A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » UK digital tv
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Switch off at the socket?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #771  
Old September 24th 09, 04:06 PM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.digital-tv,uk.tech.broadcast
Richard Tobin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,351
Default Switch off at the socket?

In article ,
Bill Wright wrote:

Next time anyone complains about my habit of throwing apple cores
out of the van window into the ditch I will be able to claim green
immunity from the litter laws.


Has anyone actually complained about that?


Yes, I was parked near the water tower that supports the York TV Tx, on the
outskirts of that city. The pear core went right into the ditch.


Ah, but now you're comparing apples and oranges. Err pears.

-- Richard
--
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.
  #772  
Old September 24th 09, 06:02 PM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
Steve Thackery[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,566
Default Switch off at the socket?

If the Chinese did increase their energy use by 275% they would still
be using less than us.


Rubbish. In terms of CO2 production, which is what we care about in this
thread, Britain CO2-per-head is only about 1.55 times that of China.

So, increasing their energy use by only 100% per head would put them well
ahead of us, never mind 275%.

http://www.solcomhouse.com/toptenco2.htm

SteveT

  #773  
Old September 24th 09, 07:56 PM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
Java Jive[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,892
Default Switch off at the socket?

According to Mackay's book, UK's pc emissions are more than double
China's:

http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/w.../page_13.shtml

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:02:22 +0100, "Steve Thackery"
wrote:

In terms of CO2 production, which is what we care about in this
thread, Britain CO2-per-head is only about 1.55 times that of China.


======================================

Please always reply to news group as the email address in
this post's header does not exist. Alternatively, use one of the
contact addresses at:
http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html
http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html
  #774  
Old September 24th 09, 09:50 PM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
Andy Champ[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 794
Default Switch off at the socket?

The Natural Philosopher wrote:
charles wrote:

an interesting concept. When BBC RD were experimenting with video delay
lines in the late '60s, the prototype was an open mercury bath - with a
moveable dam at one end to alter the path length. I don't know of anyone
there who suffered ill effects. I'm certainly still alive - 40 years
later.

The thing is, no one really has the data.

We know that long term mercury exposure at level X does things that
don't happen when there is no mercury exposure.

Short of subjecting people to low dosage and seeing if e.g. their hair
falls out, no one knows what happens in between.

snip

Actually we have pretty good data on mercury exposure. Neurological
damage appears pretty high up the list.

"Twinkle Twinkle little bat, how I wonder what you're at".

Andy
  #775  
Old September 24th 09, 10:27 PM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
J. P. Gilliver (John)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 297
Default Switch off at the socket?

In message o.uk, Dave
Liquorice writes:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:23:48 +0100, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

Actually, lending to people who can't pay back is not as financially
daft as it sounds - AS LONG AS you are fairly certain that the price of
what they're borrowing to buy (in this case property) is going to
continue to rise, or at least not fall. Because: when they default, you
get what they _have_ managed to pay, plus the property back to sell.
Cruel and cynical, but lending to those who can't pay is not of itself
financially unsound: it's only lending on something that suddenly
_falls_ in value that is.


Or as happened in the sub-prime mortgage market in the US lending
more than the asset was ever going to be worth. That was the root
cause of the problem and the house of cards has collapsed when these,
effectively unsecured, loans became bad what 2, 3 years ago.

More than it was ever going to be worth - in how long?
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)[email protected]+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for ludicrously
outdated thoughts on PCs. **

PRIME DIRECTIVE, MY A**! Phasers on maximum!
  #776  
Old September 24th 09, 11:50 PM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
Dave Liquorice[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 253
Default Switch off at the socket?

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:27:49 +0100, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

Or as happened in the sub-prime mortgage market in the US lending
more than the asset was ever going to be worth. That was the root
cause of the problem and the house of cards has collapsed when

these,
effectively unsecured, loans became bad what 2, 3 years ago.


More than it was ever going to be worth - in how long?


The time period isn't particularly relevant, the fact the loan is for
more than the asset value is bad and nothing more than a gamble. You
can't know if some one is going to default in 1 month, 1 year, 10
years or never.

And remember this was the sub-prime market, loaning money to people
who didn't have much income and/or poor credit histories. A much
higher risk of default from the outset.

--
Cheers
Dave.



  #777  
Old September 25th 09, 03:54 AM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.digital-tv,uk.tech.broadcast
Bill Wright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,542
Default Switch off at the socket?


"J G Miller" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:35:50 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:

More likely to be eaten by some other wild creature of a species that we
don't hate, like feral cats ...


Presumably, therefore, the cat that you killed was a domestic cat.

Yes it was. We have a long tradition of killing cats. Hence my dad's
expression, 'There's more ways to kill a cat than choking it with lard."


or octopusses


I did not know that there was a species native to the ditches of
North Yorkshire? Do they lie in wait for passing strangers late
at night, then extend their tentacles, and drag them down into
the ditch and strangle them?

Yes they do. This is why so many people who are walking home from the pub or
a party end up in the ditch, with sucker marks all over their face.

Bill


  #778  
Old September 25th 09, 11:15 AM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.digital-tv,uk.tech.broadcast
Derek Geldard[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Switch off at the socket?

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:54:25 +0100, "Bill Wright"
wrote:


Yes they do. This is why so many people who are walking home from the pub or
a party end up in the ditch, with sucker marks all over their face.


And I blamed the barmaid.

Derek

  #779  
Old September 25th 09, 09:58 PM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.digital-tv,uk.tech.broadcast
J G Miller[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,296
Default Switch off at the socket?

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:54:25 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:

This is why so many people who are walking home from the pub or a party end
up in the ditch, with sucker marks all over their face.


This story has got definite potential as a movie.

What is needed is a hero who will go out and fight to the death with the
mother of all North Yorkshire ditch octopuses in the final climactic scene.

The question is though, what caused the octopuses to mutate?

Was it the radiation from the US listening base or the leak from a nearby
nuclear power station?
  #780  
Old September 26th 09, 01:23 AM posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.digital-tv,uk.tech.broadcast
Bill Wright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,542
Default Switch off at the socket?


"J G Miller" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:54:25 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:

This is why so many people who are walking home from the pub or a party
end
up in the ditch, with sucker marks all over their face.


This story has got definite potential as a movie.

What is needed is a hero who will go out and fight to the death with the
mother of all North Yorkshire ditch octopuses in the final climactic
scene.

The question is though, what caused the octopuses to mutate?

Was it the radiation from the US listening base or the leak from a nearby
nuclear power station?


It was the waste from York Brewery.

Bill


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RS232 Socket Danny UK sky 12 August 4th 05 10:02 AM
Scart socket that doesn't take the plug? Eric Dockum UK home cinema 6 September 12th 04 03:34 PM
Scart socket that doesn't take the plug? Eric Dockum UK home cinema 0 September 7th 04 01:53 PM
optical in socket lbockhed UK digital tv 3 December 27th 03 01:43 AM
Does the Scart socket on a TV have any outputs? Kev UK digital tv 10 August 20th 03 06:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.