![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
scribeth thus In article , tony sayer wrote: You must be very selective in what you've looked at - most of the 'foreign' stuff I've looked at off satellite is appalling. Sound especially. The 'arab' channels seem to think the norm is to wind everything up until it distorts. And then some. I thought we were discussing "European" broadcasters David and state ones such as France Musique and Bayern Klassik 4 etc.. Not some tinpot ones.. That's fine if you consider 'continental' as just being France and Germany. Well didn't Jimmy Young always refer to France and Germany as sur le continent;?.. You could almost consider that as EU broadcasters... -- Tony Sayer |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kay Robinson" wrote in message ... I can't speak for the EV crap, haven't watched that since Abba won. As to the others, I saw no problems from Winter Hill, must be a transmitter problem where you are. And when it comes to the dogs**t, complain to Ofcom not to the beeb, they never listen to viewers, furthermore, once the analogue signal goes every channel will have dogs so you'll have to put up with it or get a large group to pester MPs etc. I'm also on Winter Hill and can confirm BBC1 seems to have recently changed it's bitrate. Recordings on the PVR are significantly smaller in size and artefacts are now much more visually pronounced than previously. It's particularly bad around regional inserts - such as between 6pm-7pm, 10-10:45pm etc. Possibly in build up to DSO where the beeb have to squash everything up onto one mux (which will, of course, have a little more capacity post DSO with a change in config!) Just my tuppence worth ![]() Cheers, Mike |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 29 May 2009 16:36:06 +0100, Mikeapollo [email protected] wrote:
I'm also on Winter Hill and can confirm BBC1 seems to have recently changed it's bitrate. Recordings on the PVR are significantly smaller in size and artefacts are now much more visually pronounced than previously. It's particularly bad around regional inserts - such as between 6pm-7pm, 10-10:45pm etc. Possibly in build up to DSO where the beeb have to squash everything up onto one mux (which will, of course, have a little more capacity post DSO with a change in config!) BBC1 is now being stat muxed in a lot of places. I'm not sure how far the conversion to central coding and muxing has got, but it sounds like it may have reached you. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Paul Ratcliffe" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 May 2009 16:36:06 +0100, Mikeapollo [email protected] wrote: I'm also on Winter Hill and can confirm BBC1 seems to have recently changed it's bitrate. Recordings on the PVR are significantly smaller in size and artefacts are now much more visually pronounced than previously. It's particularly bad around regional inserts - such as between 6pm-7pm, 10-10:45pm etc. Possibly in build up to DSO where the beeb have to squash everything up onto one mux (which will, of course, have a little more capacity post DSO with a change in config!) BBC1 is now being stat muxed in a lot of places. I'm not sure how far the conversion to central coding and muxing has got, but it sounds like it may have reached you. Its reached Ridge Hill, with a noticeable drop in quality around a month to 6 weeks ago. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 30 May 2009 13:56:42 +0100, Kay Robinson
wrote: I'm also on Winter Hill and can confirm BBC1 seems to have recently changed it's bitrate. Recordings on the PVR are significantly smaller in size and artefacts are now much more visually pronounced than previously. I went digital four years ago, have never watched analogue since. The only artefacts I ever see are on the occasions when local stormtroopers rev up their motorbikes on passing my window. That is not an artefact. That is decoder failure caused by excessive impulse interference. If you cannot see any artefacts then you are blind. Or maybe just stupid. