![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My wife and I will be purchasing a new HDTV set soon. A true "Home Theater
Experience" is not our goal. We have the following priorities (in no particular order). 1) Minimum "muss/fuss" setup. We will be using Time-Warner cable as our primary source. 2) Our TV room is pretty bright (lots of windows, although they do all face north -but still pretty bright). We have to use a glare filter to be able to use our conventional CRT-technology TV in the afternoons. 3) My wife abhors the sound of any kind of 'home theater sound system'. She is somewhat hard of hearing and has some trouble with conventional TV speakers and hearing conversations in all cases. So a TV with a good, built-in sound system is a priority (even though there are FAR better solutions IMHO - she just isn't receptive to them) 4) Our viewing distance is 8-12'. But we are willing to put up with a 37" HDTV set simply because it would fit into our existing TV cabinet (see #1 above) My fundamental questions a 1) I am assuming that, given a very bright room, LCD is the obvious choice (over plasma, etc). Is that right? If there is a priority in the above requirements, this is it. 2) Are there any differences in the base TV audio among the manufacturers. I am guessing no, since Home Theater is the direction here. But there are various "sound level controls" that deals with differences in show vs. commercial volume levels, LG has their "Clear Voice" technology, which (in theory) would be helpful in hearing voice-range frequencies when the 'other frequencies' were all over the map, etc. And maybe some speakers are better than others. It is tough to judge these things in a showroom with tons of ambient noise and no control over what show you are hearing. 3) "LED sets" typically seem to "be LED" in the technology that provides the LCD a backlight. In principle you might get a better "true black" in these cases as you could dim the LED's in that area (assuming a 'large area of black'). But really true blacks is not a priority for us. However the lifetime of the backlight source might well be an issue for us. Is LED backlight lifetimes better than whatever "not LED" LCD sets use? Any comments would be appreciated - thanks. dave |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Lee" wrote in message
m... | My wife and I will be purchasing a new HDTV set soon. A true "Home Theater | Experience" is not our goal. We have the following priorities (in no | particular order). | | 1) Minimum "muss/fuss" setup. We will be using Time-Warner cable as our | primary source. | | 2) Our TV room is pretty bright (lots of windows, although they do all face | north -but still pretty bright). We have to use a glare filter to be able to | use our conventional CRT-technology TV in the afternoons. | | 3) My wife abhors the sound of any kind of 'home theater sound system'. She | is somewhat hard of hearing and has some trouble with conventional TV | speakers and hearing conversations in all cases. So a TV with a good, | built-in sound system is a priority (even though there are FAR better | solutions IMHO - she just isn't receptive to them) | | 4) Our viewing distance is 8-12'. But we are willing to put up with a 37" | HDTV set simply because it would fit into our existing TV cabinet (see #1 | above) | | My fundamental questions a | | 1) I am assuming that, given a very bright room, LCD is the obvious choice | (over plasma, etc). Is that right? If there is a priority in the above | requirements, this is it. | | 2) Are there any differences in the base TV audio among the manufacturers. I | am guessing no, since Home Theater is the direction here. But there are | various "sound level controls" that deals with differences in show vs. | commercial volume levels, LG has their "Clear Voice" technology, which (in | theory) would be helpful in hearing voice-range frequencies when the 'other | frequencies' were all over the map, etc. And maybe some speakers are better | than others. It is tough to judge these things in a showroom with tons of | ambient noise and no control over what show you are hearing. | | 3) "LED sets" typically seem to "be LED" in the technology that provides the | LCD a backlight. In principle you might get a better "true black" in these | cases as you could dim the LED's in that area (assuming a 'large area of | black'). But really true blacks is not a priority for us. However the | lifetime of the backlight source might well be an issue for us. Is LED | backlight lifetimes better than whatever "not LED" LCD sets use? | | Any comments would be appreciated - thanks. | | dave | LCDs are still best for bright rooms. 