have an all black screen. I think if the past 20 years are anything to go by and if you've had the set for 10 years it most likely will be replaced as a technology upgrade. some of us are such tv freaks we look forward to the time when we ' have ' to get a new tv! -- Gareth. that fly...... is your magic wand.... http://dsbdsb.mybrute.com you fight better when you have a bear! |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mutley wrote:
RickMerrill wrote: The dog from that film you saw wrote: "Vet" wrote in message ... I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. the LED sets are in fact lcds as well - it's just that instead of using flourescent tubes to light the screen they use LEDs. in theory they can be better - they can illuminate only the parts of the screen that need it. leaving the black bits as black instead of dark grey, but some don't do that so your only gain is in power saving. true LED sets - OLEDs - organic leds, are still some way off - you'll pay 11 thousand dollars for a 10 inch set that isnt even HD. the LED backlit sets cost more so you need to see both in action to decide if you want to pay the extra. CCFL last 5-10 yrs; LED backlit will work 'forever' ... even if something goes, it might just be a single pixel backlight, or in the worse case a row (or column or a block) but if the Hi-V for the CCFL goes you have an all black screen. I think if the past 20 years are anything to go by and if you've had the set for 10 years it most likely will be replaced as a technology upgrade. My 30 year old Sony TV is still going strong; most current TV content doesn't merit anything better, anyway. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|