![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations
to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Maybe the new service would be internet based and we would use media players and mobile phones to watch. Is this just another example of politicians spouting with no knowledge of the subject? Chris |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chris wrote:
According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Ofcom have wasted (IMHO) loads of our money devising frequency plans to cater for this mad (IMHO) plan. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/cond...eaved/summary/ |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Chris wrote: According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Maybe the new service would be internet based and we would use media players and mobile phones to watch. Is this just another example of politicians spouting with no knowledge of the subject? I'd say so. If ITV can't afford local news can't see how a local TV station could pay for itself. Unless run by volunteers. Chris -- *If they arrest the Energizer Bunny, would they charge it with battery? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Chris wrote: According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Maybe the new service would be internet based and we would use media players and mobile phones to watch. Is this just another example of politicians spouting with no knowledge of the subject? I'd say so. If ITV can't afford local news can't see how a local TV station could pay for itself. Unless run by volunteers. Chris Governments of either colour are always looking for a stick to beat the BBC with so they'd take funds out of the BBC licence fee for the non-existent 'public broadcasting benefit' that such a service will offer. -- Paul S |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I propose a day like they used to have in Iceland where ther is no tv for a
whole day. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Chris" wrote in message ... According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Maybe the new service would be internet based and we would use media players and mobile phones to watch. Is this just another example of politicians spouting with no knowledge of the subject? Chris |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Carver wrote:
Chris wrote: According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Ofcom have wasted (IMHO) loads of our money devising frequency plans to cater for this mad (IMHO) plan. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/cond...eaved/summary/ Thanks Mike. That looks like it. The document describes the "81 possible sites" that the times article quotes. I can't help thinking that in the future the city populations that such local stations are aimed at will get their TV and other media on-demand through a high speed internet connections rather than over the air. That way anyone who wants to produce local content can make it available - although whether there would be an audience is another matter. Chris |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Gaff wrote:
I propose a day like they used to have in Iceland where ther is no tv for a whole day. Brian Better get the sky+ disk filled up ready then ![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:24:03 +0100, Chris
wrote: According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Maybe the new service would be internet based and we would use media players and mobile phones to watch. Is this just another example of politicians spouting with no knowledge of the subject? The Roman politicians kept their plebs under control by entertaining them with circuses - gladiators killing each other and lions eating Christians. Modern day politicians want to keep the populace quiet by feeding us with *virtual* circuses on the magic box. The more channels the better. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chris wrote:
According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Maybe the new service would be internet based and we would use media players and mobile phones to watch. Is this just another example of politicians spouting with no knowledge of the subject? Chris A bit like the BBC's idea, which was running successfully as a pilot, of local TV on DTT. And was deemed not needed by the government. Richard |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Local stations in HD | metspitzer[_2_] | High definition TV | 5 | February 7th 09 05:24 PM |
| DTV Local stations in the rain | DanR | Tivo personal television | 2 | October 21st 05 05:40 PM |
| local stations in dd5.1 | felke001 | Home theater (general) | 5 | October 13th 03 09:24 PM |
| DirectTv local stations! | Mike | Satellite dbs | 1 | October 7th 03 10:58 PM |
| Help - Local Stations Question | Chris | Satellite dbs | 7 | August 23rd 03 02:47 PM |