![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
PS and no they are not, just when overdriven their behaviour is graceful
compared with clipping in semiconductor amps. Yep, even harmonics, which the ear generates internally, and thus are less offensive than the odd harmonics you get from overdriving a transistor amp. I detect a certain topic-creep here! SteveT |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:18:49 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton"
wrote: "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , Legend11 writes John wrote: Would it be short sighted to buy a stereo system that does not have DAB? I can't believe they're contemplating turning FM off....it sounds wonderful and 'warm' compared to DAB. And yes, I've been all over Europe and heard the higher sampling rates.....it still doesn't compare. ![]() Surely it's the other way around? On my DAB/FM radio, the soft, warm, mellow, and sometimes burbly DAB audio spares me from being assailed by the harsh, tinny, high frequencies which are often present in the FM audio. -- Ian Oh dear it sounds like we are heading to the valve amplifiers are better argument... That's an idea. I'm now listening to DAB via valve amps! The best, or worst, of both worlds. PS and no they are not, just when overdriven their behaviour is graceful compared with clipping in semiconductor amps. -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , R. Mark Clayton
wrote: Oh dear it sounds like we are heading to the valve amplifiers are better argument... PS and no they are not, just when overdriven their behaviour is graceful compared with clipping in semiconductor amps. You left out the tendency for valve audio power amps to have a high o/p impedance. That tends to cause an alteration in the frequency response when connected to the loudspeaker. Sort of expensive 'tone control' effect. :-) Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Agamemnon wrote: There will be no FM switchover. Ofcom or whoever suggested this idiotic idea are totally clueless. Think most would agree with that. If any of the ILR stations switch exclusively to DAB they will lose every single one of their listeners to community radio. DAB is finished. You have some information which proves it won't just continue as is? It's already uses outdated technology which is over 20 years old so the entire existing platform will go long before FM does. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 4 Aug, 15:13, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , R. Mark Clayton wrote: Oh dear it sounds like we are heading to the valve amplifiers are better argument... PS and no they are not, just when overdriven their behaviour is graceful compared with clipping in semiconductor amps. You left out the tendency for valve audio power amps to have a high o/p impedance. That tends to cause an alteration in the frequency response when connected to the loudspeaker. Sort of expensive 'tone control' effect. *:-) The audible faults of even a half decent valve amp are minuscule compared with the atrocious sound of many UK DAB stations. Cheers, David. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
om... Better still actually make them the shape of other items, like door stops etc, so they can have a second use. Incidentally whatever happened to that digital radio mondial' or whatever it was called? They realized it was even worse than DAB. DRM+ is a bit better. -- Brian Gregory. (In the UK) To email me remove the letter vee. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Agamemnon wrote: You have some information which proves it won't just continue as is? It's already uses outdated technology which is over 20 years old so the entire existing platform will go long before FM does. By that yardstick how old is FM? 50 years? And it's outdated too. No one starting with a clean sheet would do stereo that way. -- *If I worked as much as others, I would do as little as they * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article
, 2Bdecided wrote: You left out the tendency for valve audio power amps to have a high o/p impedance. That tends to cause an alteration in the frequency response when connected to the loudspeaker. Sort of expensive 'tone control' effect. :-) The audible faults of even a half decent valve amp are minuscule compared with the atrocious sound of many UK DAB stations. And the audible faults of a poor valve amp are large compared to some DAB UK stations. Since we appear to be comparing apples to oranges. -- *I'm not your type. I'm not inflatable. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:10:13 +0100, Mike Henry
wrote: In , "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Agamemnon wrote: You have some information which proves it won't just continue as is? It's already uses outdated technology which is over 20 years old so the entire existing platform will go long before FM does. By that yardstick how old is FM? 50 years? And it's outdated too. No one starting with a clean sheet would do stereo that way. And yet the people starting with a clean sheet have delivered something worse. A nice comment, but a little unfair. What they delivered was pretty good. It was the subsequent cheese-paring of bit rates that made it worse. If FM deviation had been reduced to fit in more stations, its quality would be similarly reduced. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Mike Henry wrote: In , "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Agamemnon wrote: You have some information which proves it won't just continue as is? It's already uses outdated technology which is over 20 years old so the entire existing platform will go long before FM does. By that yardstick how old is FM? 50 years? And it's outdated too. No one starting with a clean sheet would do stereo that way. And yet the people starting with a clean sheet have delivered something worse. It started out ok. The bitrate was reduced subsequently. And much FM is ruined by over processing too. -- *If they arrest the Energizer Bunny, would they charge it with battery? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Handheld TVs after switchover? | John[_17_] | UK digital tv | 8 | June 1st 08 03:31 PM |
| Digital TV switchover - in the USA | GTS | UK digital tv | 3 | February 24th 08 10:57 AM |
| HD post-switchover | DAB sounds worse than FM | UK digital tv | 27 | October 18th 07 09:25 PM |
| No MUX 1 on Tacolneston after switchover? | Slow Flyer | UK digital tv | 2 | December 15th 06 05:21 PM |
| BBC Switchover Plans | Ed | UK digital tv | 30 | May 12th 04 08:44 PM |