Digital change over-Wireless Video sender.

"Dhropta Guli" wrote in message
...
Mark Carver wrote:
Peter wrote:

Thanks for the replies. The TVs have set top aerials (analogue reception
not too
good). Looking at the back they have two jack plug sockets marked Audio
(white) and Video (yellow). Cabling is really a nightmare with lathe and
plaster walls and ceilings.

The good news is that'll you'll be able to plug a Video sender receiver
into them using an appropriate Scart to jack adaptor.

The bad news is that it sounds like Freeview reception using a Freeview
box local to the TV, will be a non starter unless you run in a proper
aerial feed for it.


With only yellow and white inputs it looks like the tv is a mono set. No
problem, the video sender will work fine but maybe you should consider
upgrading the tv so you can get the weather forecast in full glorious
nicam stereo sound!

NICAM capability of a TV will be useless after ASO.

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%

"Dhropta Guli" wrote in message
...
Peter wrote:
We are scheduled in the SW to have analogue TV turned off shortly. I
already have a Digital TV (terrestrial and sky connection). As it is not
possible in my old house to run hidden aerial cables to other rooms I was
wondering if a wireless video sender could be used to old portable TVs
that do not have a scart connections? or would I have to buy TVs with
scart sockets to use such a system? Are these video senders any good? Any
help appreciated.

Peter
If you do go the video-sender route try one of the newer 5.8ghz ones. I've
just got one and it is far superior to the older type. No interference at
all from my broadband wifi or microwave cooker, unlike the original which
was plagued with it.

Bob

I think mine is being wiped out by Bluetooth signals from nest door

On Fri, 01 May 2009 19:33:13 +0100, Dhropta Guli wrote:

but maybe you should consider upgrading the tv so you
can get the weather forecast in full glorious
nicam stereo sound!

For digital television transmissions, the sound is not NICAM stereo but
MPEG-2 stereo for SD and H.264 for HD.

And is it not the case that for video senders, they only transmit a
monophonic sound channel? Or did I get that wrong.

J G Miller wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 19:33:13 +0100, Dhropta Guli wrote:

but maybe you should consider upgrading the tv so you
can get the weather forecast in full glorious
nicam stereo sound!

For digital television transmissions, the sound is not NICAM stereo but
MPEG-2 stereo for SD and H.264 for HD.

And is it not the case that for video senders, they only transmit a
monophonic sound channel? Or did I get that wrong.



Mine certainly has stereo connections and so did the previous one.

J G Miller wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 19:33:13 +0100, Dhropta Guli wrote:

but maybe you should consider upgrading the tv so you
can get the weather forecast in full glorious
nicam stereo sound!

For digital television transmissions, the sound is not NICAM stereo but
MPEG-2 stereo for SD and H.264 for HD.

And is it not the case that for video senders, they only transmit a
monophonic sound channel? Or did I get that wrong.

You can stuff a SPDIF signal through the video channel of most senders, and
transmit digital audio, but of course without any video :-)

--
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.

www.paras.org.uk

In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
Peter wrote:


Thanks for the replies. The TVs have set top aerials (analogue
reception not too
good). Looking at the back they have two jack plug sockets marked
Audio (white) and Video (yellow). Cabling is really a nightmare with
lathe and plaster walls and ceilings.

Assuming that the yellow and white sockets are *inputs* [1] and not
*outputs*, you could probably feed them using video senders - provided you
get some with phono [2] connections rather than SCARTs.

[1] If they are inputs, there will be some way of selecting 'External' or
somesuch, rather than using the sets' own tuners.

[2] With the ones which I have - from Maplins - the units themselves have
phono connections, and they are provided with Phono to SCART adapters to
enable them to be connected to SCART-based devices. If you ignore the
adapters, you can use phono-to-phono leads to connect them to phono-based
devices. For example, I sometimes use mine with a nesting-box camera, which
has phono connections, and sometimes to connect TV sound to my Hi-Fi
system - again with phono connections at the hifi end.
--
Cheers,
Roger
______
Email address maintained for newsgroup use only, and not regularly
monitored.. Messages sent to it may not be read for several weeks.
PLEASE REPLY TO NEWSGROUP!

"Allan" wrote in message
...
"Dhropta Guli" wrote in message
...
Peter wrote:
We are scheduled in the SW to have analogue TV turned off shortly. I
already have a Digital TV (terrestrial and sky connection). As it is not
possible in my old house to run hidden aerial cables to other rooms I
was wondering if a wireless video sender could be used to old portable
TVs that do not have a scart connections? or would I have to buy TVs
with scart sockets to use such a system? Are these video senders any
good? Any help appreciated.

Peter
If you do go the video-sender route try one of the newer 5.8ghz ones.
I've just got one and it is far superior to the older type. No
interference at all from my broadband wifi or microwave cooker, unlike
the original which was plagued with it.

Bob

I think mine is being wiped out by Bluetooth signals from nest door


It wouldn't by any chance happen to be a Mr. and Mrs. Bird who live there
would it?

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Peter" saying
something like:

Cabling is really a nightmare with lathe and
plaster walls and ceilings.

I'm not surprised. You'd have to be really careful with the weight of
machine tools up there.

The message
from Grimly Curmudgeon contains these words:

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Peter" saying
something like:

Cabling is really a nightmare with lathe and
plaster walls and ceilings.

I'm not surprised. You'd have to be really careful with the weight of
machine tools up there.

Quite! And, may I add, he was just one letter short of getting into a
lather, ;-)

--
Regards, John.

Please remove the "ohggcyht" before replying.
The address has been munged to reject Spam-bots.

The message . co.uk.invalid
from lid (Alan Pemberton) contains
these words:

Johnny B Good wrote:

The message
from Grimly Curmudgeon contains
these words:

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Peter" saying
something like:

Cabling is really a nightmare with lathe and
plaster walls and ceilings.

I'm not surprised. You'd have to be really careful with the weight of
machine tools up there.

Quite! And, may I add, he was just one letter short of getting into a
lather, ;-)

And you're one short of blather.

Ah, but that was deliberate! Still, it's good to see you noticed that
fact. ;-)

--
Regards, John.

Please remove the "ohggcyht" before replying.
The address has been munged to reject Spam-bots.