37" is kinda small for your viewing distance IMHO. It might be worth your while to peruse the Consumer Reports for August and October 2009 at your library for detailed comparisons. They have some info at their website but most is by subscription. As for sound, none are rated "excellent" and the few that are "very good" seem to fall down in some other category. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"iws" wrote in message ... "Dave Lee" wrote in message m... | My wife and I will be purchasing a new HDTV set soon. A true "Home Theater | Experience" is not our goal. We have the following priorities (in no | particular order). | | 1) Minimum "muss/fuss" setup. We will be using Time-Warner cable as our | primary source. | | 2) Our TV room is pretty bright (lots of windows, although they do all face | north -but still pretty bright). We have to use a glare filter to be able to | use our conventional CRT-technology TV in the afternoons. | | 3) My wife abhors the sound of any kind of 'home theater sound system'. She | is somewhat hard of hearing and has some trouble with conventional TV | speakers and hearing conversations in all cases. So a TV with a good, | built-in sound system is a priority (even though there are FAR better | solutions IMHO - she just isn't receptive to them) | | 4) Our viewing distance is 8-12'. But we are willing to put up with a 37" | HDTV set simply because it would fit into our existing TV cabinet (see #1 | above) | | My fundamental questions a | | 1) I am assuming that, given a very bright room, LCD is the obvious choice | (over plasma, etc). Is that right? If there is a priority in the above | requirements, this is it. | | 2) Are there any differences in the base TV audio among the manufacturers. I | am guessing no, since Home Theater is the direction here. But there are | various "sound level controls" that deals with differences in show vs. | commercial volume levels, LG has their "Clear Voice" technology, which (in | theory) would be helpful in hearing voice-range frequencies when the 'other | frequencies' were all over the map, etc. And maybe some speakers are better | than others. It is tough to judge these things in a showroom with tons of | ambient noise and no control over what show you are hearing. | | 3) "LED sets" typically seem to "be LED" in the technology that provides the | LCD a backlight. In principle you might get a better "true black" in these | cases as you could dim the LED's in that area (assuming a 'large area of | black'). But really true blacks is not a priority for us. However the | lifetime of the backlight source might well be an issue for us. Is LED | backlight lifetimes better than whatever "not LED" LCD sets use? | | Any comments would be appreciated - thanks. | | dave | LCDs are still best for bright rooms. 37" is kinda small for your viewing distance IMHO. It might be worth your while to peruse the Consumer Reports for August and October 2009 at your library for detailed comparisons. They have some info at their website but most is by subscription. As for sound, none are rated "excellent" and the few that are "very good" seem to fall down in some other category. The LG ClearVoice works very well by boosting mid range, but not much bass. Very popular among the older crowd. If you find a LCD with analog audio out (good luck!) the sound can be improved greatly by adding a set of 2.1 (w/subwoofer) computer speakers. D |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"iws" wrote in message ... "Dave Lee" wrote in message m... | My wife and I will be purchasing a new HDTV set soon. A true "Home Theater | Experience" is not our goal. We have the following priorities (in no | particular order). | | 1) Minimum "muss/fuss" setup. We will be using Time-Warner cable as our | primary source. | | 2) Our TV room is pretty bright (lots of windows, although they do all face | north -but still pretty bright). We have to use a glare filter to be able to | use our conventional CRT-technology TV in the afternoons. | | 3) My wife abhors the sound of any kind of 'home theater sound system'. She | is somewhat hard of hearing and has some trouble with conventional TV | speakers and hearing conversations in all cases. So a TV with a good, | built-in sound system is a priority (even though there are FAR better | solutions IMHO - she just isn't receptive to them) | | 4) Our viewing distance is 8-12'. But we are willing to put up with a 37" | HDTV set simply because it would fit into our existing TV cabinet (see #1 | above) | | My fundamental questions a | | 1) I am assuming that, given a very bright room, LCD is the obvious choice | (over plasma, etc). Is that right? If there