![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The draft DIY digital TV intro article is he
http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=Digital_TV Feel free to add to it directly (or post stuff here...) Doing that one prompted a bit of a revamp or the TV aerial one - I have added some tips on DIYing these - but you may be able to think of mo http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=TV_aerial A bit that was in there - but seemed out of place was on VHF aerials. That is now waiting for some embellishment to turn it into a proper article. (I am not sure how realistic its claims are anyway - never having tried using a TV aerial for radio). Any thoughts?: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=VHF_aerial (Could probably do with some sections on dimple dipoles, yagi, and the (in)famous halo etc). There is one on aerial plugs: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...V_aerial_plugs Another on cable: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...for_TV_aerials And finally one one amps: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...rial_amplifier (note, due to spammers some of these articles are only editable if you create yourself an account on the DIY wiki first) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Rumm" wrote in message et... The draft DIY digital TV intro article is he http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=Digital_TV Feel free to add to it directly (or post stuff here...) Doing that one prompted a bit of a revamp or the TV aerial one - I have added some tips on DIYing these - but you may be able to think of mo http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=TV_aerial A bit that was in there - but seemed out of place was on VHF aerials. That is now waiting for some embellishment to turn it into a proper article. (I am not sure how realistic its claims are anyway - never having tried using a TV aerial for radio). Any thoughts?: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=VHF_aerial (Could probably do with some sections on dimple dipoles, yagi, and the (in)famous halo etc). There is one on aerial plugs: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...V_aerial_plugs Another on cable: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...for_TV_aerials And finally one one amps: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...rial_amplifier (note, due to spammers some of these articles are only editable if you create yourself an account on the DIY wiki first) Yes it's coming along nicely now. One typo and one factual 1 "*Personally* Video Recorders" 2 name the additional channels that a FTV card will decode Also explain that an ex-Sky subscription card is in effect a FTV card. I think there is a need to explain more fully the differences between the two Freesats, I think you need to separate it from the SKY heading. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Graham. wrote:
Yes it's coming along nicely now. One typo and one factual 1 "*Personally* Video Recorders" ta - fixed 2 name the additional channels that a FTV card will decode Added link to wikipedia article on this (moving target, so may as well let some one else keep up! ;-) Also explain that an ex-Sky subscription card is in effect a FTV card. Yup, good point I think there is a need to explain more fully the differences between the two Freesats, I think you need to separate it from the SKY heading. What, add "Freesat from sky" as a separate heading you mean? -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Rumm" wrote in message et... http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=TV_aerial This is a very impressive document. Good sound practical advice. I hope you don't mind a few suggestions. De-typoed: Small set-top aerials vary in performance from poor to useless in most areas. In strong signal locations one may be ok for a portable TV. The advantages are minimal cost, no installation, and portability. De-typoed: In practice roof mounting gives a much stronger and better quality signal than a loft aerial. A loft aerial will be quite satisfactory in many cases, but not always. Rooftop is of course less convenient and more expensive. Outdoor aerials, poles and cables have limited life, so the expense is repeated over time. Error: Baluns Nearly all TV aerials are described by the manufacturer as 75 ohm aerials, yet nearly all are really designed as 300 ohm aerials, with construction details reducing this to some degree, but not to 75 ohm. Connecting a 300 ohm aerial to 75? cable causes loss of gain, tendency to reflections, and some degree of degradation of signal quality. Better aerials have a small balun inside that transforms the 300 ohm signal to a genuine 75 ohm feed. All CAI approved aerials have this. In fact even cheap aerials are designed to match to 75ohm feeder. (More or less). A folded dipole with no parasitic elements would match to 300 ohm. Once you start adding elements the characteristic impedence drops. The balun (in this case) usually converts 75 ohm balanced to 75 ohm unbalanced. However some manufacturers use the balun design to tweak the matching, so the dipole terminals might not be quite 75 ohm. The old baluns for VHF FM actually did convert 75 to 300 or vice versa, as well as converting balanced to unbalanced. De-typoed: a.. Don't choose a position where it will have your eye out every time you climb through the loft hatch! De-typoed: a.. If more than one location is available, do a survey at each position to see which is best. The easiest chimney to get to might not offer the best results! De-typoed: Height is important - raising an aerial as little as a metre De-typoed: If multipath (i.e. ghosting) is a problem, try a more directional aerial, and try different bearings. It may be preferable Bill |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember John Rumm saying something like: A bit that was in there - but seemed out of place was on VHF aerials. That is now waiting for some embellishment to turn it into a proper article. (I am not sure how realistic its claims are anyway - never having tried using a TV aerial for radio). Any thoughts?: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=VHF_aerial It's true enough. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Graham." saying something like: Also explain that an ex-Sky subscription card is in effect a FTV card. Istr, if a card has been blocked by Sky for non-payment, it will not work at all. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Rumm wrote:
(Could probably do with some sections on dimple dipoles, yagi, and the (in)famous halo etc). It certainly should. Then I could find out what on eath they are... -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
... John Rumm wrote: (Could probably do with some sections on dimple dipoles, yagi, and the (in)famous halo etc). It certainly should. Then I could find out what on eath they are... I thought they were sexual positions myself - almost made being a radio amatuer an attractive proposition )-- Bob Mannix (anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Bill Wright
scribeth thus "John Rumm" wrote in message net... http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=TV_aerial This is a very impressive document. Good sound practical advice. I hope you don't mind a few suggestions. De-typoed: Small set-top aerials vary in performance from poor to useless in most areas. In strong signal locations one may be ok for a portable TV. The advantages are minimal cost, no installation, and portability. De-typoed: In practice roof mounting gives a much stronger and better quality signal than a loft aerial. A loft aerial will be quite satisfactory in many cases, but not always. Rooftop is of course less convenient and more expensive. Outdoor aerials, poles and cables have limited life, so the expense is repeated over time. Around 20 odd years?.. Seems unnecessary to make that point IMHO. Might put some off an otherwise proper way to do it.. Error: Baluns Nearly all TV aerials are described by the manufacturer as 75 ohm aerials, yet nearly all are really designed as 300 ohm aerials, with construction details reducing this to some degree, but not to 75 ohm. Connecting a 300 ohm aerial to 75? cable causes loss of gain, tendency to reflections, and some degree of degradation of signal quality. Better aerials have a small balun inside that transforms the 300 ohm signal to a genuine 75 ohm feed. All CAI approved aerials have this. Waaaay over the top for Joe public to take in .. better that "the aerial needs to contain a balun which makes it work more efficiently... -- Tony Sayer |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Grimly
Curmudgeon scribeth thus We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember John Rumm saying something like: A bit that was in there - but seemed out of place was on VHF aerials. That is now waiting for some embellishment to turn it into a proper article. (I am not sure how realistic its claims are anyway - never having tried using a TV aerial for radio). Any thoughts?: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=VHF_aerial It's true enough. Yes but although the VHF aerial adds to the cost, like a TV aerial its a very good -investment- (a dirty word in the UK;!), to improve the performance of the equipment connected to it...... -- Tony Sayer |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Confusing newspaper articles and TV news stories on the DTV conversion | [email protected] | High definition TV | 6 | April 17th 08 07:12 PM |
| Couple of interesting news articles | Ben | UK digital tv | 1 | September 30th 05 07:12 PM |
| couple of articles about IPTV | Ben | UK digital tv | 0 | March 9th 05 11:20 PM |
| Are there any good articles on HD --> HD conversion? It sounds easy, but is probably more difficult than PAL --> NTSC | Stephen Neal | High definition TV | 0 | October 30th 04 03:28 PM |
| TiVo related articles | MegaZone | Tivo personal television | 0 | May 26th 04 02:16 AM |