![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Initially everything appeared to be OK after the retune - no stations
missing. We get our signal from the Lancaster transmitter (Granada area via Winter Hill) Recently I have noticed that Five and ITV1 have intermittent pixilation of the whole picture (I don't mean the break up that occurs due to interference). I checked the signal quality using the TV tuning menu. It seems that all stations carried on the multiplex on Ch 22 (ITV1, ITV2, channel4, More4, E4 and Five) have a lower signal quality than those carried on other multiplexes. Anyone else noticed this or have any comments? The aerial is a new 18 element Group A with new downleads and no splitters. -- John Aldred |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Aldred wrote:
Initially everything appeared to be OK after the retune - no stations missing. We get our signal from the Lancaster transmitter (Granada area via Winter Hill) Recently I have noticed that Five and ITV1 have intermittent pixilation of the whole picture (I don't mean the break up that occurs due to interference). I checked the signal quality using the TV tuning menu. It seems that all stations carried on the multiplex on Ch 22 (ITV1, ITV2, channel4, More4, E4 and Five) have a lower signal quality than those carried on other multiplexes. Anyone else noticed this or have any comments? The aerial is a new 18 element Group A with new downleads and no splitters. I have lost ITV1 completely several times in the last few days. Re-tune the set top boxes and back it comes. We get our signal from Crystal Palace. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:13:44 +0100, John Aldred wrote:
We get our signal from the Lancaster transmitter (Granada area via Winter Hill) .... It seems that all stations carried on the multiplex on Ch 22 Winter Hill does not broadcast a multiplex on channel 22. Are you within range of Lancaster which does broadcast Multiplex 2 (ITV-1 Granada, ITV2, C4, More4) on channel 22? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:13:44 +0100, John Aldred wrote:
The aerial is a new 18 element Group A with new downleads and no splitters. Winter Hill requires a group C/D antenna (or for Winter Hill B something which will go down to Ch40, perhaps only a wideband being suitable). Are you sure you get your signal from Winter Hill and not Lancaster? Are the elements on your antenna oriented horizontally or vertically? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:27:34 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller
wrote: On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:13:44 +0100, John Aldred wrote: We get our signal from the Lancaster transmitter (Granada area via Winter Hill) ... It seems that all stations carried on the multiplex on Ch 22 Winter Hill does not broadcast a multiplex on channel 22. Are you within range of Lancaster which does broadcast Multiplex 2 (ITV-1 Granada, ITV2, C4, More4) on channel 22? John said "We get our signal from the Lancaster transmitter". -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11/10/09 00:27, J G Miller wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:13:44 +0100, John Aldred wrote: We get our signal from the Lancaster transmitter [snip] on Ch 22 Are you within range of Lancaster which does broadcast [snip] on channel 22? Errm? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:30:36 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller
wrote: On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:13:44 +0100, John Aldred wrote: The aerial is a new 18 element Group A with new downleads and no splitters. Winter Hill requires a group C/D antenna (or for Winter Hill B something which will go down to Ch40, perhaps only a wideband being suitable). Are you sure you get your signal from Winter Hill and not Lancaster? Are the elements on your antenna oriented horizontally or vertically? Are you drunk??? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Aldred" wrote in message ... Initially everything appeared to be OK after the retune - no stations missing. We get our signal from the Lancaster transmitter (Granada area via Winter Hill) Recently I have noticed that Five and ITV1 have intermittent pixilation of the whole picture (I don't mean the break up that occurs due to interference). I checked the signal quality using the TV tuning menu. It seems that all stations carried on the multiplex on Ch 22 (ITV1, ITV2, channel4, More4, E4 and Five) have a lower signal quality than those carried on other multiplexes. Anyone else noticed this or have any comments? The aerial is a new 18 element Group A with new downleads and no splitters. I must apologise on behalf of some of my bretheren, who have replied in a fatuous and unhelpful manner. You should not, perhaps, have posted on a Saturday night. As a member of the UK.digital-tv temperance league I will attempt to answer your question in a sober manner. Ch22 is near the end of the band. See http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/article...r-syndrome.pdf There could be other reasons. UHF propagation is, in the real world, intrinsically uneven and unpredictable. Bill |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
... "John Aldred" wrote in message ... Initially everything appeared to be OK after the retune - no stations missing. We get our signal from the Lancaster transmitter (Granada area via Winter Hill) Recently I have noticed that Five and ITV1 have intermittent pixilation of the whole picture (I don't mean the break up that occurs due to interference). I checked the signal quality using the TV tuning menu. It seems that all stations carried on the multiplex on Ch 22 (ITV1, ITV2, channel4, More4, E4 and Five) have a lower signal quality than those carried on other multiplexes. Anyone else noticed this or have any comments? The aerial is a new 18 element Group A with new downleads and no splitters. I must apologise on behalf of some of my bretheren, who have replied in a fatuous and unhelpful manner. You should not, perhaps, have posted on a Saturday night. As a member of the UK.digital-tv temperance league I will attempt to answer your question in a sober manner. Ch22 is near the end of the band. See http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/article...r-syndrome.pdf There could be other reasons. UHF propagation is, in the real world, intrinsically uneven and unpredictable. Bill Oh dear, I fear I may regret this, but I have to disagree with you Bill. We ran links in the 450-470MHz band for decades without problem and entirely predictably. There will however be two major differences which support links to the detriment of TV:- TV aerials have to cover a wider band than a link aerial so will possibly have less gain that is more uneven over the required spectrum. There will be far less fade margin on a TV signal. Links were run at 26dB fade margin, I doubt a TV signal (save where you live BIll!) will have a fraction of that. But UHF propagation is almost entirely predictable. -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| picture quality | Brian Gaff | UK digital tv | 12 | October 14th 08 12:11 PM |
| Better quality picture ? | Postal68 | High definition TV | 10 | April 27th 07 04:24 PM |
| Toshiba Picture Frame CRT's -best picture quality? | Roger R | UK digital tv | 4 | July 24th 05 07:00 PM |
| Picture Quality | Axl | Tivo personal television | 18 | August 18th 04 04:46 PM |
| Picture quality | Simon | UK digital tv | 39 | April 27th 04 01:55 AM |