A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » High definition TV
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

HDTV tuner confusion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 18th 09, 07:49 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Wes Newell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 750
Default HDTV tuner confusion

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:27:46 -0700, UCLAN wrote:

Wes Newell wrote:

*What* marketing people? I have seen numerous TV specifications that
correctly state that the tuner is: ATSC (8VSB/QAM), NTSC.


And I've seen *many* specs online that list them as ATSC/NTSC/QAM. or
other combos of the 3.


And I explained why in my previous post.

And not all ATSC tuners do QAM.


Never said they did. That's why QAM is mentioned in the spec. 8VSB need
not be mentioned in the tuner spec since it's part of the ATSC spec.

None of this changes the fact that both QAM and 8VSB are modulation
methods used for ATSC, and that QAM is *not* and encoding method. Saying
that ATSC is for over-the-air only is just plain WRONG.


I'm not disagreeing, just that some atsc tuners do not have qam capability
and being so I think it's best that they advertise it's capability
separately. AFAIK, all ATSC tuners do have 8VSB (OTA) capability.



--
Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org
My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm
Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm
AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php
  #22  
Old March 18th 09, 11:42 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
L Alpert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 374
Default HDTV tuner confusion


"UCLAN" wrote in message
...
L Alpert wrote:

If you want to receive OTA, QAM is not needed. Most ATSC tuners
are QAM compatible these days, which is good if you subscribe to
cable without their box as so you can pick up HD stations that are
no scrambled (usually the locals), as QAM is the encoding
technology used by the cable companies.

QAM is *NOT* an encoding technology. QAM is a modulation technology
used
on ATSC signals by cable companies to increase bandwidth. OTA uses
8VSB
modulation of ATSC.


Some say potatoes, some say potatoes.


The difference between "encoding" and "modulating" technologies is
*not*
simple pronunciation.


I understand the concepts between modulation and encoding schemes, but
it means little to the layman. All he cares about is does it work.
If you need to be told you are right, so be it, you are right.


  #23  
Old March 19th 09, 05:26 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
UCLAN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,008
Default HDTV tuner confusion

Wes Newell wrote:

AFAIK, all ATSC tuners do have 8VSB (OTA) capability.


As I wrote twice in this thread, ATSC tuners *have* to demodulate 8VSB.
It's in the ATSC specification. A tuner cannot be called an ATSC tuner
if it *can't* demodulate 8VSB.
  #24  
Old March 20th 09, 09:29 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
RickMerrill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default HDTV tuner confusion

L Alpert wrote:
"UCLAN" wrote in message
...
L Alpert wrote:

If you want to receive OTA, QAM is not needed. Most ATSC tuners
are QAM compatible these days, which is good if you subscribe to
cable without their box as so you can pick up HD stations that are
no scrambled (usually the locals), as QAM is the encoding
technology used by the cable companies.
QAM is *NOT* an encoding technology. QAM is a modulation technology
used
on ATSC signals by cable companies to increase bandwidth. OTA uses
8VSB
modulation of ATSC.
Some say potatoes, some say potatoes.

The difference between "encoding" and "modulating" technologies is
*not*
simple pronunciation.


I understand the concepts between modulation and encoding schemes, but
it means little to the layman. All he cares about is does it work.
If you need to be told you are right, so be it, you are right.


Copernicus was "right" too, but nobody believed him for, what, 400
years? I wonder if he was angry about it too?

  #25  
Old March 21st 09, 05:33 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
RickMerrill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default HDTV tuner confusion

UCLAN wrote:
Wes Newell wrote:

AFAIK, all ATSC tuners do have 8VSB (OTA) capability.


As I wrote twice in this thread, ATSC tuners *have* to demodulate 8VSB.
It's in the ATSC specification. A tuner cannot be called an ATSC tuner
if it *can't* demodulate 8VSB.


Worse case of Violent Agreement I have seen in a long time!-)
  #26  
Old March 21st 09, 08:12 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
UCLAN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,008
Default HDTV tuner confusion

RickMerrill wrote:

AFAIK, all ATSC tuners do have 8VSB (OTA) capability.


As I wrote twice in this thread, ATSC tuners *have* to demodulate 8VSB.
It's in the ATSC specification. A tuner cannot be called an ATSC tuner
if it *can't* demodulate 8VSB.


