![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ah, well obviously not selling many five year warranties these days then.
I've not heard that this town is particularly bad for lightening strikes. Now if you had been in Wales, I could understand it a bit more. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Andy Cap" wrote in message o.uk... Mike Henry wrote: Please name and shame the shop in question. Comet. Tunbridge Wells |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Java Jive wrote:
IMO *ALL* modern equipment is oversensitive to spikes. There's only so much that a suppressor or some such can do. I suspect that the bog-standard protected 4-ways from the likes of B&Q are likely to be cheaper and just as effective but if you really have got a source of spikes in your home, for example faulty switches or an aging central-heating thermostat, you should get it fixed. That's the best protection of all. Can't say that I've noticed this. There might be RF interference, but I can't remember any mains-borne causing trouble. Maybe I've just been lucky, but then again I don't tend to operate the shredder when the PC in on as they share the same power socket! -- Jeff |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 12, 4:09 am, "Brian Gaff" wrote:
I'd not say anything is worse than anything else in thesurgestakes, but for most purposes I still feel one of those little wire in the plug devices would suffice. Nothing will protect you from the really big one from a lightening strike etc in any case. Those plug-in devices do not even claim to protect from anything destructive. View the numeric specs. No numbers for protection from each type of surge. They are not selling protectors. They are promoting a massive profit margin. A scam that people such as Mike Tomlinson approve of and will post personal attacks to defend. BT routinely suffers even direct lightning strikes with no electronics damage. The technology is well proven. And not found in scams sold in plug-in protectors - ie Monster Cable. A BT Central Office (CO) may suffer about 100 surges with each thunderstorm. When was your town without phone service for four days while they replaced that computer? Key to surge protection is not a protector. The NIST (US government research agency) says what the effective protector must do: You cannot really suppress a surge altogether, nor "arrest" it. What these protective devices do is neither suppress nor arrest a surge, but simply divert it to ground, where it can do no harm. But a protector without that less than 3 meter connection to earth will not provide protection. See spec numbers from Monster Cable which are typical for plug-in protectors. Protection is always about where energy dissipates. Either energy is harmless absorbed in earth - does no damage. Or energy is inside the building hunting for earth destructively via appliances. The Monster Cable even provides more potentially destructive paths for that surge through appliances. A surge current not inside the building is not causing damage. That is why BT suffers direct lightning strikes and no damage. That is what any responsible homeowner does to have any surges - including direct lightning strikes - and no damage. The typical lightning strike is 20,000 amps. Therefore one 'whole house' protector connected short to earth is rated 50,000 amps or better. Keison is one source. Only one protector is needed for everything. That means every appliance is protected for about £1 per appliance. Or spend £100 per appliance for the Monster. Everything must be protected or everything - including that Monster protected TV - is at risk. All appliance contain significant protection. Makes no difference what the screen technology is. But a rare and destructive surge typically occurs once every seven years. A surge that can overwhelm protection inside all appliances is the only reason for surge protection. Responsible homeowners earth one 'whole house' protector so that energy does not seek earth destructively via appliances. So that the surge does not overwhelm protection inside appliances. But again, the protector is not protection. You must do what BT does. You must connect that protector short (ie 'less than 3 meters') to a single point earth ground. Same ground must be used by AC electric, telephone, satellite dish, and cable wire. Otherwise destructive surge energy will enter the building. Surge protection is always about where energy is dissipated. Always. Therefore a protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Monster (and other scam protectors) have no earth ground. Do not claim effective protection. Its few hundred joules cannot absorb surges that are hundred of thousands of joules. So it selling a scam AND does not even claim to protect from destructive surges. Monster Cable and other plug-in protector are obscenely profitable - not effective surge protection. NIST describes Monster and other plug-in protectors: A very important point to keep in mind is that your surge protector will work by diverting the surges to ground. The best surge protection in the world can be useless if grounding is not done properly. Monster Cable and other ineffective protectors have no less than 3 meter connection to earth AND do no even claim that protection in numeric specs. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground – which is why even direct lightning strikes cause no explosions in munitions dumps and why BBC radio and TV equipment suffer direct strikes without damage. The technology is what well proven and that well understood for over 100 years. A still some will reply with insults rather than learn how protection from all surges is routine. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article
, westom wrote: [Snip] A protector is only as effective as its earth ground – which is why even direct lightning strikes cause no explosions in munitions dumps and why BBC radio and TV equipment suffer direct strikes without damage. Actually, there have been a number of well documented cases where severe damage to TV transmitters has occured. The technology is what well proven and that well understood for over 100 years. A still some will reply with insults rather than learn how protection from all surges is routine. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Mike Tomlinson
writes In article , Andy Cap writes Is this sound advice ? Nope. Watch out for w_****, who will be along any moment to lecture you. That was your fault, speak of the devil and he shall appear . . . -- fred BBC3, ITV2/3/4, channels going to the DOGs |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... Ah, well obviously not selling many five year warranties these days then. I've not heard that this town is particularly bad for lightening strikes. Now if you had been in Wales, I could understand it a bit more. Brian Tell me about it! I used to (seemingly) spend half my life in mid Wales replacing masthead amplifiers and PSUs after nearby lightning strikes (and at least one fitted to a field mounted aerial eaten by cattle.) |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
westom wrote:
A still some will reply with insults rather than learn how protection from all surges is routine. Yes, go f**k yourself. -- Adrian C |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , fred writes
That was your fault, speak of the devil and he shall appear . . . Sooorreeee! ![]() But it really was predictable, wasn't it? He has a Google Alert set to tell him when anyone posts re. surges. Sad little ****. -- Mike Tomlinson |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Max Demian" wrote in message
... "Andy Cap" wrote in message o.uk... Got collared to go TV shopping with the sister. Got most of the chat but the last sales pitch was a power suppressor - because flat screens are so much more susceptible than CRTs - at the princely sum of £99! If they are that poor, surely it's time the manufacturers did something about it. Is this sound advice ? Sounds as if people have stopped buying extended warranties. The sort of thing you can get from Maplin for a tenner in any case. Max Demian Got a nice Surgeguard power protector built into a 6 way strip in the last Sainsburys sales for 6quid. Steve Terry -- Get a free Three 3pay Sim with £2 bonus after £10 top up http://freeagent.three.co.uk/stand/view/id/5276 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digiboxes catch fire in power surge | [email protected] | UK digital tv | 50 | March 7th 08 08:28 PM |
| do I need a surge protector? | Jane | High definition TV | 45 | March 3rd 07 03:40 PM |
| Surge Protection | Don Bouchard | Satellite dbs | 18 | January 27th 07 08:02 PM |
| HDTV/DLP Surge Suppressor | Joan and Al | High definition TV | 7 | September 3rd 04 02:21 AM |
| Mits RPTV takes a power surge - how bad can it be? | nickferr | High definition TV | 2 | May 28th 04 03:12 AM |