is a priority in the above | requirements, this is it. | | 2) Are there any differences in the base TV audio among the manufacturers. I | am guessing no, since Home Theater is the direction here. But there are | various "sound level controls" that deals with differences in show vs. | commercial volume levels, LG has their "Clear Voice" technology, which (in | theory) would be helpful in hearing voice-range frequencies when the 'other | frequencies' were all over the map, etc. And maybe some speakers are better | than others. It is tough to judge these things in a showroom with tons of | ambient noise and no control over what show you are hearing. | | 3) "LED sets" typically seem to "be LED" in the technology that provides the | LCD a backlight. In principle you might get a better "true black" in these | cases as you could dim the LED's in that area (assuming a 'large area of | black'). But really true blacks is not a priority for us. However the | lifetime of the backlight source might well be an issue for us. Is LED | backlight lifetimes better than whatever "not LED" LCD sets use? | | Any comments would be appreciated - thanks. | | dave | LCDs are still best for bright rooms. 37" is kinda small for your viewing distance IMHO. It might be worth your while to peruse the Consumer Reports for August and October 2009 at your library for detailed comparisons. They have some info at their website but most is by subscription. As for sound, none are rated "excellent" and the few that are "very good" seem to fall down in some other category. Thanks for the feedback. dave |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Deke" wrote in message news ![]() "iws" wrote in message ... "Dave Lee" wrote in message m... | My wife and I will be purchasing a new HDTV set soon. A true "Home Theater | Experience" is not our goal. We have the following priorities (in no | particular order). | | 1) Minimum "muss/fuss" setup. We will be using Time-Warner cable as our | primary source. | | 2) Our TV room is pretty bright (lots of windows, although they do all face | north -but still pretty bright). We have to use a glare filter to be able to | use our conventional CRT-technology TV in the afternoons. | | 3) My wife abhors the sound of any kind of 'home theater sound system'. She | is somewhat hard of hearing and has some trouble with conventional TV | speakers and hearing conversations in all cases. So a TV with a good, | built-in sound system is a priority (even though there are FAR better | solutions IMHO - she just isn't receptive to them) | | 4) Our viewing distance is 8-12'. But we are willing to put up with a 37" | HDTV set simply because it would fit into our existing TV cabinet (see #1 | above) | | My fundamental questions a | | 1) I am assuming that, given a very bright room, LCD is the obvious choice | (over plasma, etc). Is that right? If there is a priority in the above | requirements, this is it. | | 2) Are there any differences in the base TV audio among the manufacturers. I | am guessing no, since Home Theater is the direction here. But there are | various "sound level controls" that deals with differences in show vs. | commercial volume levels, LG has their "Clear Voice" technology, which (in | theory) would be helpful in hearing voice-range frequencies when the 'other | frequencies' were all over the map, etc. And maybe some speakers are better | than others. It is tough to judge these things in a showroom with tons of | ambient noise and no control over what show you are hearing. | | 3) "LED sets" typically seem to "be LED" in the technology that provides the | LCD a backlight. In principle you might get a better "true black" in these | cases as you could dim the LED's in that area (assuming a 'large area of | black'). But really true blacks is not a priority for us. However the | lifetime of the backlight source might well be an issue for us. Is LED | backlight lifetimes better than whatever "not LED" LCD sets use? | | Any comments would be appreciated - thanks. | | dave | LCDs are still best for bright rooms. 37" is kinda small for your viewing distance IMHO. It might be worth your while to peruse the Consumer Reports for August and October 2009 at your library for detailed comparisons. They have some info at their website but most is by subscription. As for sound, none are rated "excellent" and the few that are "very good" seem to fall down in some other category. The LG ClearVoice works very well by boosting mid range, but not much bass. Very popular among the older crowd. If you find a LCD with analog audio out (good luck!) the sound can be improved greatly by adding a set of 2.1 (w/subwoofer) computer speakers. D I assume that the 'analog out' requirement is to get the actual "TV sound" (from the ClearVoice technology) sent to the external speakers. Or is there another subtlety that I have missed here. Thanks. dave |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:21:03 -0400, "Dave Lee"