Worse case of Violent Agreement I have seen in a long time!-)


Except for the use of "AFAIK." Since 8VSB is mandatory (according to the
ATSC spec), "AFAIK" is a very illuminating qualifier.
  #27  
Old March 21st 09, 08:41 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
RickMerrill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default HDTV tuner confusion

UCLAN wrote:
RickMerrill wrote:

AFAIK, all ATSC tuners do have 8VSB (OTA) capability.

As I wrote twice in this thread, ATSC tuners *have* to demodulate 8VSB.
It's in the ATSC specification. A tuner cannot be called an ATSC tuner
if it *can't* demodulate 8VSB.


Worse case of Violent Agreement I have seen in a long time!-)


Except for the use of "AFAIK." Since 8VSB is mandatory (according to the
ATSC spec), "AFAIK" is a very illuminating qualifier.


Did it cross your mind that he was being humble?

  #28  
Old March 22nd 09, 06:01 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
UCLAN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,008
Default HDTV tuner confusion

RickMerrill wrote:

AFAIK, all ATSC tuners do have 8VSB (OTA) capability.

As I wrote twice in this thread, ATSC tuners *have* to demodulate 8VSB.
It's in the ATSC specification. A tuner cannot be called an ATSC tuner
if it *can't* demodulate 8VSB.

Worse case of Violent Agreement I have seen in a long time!-)


Except for the use of "AFAIK." Since 8VSB is mandatory (according to the
ATSC spec), "AFAIK" is a very illuminating qualifier.


Did it cross your mind that he was being humble?


By leaving the possibility that a non-8VSB compliant ATSC tuner exists? No.
BY DEFINITION, an ATSC tuner is 8VSB compliant.

--
AFAIK, the Sun sets in the west.
  #29  
Old March 22nd 09, 08:07 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Wes Newell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 750
Default HDTV tuner confusion

On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:01:46 -0700, UCLAN wrote:

RickMerrill wrote:

AFAIK, all ATSC tuners do have 8VSB (OTA) capability.

As I wrote twice in this thread, ATSC tuners *have* to demodulate
8VSB. It's in the ATSC specification. A tuner cannot be called an
ATSC tuner if it *can't* demodulate 8VSB.

Worse case of Violent Agreement I have seen in a long time!-)

Except for the use of "AFAIK." Since 8VSB is mandatory (according to
the ATSC spec), "AFAIK" is a very illuminating qualifier.


Did it cross your mind that he was being humble?


By leaving the possibility that a non-8VSB compliant ATSC tuner exists?
No. BY DEFINITION, an ATSC tuner is 8VSB compliant.


So then what are QAM cable boxes without 8vsb support? Since QAM is a part
of the ATSC spec, wouldn't that make them ATSC tuners.:-)



--
Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org
My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm
Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm
AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php
  #30  
Old March 22nd 09, 09:21 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Wes Newell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 750
Default HDTV tuner confusion

On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:07:43 +0000, Wes Newell wrote:

On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:01:46 -0700, UCLAN wrote:

RickMerrill wrote:

AFAIK, all ATSC tuners do have 8VSB (OTA) capability.

As I wrote twice in this thread, ATSC tuners *have* to demodulate
8VSB. It's in the ATSC specification. A tuner cannot be called an
ATSC tuner if it *can't* demodulate 8VSB.

Worse case of Violent Agreement I have seen in a long time!-)

Except for the use of "AFAIK." Since 8VSB is mandatory (according to
the ATSC spec), "AFAIK" is a very illuminating qualifier.

Did it cross your mind that he was being humble?


By leaving the possibility that a non-8VSB compliant ATSC tuner exists?
No. BY DEFINITION, an ATSC tuner is 8VSB compliant.


So then what are QAM cable boxes without 8vsb support? Since QAM is a
part of the ATSC spec, wouldn't that make them ATSC tuners.:-)


BTW, only 16 qam is part of the atsc standard, not 256 qam, which is the
cable standard.



--
Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org
My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm
Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm
AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HDTV confusion david High definition TV 11 May 20th 04 04:13 AM
VSB confusion New to HDTV and a few questions Nick D High definition TV 26 April 13th 04 04:40 AM
NTSC Tuner Confusion Timothy J. Miller High definition TV 5 February 25th 04 12:59 AM
HDTV Confusion nealf High definition TV 2 January 6th 04 08:17 PM
HDTV Confusion nealf High definition TV 0 January 6th 04 05:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.