![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Norman Wells" wrote in message ... Zimmy wrote: Then there's all the fun of finding which of at least 5 unlabelled cassettes you recorded onto, winding the tape back to try to find the beginning of the recording (only to overshoot into ad breaks from a previous recording but keep going back), getting halfway through a program only find another family member started a new recording over the top because it was the only tape they could find, not to mention those lovely noise bars due to wrinkles on the tapes that a little skeleton said would last forever. How silly of me, why would anyone want to give all that up? No reason at all, since they're all very minor niggles, most of which could be avoided with a felt tip pen, a carefully chosen threat to wellbeing, or a removed tab. No, it's the other things you wouldn't want to give up, like being able to take the original recorded medium out of the machine, and give it to someone else or play it somewhere more convenient. Or being able to store the original recording virtually forever without fear of losing everything through something serendipitous like a hard disk crash or machine replacement. Or being able to play your existing comprehensive set of films, Red Dwarfs etc on other tapes that you've so lovingly collected over the years. Or not having to concern yourself with archiving to Region 8 double layer sandwich +R-RW-XD green wave DVDs or some other impenetrable medium that you can't make work, just to achieve the same benefits that tapes give you for free. Or the fact that my 3 year old can change video cassettes by herself, selecting by the picture on the case and not needing to be able read menus and program lists. All good points, and probably why I still have a VCR underneath my PVR and DVD. :-) Z |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Zimmy" wrote in message ...
Then there's all the fun of finding which of at least 5 unlabelled cassettes you recorded onto, winding the tape back to try to find the beginning of the recording (only to overshoot into ad breaks from a previous recording but keep going back), getting halfway through a program only find another family member started a new recording over the top because it was the only tape they could find, not to mention those lovely noise bars due to wrinkles on the tapes that a little skeleton said would last forever. Send them back for a replacement - they have a 'lifetime' guarantee - or is that the lifetime of the medium? -- Max Demian |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim wrote:
Hardly any modern boxes have modulators. The TVONICS range seems to be an exception. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim" wrote in message net... Jim wrote: Hardly any modern boxes have modulators. The TVONICS range seems to be an exception. Yup, I thought I'd found a suitable receiver for them in the MDR-250 receiver. It seems as though there's no option to disable the interactive stuff on that box though. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 7 May 2009 02:58:30 -0700 (PDT), 2Bdecided
wrote: On 7 May, 10:32, "Womble" wrote: Can anyone recommend a current Freeview receiver that can be used with a VCR to do timed recordings (sadly a PVR is not an option for my elderly relative)? Requirements are 1) timer events 2) ability to disable interactive red dot/MHEG on screen messages Ideally,the following would also be nice 3) ability to disable checking for new channels 4) an RF modulator The Tvonics MDR-250 seems ok on 1,3,4 but sadly not 2, so all the recordings would have the red dot rubbish on them. *It's to receive from Stockland Hill with the new 8k transmissions, so older boxes from ebay may not be suitable - although I am considering the old silver Netgem iplayer, which should work ok. Any recommendations on what to go for (or avoid!) are welcomed. *Many thanks. Fred Are you aware of the one VCR (Daewoo DVRT43), and several DVD recorders, with Freeview built-in? That would solve a few problems. There are also some Freeview boxes that will control some external recorders via SCART, meaning you only have to set one timer. Not sure of the details - someone here has one. I have a Philips VR550 VCR. This has a recording mode called RECORD LINK. When set to this mode (via the Menu) it will come out of standby and start recording the signal on AV2 when there is a signal on AV2. So with a Freeview STB connected via Scart to AV2 on the VCR, set the timers on the STB for the programmes you want to record, switch the STB to standby, set the VCR to Record Link mode switch the VCR to standby. And then remember to switch the VCR out of standby before you do anything more with the STB otherwise as soon as you take the STB out of standby the VCR will wake up and start recording! Manual at: http://www.p4c.philips.com/files/v/v...07_dfu_eng.pdf Although it refers to "Automatic controlled recording from a satellite receiver (RECORD LINK)" it is not limited to satellite receivers. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmy wrote:
Or the fact that my 3 year old can change video cassettes by herself, selecting by the picture on the case and not needing to be able read menus and program lists. She's already over qualified for a job at ITV3. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 08 May 2009 21:31:03 +0100, Mark Carver wrote:
She's already over qualified for a job at ITV3. If that is the case, then I hate to think how low the qualifications for a job at ITV-2 must be. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8 May, 22:40, J G Miller wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 21:31:03 +0100, Mark Carver wrote: * * She's already over qualified for a job at ITV3. If that is the case, then I hate to think how low the qualifications for a job at ITV-2 must be. Insert "Emmerdale" tape. Press "Play". Repeat every three hours. -- WH |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Norman Wells" wrote in message ... Zimmy wrote: Then there's all the fun of finding which of at least 5 unlabelled cassettes you recorded onto, winding the tape back to try to find the beginning of the recording (only to overshoot into ad breaks from a previous recording but keep going back), getting halfway through a program only find another family member started a new recording over the top because it was the only tape they could find, not to mention those lovely noise bars due to wrinkles on the tapes that a little skeleton said would last forever. How silly of me, why would anyone want to give all that up? No reason at all, since they're all very minor niggles, most of which could be avoided with a felt tip pen, a carefully chosen threat to wellbeing, or a removed tab. No, it's the other things you wouldn't want to give up, like being able to take the original recorded medium out of the machine, and give it to someone else or play it somewhere more convenient. Or being able to store the original recording virtually forever without fear of losing everything through something serendipitous like a hard disk crash or machine replacement. Or being able to play your existing comprehensive set of films, Red Dwarfs etc on other tapes that you've so lovingly collected over the years. Or not having to concern yourself with archiving to Region 8 double layer sandwich +R-RW-XD green wave DVDs or some other impenetrable medium that you can't make work, just to achieve the same benefits that tapes give you for free. 4GBs of SD flash memory now under a tenner, in my view an ideal replacement for transferable videotape, yet no PVR manufacturers (or many other equipment suppliers come to that) would appear to be aware of its existence. It certainly can't be very much to do with costs, as my Chinese made £30.00 DVD player is capable of playing DIVX recordings from SD cards (or memory sticks) at much better quality than VHS tape... from the point of view of longevity I've been using and reusing flash memory for a number of years now and haven't yet experienced a single catastrophic card failure, even with quite old cards, I've asked several other people I know who also use SD cards as a substitute for tape and it seems their experiences would bear that out. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ivan wrote:
4GBs of SD flash memory now under a tenner, in my view an ideal replacement for transferable videotape, yet no PVR manufacturers (or many other equipment suppliers come to that) would appear to be aware of its existence. I might be very wrong, but isn't there an access time problem with memory of that size ? Fine for playing a file from the start, but jumping around, and randomly accessing the content might be too sluggish for a PVR ? -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Preparing for Sky+ - suitable cable? | Sean Inglis[_2_] | UK digital tv | 2 | November 24th 07 12:54 PM |
| RF amplifier suitable for cable | [email protected] | High definition TV | 10 | September 18th 07 10:56 PM |
| aerial suitable for caravaning/motorhome | oorak | UK digital tv | 11 | January 14th 06 11:50 PM |
| Plasmas - 852x480? Suitable for PAL? | Elliot J | UK home cinema | 2 | November 17th 04 04:00 PM |
| Is this Dish & Receiver suitable for my needs | Mike in DE. | Satellite dbs | 4 | July 21st 03 06:14 PM |