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kay Robinson" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 May 2009 16:36:06 +0100, "Mikeapollo" sharpened a new quill and scratched: "Kay Robinson" wrote in message ... I can't speak for the EV crap, haven't watched that since Abba won. As to the others, I saw no problems from Winter Hill, must be a transmitter problem where you are. And when it comes to the dogs**t, complain to Ofcom not to the beeb, they never listen to viewers, furthermore, once the analogue signal goes every channel will have dogs so you'll have to put up with it or get a large group to pester MPs etc. I'm also on Winter Hill and can confirm BBC1 seems to have recently changed it's bitrate. Recordings on the PVR are significantly smaller in size and artefacts are now much more visually pronounced than previously. I went digital four years ago, have never watched analogue since. Aren't you lucky! I have to switch to analogue (BBC) about twice a day when the digital signal become unwatchable. And that's with a good receiver on my PVR, the receiver on my TV is unwatchable for the whole day. I live in a listed building in a conservation area and hence have my aerial in the loft (and a sat dish is a complete no-no). I think that reducing the DTTV bandwidth down to the level where it can only be received by people with perfect reception, on the grounds that others can get freeesat, is completely unacceptable. (Fortunately I only rent so I can move if it gets worse) tim |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 30 May 2009 13:56:42 +0100, Kay Robinson wrote:
The only artefacts I ever see are on the occasions when local stormtroopers rev up their motorbikes on passing my window. When your local relay gets converted from FFT 2k to 8k mode, this interference problem should at least be diminished, if not disappear altogether. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kay Robinson" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 30 May 2009 13:28:40 GMT, Paul Ratcliffe sharpened a new quill and scratched: On Sat, 30 May 2009 13:56:42 +0100, Kay Robinson wrote: I'm also on Winter Hill and can confirm BBC1 seems to have recently changed it's bitrate. Recordings on the PVR are significantly smaller in size and artefacts are now much more visually pronounced than previously. I went digital four years ago, have never watched analogue since. The only artefacts I ever see are on the occasions when local stormtroopers rev up their motorbikes on passing my window. That is not an artefact. That is decoder failure caused by excessive impulse interference. If you cannot see any artefacts then you are blind. Or maybe just stupid. I'm niether blind nor stupid you ignorant little fairy. Just because you have a ****-poor setup doesn't mean everyone else has your inabilities. Plonk.... Umm... I think he was saying that his set up IS so good that he can see the missing pixels that you seem to be unable to It needs civilization, it needs second thoughts, to realise that Napoleon and Ceasar and Alexander are not really the highest types of humanity, that war making is not a glory but a crime I wouldn't put Napoleon in that category, if the royalists of Europe and the fools that were brainwashed or just desperate to take the king's shilling had surrendered, he wouldn't have had to fight them Vive la République Steve Terry |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 31 May 2009 00:30:24 +0100, Kay Robinson
wrote: I went digital four years ago, have never watched analogue since. The only artefacts I ever see are on the occasions when local stormtroopers rev up their motorbikes on passing my window. That is not an artefact. That is decoder failure caused by excessive impulse interference. If you cannot see any artefacts then you are blind. Or maybe just stupid. I'm niether blind nor stupid you ignorant little fairy. Just because you have a ****-poor setup doesn't mean everyone else has your inabilities. Ah, definitely stupid. Apparently blind. Unable to comprehend. Silly cow. Moo. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kay Robinson wrote:
From some tales I read here I consider myself lucky. Friends of mine elsewhere can only get analogue with poor reception, they live in a listed building in a conservation area, also rather hemmed in by hills. I don't know what they'll do when the switch off for their area happens. They will put up a dish and get Sky or Freesat, just as everyone else does, and they will do it without getting any prior approval, just as everyone else does. If they genuinely can't get Freeview or a cable connection, I doubt if there's a local authority in the country who would dare to take action against them for fear of the backlash in the local and possible national press on the lines of 'Local Council stops me watching TV' shock. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why Would BBC1&2 Become Unavail on Freeview? | Davy[_2_] | UK digital tv | 30 | August 26th 08 07:01 PM |
| BBC2 Freeview bit rate decreased? | A. J. Moss | UK digital tv | 18 | August 6th 08 04:56 PM |
| BBCi bit rate on Freeview? | DAB sounds worse than FM | UK digital tv | 0 | September 26th 07 11:29 PM |
| BBC1 Freeview | Chris | UK digital tv | 11 | June 8th 06 12:30 AM |
| freeview bbc1+2 not available | francis | UK digital tv | 1 | April 21st 04 11:36 PM |