wrote: 3) My wife abhors the sound of any kind of 'home theater sound system'. She is somewhat hard of hearing and has some trouble with conventional TV speakers and hearing conversations in all cases. So a TV with a good, built-in sound system is a priority (even though there are FAR better solutions IMHO - she just isn't receptive to them) 4) Our viewing distance is 8-12'. But we are willing to put up with a 37" HDTV set simply because it would fit into our existing TV cabinet (see #1 above) With the requirement for a good but, apparently, unobtrusive audio setup, you might consider getting a powered sound-bar. Not one of the ones that tries to simulate multichannel but just an array of decently sized and directly aimed speakers. This can be mounted directly below the TV and can appear to be a part of it. Kal |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:21:03 -0400, "Dave Lee"
wrote: 1) Minimum "muss/fuss" setup. We will be using Time-Warner cable as our primary source. This is the variable that seems hardest to resolve. I want my TV to automatically pick the optimal display - which means true color and best resolution with absolutely no stretching of the picture. I have Comcast, so YMMV. Maybe you can ask questions based upon my experience. My Cable Box has Comcast's HDTV stations in the channel 400 range. The old versions of the channels are down in single digits. This sucks. My wife's TV doesn't use a cable box. But it still uses Cable. She has to remember to change from channel 7 to 7-1 and from 13 to 30-1. Worse, she watches The Food Channel 95% of the time, and we haven't been able to find the HDTV version of that without using a cable box. But she can watch picture-in-picture if she chooses. I have set up the main TV so we can switch to cable only (like hers), which would enable us to do picture-in-picture as well. But the premium channels are not available in HD without using the cable box. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Lee" wrote
3) My wife abhors the sound of any kind of 'home theater sound system'. She is somewhat hard of hearing and has some trouble with conventional TV speakers and hearing conversations in all cases. So a TV with a good, built-in sound system is a priority (even though there are FAR better solutions IMHO - she just isn't receptive to them) Do you ever use closed-captioning? Indispensible, sometimes. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kalman Rubinson" wrote in message ... On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:21:03 -0400, "Dave Lee" wrote: 3) My wife abhors the sound of any kind of 'home theater sound system'. She is somewhat hard of hearing and has some trouble with conventional TV speakers and hearing conversations in all cases. So a TV with a good, built-in sound system is a priority (even though there are FAR better solutions IMHO - she just isn't receptive to them) 4) Our viewing distance is 8-12'. But we are willing to put up with a 37" HDTV set simply because it would fit into our existing TV cabinet (see #1 above) With the requirement for a good but, apparently, unobtrusive audio setup, you might consider getting a powered sound-bar. Not one of the ones that tries to simulate multichannel but just an array of decently sized and directly aimed speakers. This can be mounted directly below the TV and can appear to be a part of it. Kal Is there such a thing where some reasonable amount of base is included. Based on my "shopping to date" (and my info is what I was getting from various sales-types) it seemed that only a sound bar would pretty much totally exclude any sound below a few hundred hertz. Maybe I misunderstood or maybe they didn't understand, but... dave ps. I AM NOT looking for some kind of couch-shaking base. I just don't want to have a speaker system with no response below 500 hz. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is HDTV Glare a common thing? | Psalm Nuclei | High definition TV | 15 | December 13th 07 03:13 AM |
| Panasonic TH-42PX6U and glare | SL | High definition TV | 3 | November 22nd 06 05:03 PM |
| Anti-Glare PLasma's | SL | High definition TV | 2 | November 22nd 06 03:30 AM |
| Can non-glare screen be removed from Toshiba DLP? | Jimbo | High definition TV | 1 | October 29th 05 10:54 PM |
| Lens Glare on Rear Projection TV | The Man From Mars | Home theater (general) | 2 | August 23rd 04 03:21 AM |