![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Understand the manufacturers have to pay TV license to Thomson. Is it still
valid of the patent as TV has invented for long time? In the UK, the users must pay TV license of 131.5 pounds per year. Is it still valid in the UK or any change in the fee? Thanks, Scott |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Scott
wrote In the UK, the users must pay TV license of 131.5 pounds per year. Is it still valid in the UK or any change in the fee? Still valid and 142.50 pounds for colour TV -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:52:26 +0800, "Scott"
wrote: Understand the manufacturers have to pay TV license to Thomson. Is it still valid of the patent as TV has invented for long time? In the UK, the users must pay TV license of 131.5 pounds per year. Is it still valid in the UK or any change in the fee? 'Licence' in the UK :-) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:48:02 +0100, Alan
wrote: In message , Scott wrote In the UK, the users must pay TV license of 131.5 pounds per year. Is it still valid in the UK or any change in the fee? Still valid and 142.50 pounds for colour TV Worth every penny to avoid the commercial channels. Steve -- Neural Planner Software Ltd www.NPSL1.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:23:42 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme
wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:48:02 +0100, Alan wrote: In message , Scott wrote In the UK, the users must pay TV license of 131.5 pounds per year. Is it still valid in the UK or any change in the fee? Still valid and 142.50 pounds for colour TV Worth every penny to avoid the commercial channels. Definitely. A couple of years ago our local evening paper was complaining about the local BBC putting video clips of local news events on the BBC website. The local paper thought this was unfair - it wanted to put its own clips on its own website but couldn't stand the competition. I get the local evening paper six days a week. It costs just over 200 pounds each year for much less content that the BBC outputs in a year. -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Stephen
Wolstenholme writes Worth every penny to avoid the commercial channels. Agreed. The advertising on ITV is getting ever more desperate. It won't be long before they adopt American-style advertising, where as a film progresses, the adverts come in every 15 min, then 10, then 5. Weren't the commercial channels supposed to have been forced to transmit a signal when the adverts started to allow people to record a programme without the ads? What happened to that? Another bugbear is the way the volume leaps when the adverts start. It's inconsiderate. If I want to listen to the ****ing adverts, I will, don't force them on me. Is there a petition or something against this? -- (\__/) (='.'=) Bunny says Windows 7 is Vi$ta reloaded. (")_(") http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/windows_7.png |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike Tomlinson wrote:
Weren't the commercial channels supposed to have been forced to transmit a signal when the adverts started to allow people to record a programme without the ads? What happened to that? I don't recall that ever being the case. PDC codes on ITV/4/5 have always been arranged to capture the ads that surround and interrupt programmes, and the same applies to the recording flags on D-Sat and DTT platforms. Some VCR manufacturers have attempted to make their products detect when a break might be occurring, but that's about as far as it gets. Why would the regulator force the commercial channels to create a system that would allow viewers to avoid their funding system !? Advertising funded programming is looking more and more un-viable, and there are really too many advertising funded channels on Freeview so the situation is becoming unsustainable. ITV are rumoured to be considering making ITV2,3,4 subs only on Sky. Of course the real cheeky buggers are Sky, who charge you a subscription, to watch channels that also contain advertising breaks ! -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:36:30 +0100, Mike Tomlinson
wrote: In article , Stephen Wolstenholme writes Worth every penny to avoid the commercial channels. Agreed. The advertising on ITV is getting ever more desperate. It won't be long before they adopt American-style advertising, where as a film progresses, the adverts come in every 15 min, then 10, then 5. ITV adverts are already every 15 minutes most of evening. Weren't the commercial channels supposed to have been forced to transmit a signal when the adverts started to allow people to record a programme without the ads? What happened to that? There was a box in the top right hand corner that always use to appear a few seconds before the adverts? I haven't noticed it recently but that may be because I rarely watch any commercial channels these days. Another bugbear is the way the volume leaps when the adverts start. It's inconsiderate. If I want to listen to the ****ing adverts, I will, don't force them on me. Is there a petition or something against this? I often go to sleep when my wife insists on watching crap like the X Factor. The increase in volume is to make sure I wake up to watch the adverts ![]() Steve -- Neural Planner Software Ltd www.NPSL1.com |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Mark Carver
writes Why would the regulator force the commercial channels to create a system that would allow viewers to avoid their funding system !? You want to watch in real time, you get the ads whether you like it or not (e.g. live football). Record and have the option to skip the ads. I can do it with my PVR anyway, I just FF past the ads, but I thought there had been agreement (this would have been several years ago) to transmit a signal to indicate the start and stop of the ads, but can imagine that this would have been heavily opposed by the advertisers. IMO Freeview has been a disaster. Yes, we have digital telly, but with too many channels of complete crap a la the American model. This thing of repeats+1 of repeats (C4+1, More 4, Dave, Dave ja vu) is a joke. Why not use that bandwidth to transmit the five current terrestrial channels in HD instead? -- (\__/) (='.'=) Bunny says Windows 7 is Vi$ta reloaded. (")_(") http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/windows_7.png |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
There was a box in the top right hand corner that always use to appear a few seconds before the adverts? Cue Dot. Used internally within the ITV network to signal to the regions when a break was coming up during a networked programme. The regional control rooms then knew to be ready to fire off their adverts. You still see it from time to time, usually during live programmes, where the exact timings for a break cannot be determined and therefore the automation system is free running. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TV license from Thomsons SA & RCA | Scott | UK digital tv | 13 | June 5th 08 08:34 PM |
| Why the license fee is a rip-off | Turkey Cough | UK digital tv | 85 | March 20th 07 04:09 PM |
| Scrap License Fee - I've had enough | Alex Bird | UK digital tv | 186 | April 6th 05 10:42 PM |
| License fee more for freeview? | Coron | UK digital tv | 24 | November 1st 03 09:16 PM |
| TV License Evasion | Terry Eden | UK digital tv | 42 | July 10th 03 01:26 PM |